Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Autostart Efficiency Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2017, 04:25 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Oh boy.....
Old 07-06-2017, 04:34 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
mikemtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 689
Received 142 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I have heard that some systems auto start by firing an injector (which one depends on crankshaft position) and carefully timed spark to get the warm engine going again. This would be more fuel efficient and save starters and batteries. I don't know if ford uses this method.
I know that I can tell the difference between it starting when I take my foot off the brake and it starting when the AC comes.
The following users liked this post:
backpackster (07-10-2017)
Old 07-06-2017, 04:38 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 14,966
Received 5,989 Likes on 3,553 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by curlysir
Do you own a truck with this auto stop/start feature? I didn't know they put this feature on a 2013 5.0.
I do not. But I do own a 2010 Fusion Hybrid, which not only turns off at every stop light, but turns off every time I drop below 47 MPH if the batteries can handle the load. I get a great 37MPH in the summer, and low 30s in the winter. Love the technology!
Old 07-06-2017, 04:41 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
mikemtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 689
Received 142 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

I've said this before but I'll say it again. If I'd never known about start/stop and there wasn't the green indicator and the off switch that I would have been curious about I would never have known it is doing it. That being said, if there's an indication that your truck is doing it you need to get it fixed before the warranty expires.
The following users liked this post:
Ricktwuhk (07-06-2017)
Old 07-06-2017, 04:53 PM
  #25  
Texas A&M Aggie
 
tareed94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Pasadena, TX
Posts: 7,515
Received 1,344 Likes on 976 Posts

Default

I messed with it in a company truck, I immediately noticed a difference. The AC doesn't blow as cold when stopped at a red light in South Texas, and is quickly noticeable. If the belt isn't turning, the compressor isn't turning, which isn't allowing your refrigerant to circulate and cool. Therefore, causing the AC system to be less efficient. This is the number one complaint I hear about it, and the only one I have experienced. I tested if I could "beat" the engine to starting, and it was pretty easy to do. This was all on a 2015, so it may have improved (and likely did) by 2017. But these are my real world experiences and I was not impressed.
Old 07-06-2017, 04:55 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
curlysir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 116
Received 23 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BCMIF150
I own a 2017 and find it to be seemless, and don't even notice when it stops or starts any longer.

Were you one of those people who didn't want power steering or brakes either?

Sometimes technology needs to take hold for people to get used to it.
No I am not, why would you assume that? Just because I don't like my vehicle shutting off when I am in stop and go traffic? I embrace technology but not technology that does not enhance my driving experience or makes it potentially unsafe.

Ford could solve this problem for everybody my allowing the owner to shut it off permanently like they do other features.
Old 07-06-2017, 05:05 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

The EPA rules are written such that if you could turn it of permanently, then it would have to be off for the fuel economy testing. If it's off then, there's no point in developing it at all.
The following users liked this post:
Ricktwuhk (07-06-2017)
Old 07-06-2017, 05:07 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
mikemtn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 689
Received 142 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tareed94
I messed with it in a company truck, I immediately noticed a difference. The AC doesn't blow as cold when stopped at a red light in South Texas, and is quickly noticeable. If the belt isn't turning, the compressor isn't turning, which isn't allowing your refrigerant to circulate and cool. Therefore, causing the AC system to be less efficient. This is the number one complaint I hear about it, and the only one I have experienced. I tested if I could "beat" the engine to starting, and it was pretty easy to do. This was all on a 2015, so it may have improved (and likely did) by 2017. But these are my real world experiences and I was not impressed.
On my truck when the AC is needed the compressor starts the truck and I have AC. When the compressor stops start/stop kicks in again. This happens for one cycle and start/stop is disabled untill my next stop. Anybody's truck that doesn't do this needs to get it fixed.
Old 07-06-2017, 05:28 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Napalm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,335
Received 430 Likes on 329 Posts

Default

Couple of myths to clear first.

the whole more effecient to keep running vs the gas to start the engine thing might have been true in the days of carburation but not so much to day and even less so in the world of Direct Injection.

Therefore start stop does save a good bit of fuel in the stop and go life of city drivings. Start stop gives you much of the MPG benefit of hybrids without the cost of the bigger batteries and the electric traction motor.

The additional wear and tear on the engine isn not really true either. Notice start stop doesn't enable until the engine has warmed to a certain point - it waits for the water temp to hit a target, oil temp and the Catalytic converters to reach temp - then it will activate. Thus when it does activate it's starting an engine that has oil everywhere and even some residual oil pressure even at the cam - the engine is shutoff at a particular point in cycle to take the least effort (IE it waits for an optimum shutdown point) and being direct injection it can pulse discrete fuel to the cylinder first getting fired on start up - giving it a little extra to speed up the process. The starter on the stop start models is stronger than necessary and built with bigger bearings

On the annoying parts I will say here in the south and in summer I find it doesn't stay off long because of the aircon - I sort of wish they had put the battery capacity in to run an electric air conditioning compressor like a full hybrid would have. I expect in fall and winter it will shut off quite a while at stop lights.

Side question - I've never sat behind mine but does it happen to keep the brake lights on until you step on the gas pedal when autostart is activated? I could see that being a safety thing - sort of like how hybrids turn on the brake lights when you take your foot off the gas because of regenerative braking.


Originally Posted by etekberg
Just dreaming here:

Wouldn't it be interesting as an experiment to remove all Government regulations, wait for a design cycle or two, and see what features and price points vehicles wind up at?

I wonder how many of these features would be driven by a truly free market?
Originally Posted by engineermike
I've pondered this myself. I think vehicles would be roughly half price.
We have this argument at work often. I would love to see marketed to city folk a car that is only meant to go 50, not certified for interstate travel, light weight - more efficient - feature minimal.

My issue is that while we'd like to see a lot of governmental impact go away - you're not willing to pay for much of it and your insurance company doesn't want you driving without it. Take airbags - made standard by government regulation but pressed into effect by the insurance lobby. Why - reduce cost of casualty rates and reduce cost of injury settlements.

Event recorders - part of every airbag system in a car since 2004 and was part of the move to CAN Buss by many makers. Brought on by EU mandates - accepted by many. If the event of an accident your car can and will tattle on you recording the speed, steering angle, brake force (how hard were you on the brakes), existing fault conditions, and some other things. If you are in an accident and you want to say it was the fault of the car - the event recorder will be used in the lawsuit.

Would you like to opt out of either of those - sure you would. Are you willing to pay for it - I highly doubt it because both will cost you more money upon the purchase of the car.

I'd love to get a car without any sort of infotainment setup and just an empty hole in the dash - so I can put in whatever aftermarket stereo I like. Would love that - but give me universal CAN Buss pass though of those nifty steering wheel controls - because I love that too

HUD - I think all cars should have head up display - but make it an option I'd buy it.

even better standalone options - Now I don't want the whole tech package I just want remote start. (yes often you can add it later)
The following users liked this post:
mikemtn (07-06-2017)
Old 07-06-2017, 05:53 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
aspade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 303
Received 167 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

"Therefore start stop does save a good bit of fuel in the stop and go life of city drivings. Start stop gives you much of the MPG benefit of hybrids without the cost of the bigger batteries and the electric traction motor."

One gallon of gas will idle a little V6 like these for three to four hours. Even in city stop and creep, how long are you really stopped? That isn't a rhetorical question. Between the engine hour meter and the clock in the trip meters you can figure out exactly how much stop start is saving you.

I did figure out, and for me it's 10 hours a year. That's six bucks. A 30 second red light saves you literally half a cent. Some people may sit in traffic twice as much as I do. Some people may be able to take the no-AC sweat in the eyeballs and run it in the summer too. Pretend you do both of these things, which is by now describing a really pretty awful commute, and you're up to 20 bucks a year.

Now factor in that Ford spent, which is to say you and I paid, in the order of 200 bucks per vehicle to add this feature.

It's a kick in the ***** from the EPA and that's all there is to it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM.