Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.5EB w/35s MPG SUCKS!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2017, 04:11 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
aliass24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 790
Received 133 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

In order to get 3.73's with the 3.5 you have to get the HD payload package.
Old 01-20-2017, 05:13 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Great white's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,127
Received 209 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

You're getting "whammied" from a couple different angles here:

Increase rolling resistance
Heavier tires
Increased wind resistance (drag) from both lifting the truck (underbody is the worst part of a vehicle for drag) and showing more tire to frontal area.
Bigger tires (and probably higher offset rims) are defeating Ford's sneaky little "wind curtain" in the wheel wells
Gearing
Probably have more foot in it everywhere, even if you don't realize it.

It all conspires to give you the 4-odd mpg drop.

About the only ones you can do anything about is gearing and your foot, unless you want to alter the vehicle from its current state.
Old 01-20-2017, 07:17 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

Yes your drop in mpg is normal. I hope your need for extra ground clearance off road out weighs the inefficiency.
Old 01-20-2017, 08:02 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Something you hear over and over on this forum is how you don't need to regear with the ecoboost - because torks

Completely false.

Gearing has NOTHING to do with engine output. Two simple points to prove that out.

1) gear calculators don't use engine output as part of their equation

2) Trophy trucks run over 800hp/700tq and they use the same gearing strategy as us mortals.

Baseline for 35" tires with our 6spd transmission is 4.10:1 - regardless of which engine you have.

Baseline for 37" tires with our 6spd transmission is 4.56:1 - regardless of which engine you have.

Having the appropriate gear will net better mpgs than running oversize tires on too tall of a gear.

Will you get Factory mpg, of course not. Does it make up the cost in a reasonable timespan - irrelevant.

It's about mechanical advantage and reducing premature wear. Do a lot of guys run oversize tires on ridiculously under-geared setups, yep.

As with anything there is the right way to do things and then there is the way everyone else does it. Changing gears isn't cheap but the performance gain far outweighs the cost.
The following 3 users liked this post by WarSurfer:
buzzin 1/2 dozen (01-20-2017), ns_redneck (01-20-2017), wxsquid (01-21-2017)
Old 01-20-2017, 08:25 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
aliass24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 790
Received 133 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

What kind of gearing do you think you need with 35's and the new 10 speed?
Old 01-20-2017, 08:25 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
alping45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cuba, NY
Posts: 472
Received 58 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

My '15 XLT s-crew 3.5 EB w the 3.55 gears was getting 18-19mpg stock. After 2.5 level, +1" spacer in the rear, and 35" STT Pro's, I now average 15 if I'm lucky. And that is running the 5* 91 performance tune with ethanol free 91 octane. With 10% 91 I'm more like 14mpg. Right on par or even a tad better then my similarly configured '13 5.0, but way way more power. I'm perfectly satisfied.

Also the biggest factor I've noticed on mpgs is speed. I run about 30 miles of highway everyday at 75mph, and that is what is suckling down the gas. It's in boost the whole time. If I take a different route on back roads doing 55mph, I can easily gain a couple mpgs back.

Last edited by alping45; 01-20-2017 at 08:28 AM.
Old 01-20-2017, 08:37 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aliass24
What kind of gearing do you think you need with 35's and the new 10 speed?
I don't know the gearing in the 10spd but the new Raptor has a 10spd and still comes with 34.5" tires and 4.10:1 gears. That leads me to believe the same rules still apply.
Old 01-20-2017, 09:01 AM
  #28  
Member
 
kimber76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have a 2015 with a 3.5 ecoboost with a 6 inch lift and 35s, I get around 15 mpg which I'm more than happy with. I still makes me scratch my head every time someone posts on here that the mpg sucks. I didn't buy my truck for mpg and I didn't lift it for better mpg. These are trucks they are heavy they are not going to get great mpg. And just for comparison if you Think 14 mpg or what ever sucks with 35s I recently had a loaner from ford while mine was in the shop. They gave me a 2016 f150 with the 2.7 I put 300 or so miles on this while I had it and the best I could get out of it was 14.5. The 2.7 did not impress me at all, For more than just the lack of mpg. Sure it wasn't broke in yet but none the less I will be keeping my 3.5 ecoboost.
Old 01-20-2017, 09:38 AM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
ride_002000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Could try a tuner, should gain ~1 mpg or more depending.
Old 01-20-2017, 09:42 AM
  #30  
Member
 
D0T-C0M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 91
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris70
He quoted mixed driving was in that 14.1-14.7 range not highway at 65-70mph
65-70mph isn't really highway. The speed at which they quote highway speeds is 77km/hr (50mph). I can get about 15-16 mpg with mixed driving too but I'm really babying it. If I rode with a heavier foot 14mpg is pretty normal but I would expect the 3.5L to be slightly better than the 5.0L. BTW, If I drive 45-50mph I get 18.5mpg on the highway.

All values above using the US gal(3.8L/gallon)
The following users liked this post:
GrasslandHVAC (01-21-2017)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 PM.