5.0 V8 engine verses the 3.5 eco boost? - Page 6 - Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans

Topic Sponsor
2015 - Present Ford F150 General discussion on the latest generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

5.0 V8 engine verses the 3.5 eco boost?

Reply

 
 
 
Old 01-05-2016, 06:11 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Braham, MN
Posts: 277
Thanked 115 Times in 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coobie View Post
I have owned ford trucks for 35 plus years and it seems to me the 5.0 engine is tried and true.
Just wanted to point out that the 5.0L is a brand-new engine for 2010, it has less time on the market than the EB.
TomB985 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 06:37 PM
  #52  
Member
Thread Starter
 
coobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GearheadGeek View Post
An important question that it seems no one has raised during the whole "my engine is better" competition is where do you live and where do you drive? On flat land near sea level the only appreciable difference will be that you'll need more RPM from the Coyote to make similar power. If you live and/or tow at higher elevations, the Ecoboost will outperform the 5.0.
Pretty much a flat lander(southern Michigan) I head north on occasion with mini foot hills.
coobie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 06:44 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 229
Thanked 34 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tooloud10 View Post
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I honestly don't notice any turbo lag on my 3.5EB, probably due to it making peak torque at 2500RPMs versus the 5.0's peak torque not arriving until 3850RPMs.

I went to the dealer with the intention of buying a 5.0, but the 'lag' is exactly what put me in a 3.5EB. They're both good engines but the Ecoboost motors feel like a dog trying to get off its chain, and the 5.0 felt like an older dog that could perform if it had to, but you really had to put your boot in his *** first.
The turbos on the ecoboost are so small I never even noticed any turbo lag.

My other car is an 2.0l with a 64mm turbo that has some pretty good lag!
4B11TX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 06:56 PM
  #54  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 25
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

5.0 all the way!!
F150-Tony is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 07:37 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Hadtogetit2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 365
Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts
Default

5.0 with supercharger or 3.5 ecoboost.....note the 2.7 Eco is powerful just not to sure on long term reliability.....note you don't see any other motor in the LIMITED other than the engineering marvel the ecoboost
Hadtogetit2015 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 07:43 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 642
Thanked 59 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Too bad the only power blower options for the 5.0 are $7k or better. $3500 kit and there would be one on mine.
shore is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 08:01 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: South Texas
Posts: 319
Thanked 81 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hadtogetit2015 View Post
5.0 with supercharger or 3.5 ecoboost.....note the 2.7 Eco is powerful just not to sure on long term reliability.....note you don't see any other motor in the LIMITED other than the engineering marvel the ecoboost
3.5 Ecoboost is a Duratech with 2 turbos.
Gene Hunt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 08:23 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
<-KJP->'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 892
Thanked 138 Times in 100 Posts
Default

Coobie you need to take them all for a spin. Try all the engines.
<-KJP-> is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 08:27 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
Hadtogetit2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 365
Thanked 54 Times in 32 Posts
Default

5.0  V8 engine verses the 3.5 eco boost?-image-3567849011.jpg
Hadtogetit2015 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2016, 08:43 PM
  #60  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

2016 5L with 3.73 is what I ended up with (38 gal tank).

When comparing the 2015 5.0L vs the 2016 5.0L I felt the shifting was considerably smoother with the 2016. However I do not recall what the gearing was on the 2015. I did drive the 2015 3.5L and preferred what I purchased.

I do agree with many that all 3 options are good. I just preferred all 8 cylinders. With over 2k miles now in the first week, I'm happy with my choice in motor and gearing. The drive from Oregon to Arizona was great with no shifting issues. It was great making it from Portland to Sacramento on a single tank.
Elirider is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.0 V8 engine verses the 3.5 eco boost?


Contact Us Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: