Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.5 Eco to 2.7 Eco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2018, 11:34 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

with the 3.5 and 2.7 don't worry about what the rear ratio is unless you're towing heavier than 5000 lbs or you're putting bigger tires on it. If you're doing neither literally whatever ratio the truck you're looking at and like has is fine. They make enough power and torque you won't even be able to notice.

My 3.5 super crew with 3.15's felt better than a 5.0 with 3.55's driving around like normal.
Old 11-19-2018, 11:36 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
riptide88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,771
Received 555 Likes on 380 Posts
Default

Have you driven it? Asking members will help a bit but only you will be able to say for sure whether you like it or not.
Old 11-19-2018, 01:08 PM
  #13  
Member
 
Red17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 46
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

'17 2.7 Scab, 6 speed auto, 3.55s. 18.7 overall mpg, high 22.3, low 14.somthing. Speedy, unfazed by hills or high altitude. (Runs the same at 8000 feet) On road trips I spend most of the time between 1500-2000 rpm. Mileage drops as speed goes up, nothing unique to the 2.7 on that.

If you are not towing you will be very happy with the 2.7.
Old 11-19-2018, 03:20 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
caperJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Winter Wonderland Alberta
Posts: 4,532
Received 705 Likes on 547 Posts

Default

I intend on test driving it for a few days as my dealer will allow this, just want the knowledge from this forum.
Old 11-19-2018, 04:15 PM
  #15  
Member
 
011screwball's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 76
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I was hesitant to get the 2.7 instead of the 3.5 but I am glad that I did. The gas mileage is amazing-19.6 MPG since i got it 6,000 miles ago (According to the dash) and i really haven't been trying to achieve good mileage. My 2011 5.0 averaged 15 when i tried to get good mileage and usually 14 or less when I just drove regular. Overall it is as fast as and as powerful as the 5.0. Unless you intend on towing regularly, you will be just fine with the 2.7.
Old 11-19-2018, 04:16 PM
  #16  
Super Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
djfllmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 21,309
Received 4,137 Likes on 2,837 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 011screwball
I was hesitant to get the 2.7 instead of the 3.5 but I am glad that I did. The gas mileage is amazing-19.6 MPG since i got it 6,000 miles ago (According to the dash) and i really haven't been trying to achieve good mileage. My 2011 5.0 averaged 15 when i tried to get good mileage and usually 14 or less when I just drove regular. Overall it is as fast as and as powerful as the 5.0. Unless you intend on towing regularly, you will be just fine with the 2.7.
agreed, i had 2 5.0 trucks and got the 2.7 in my 2018. holy crap does this truck have a lot more low end grunt over the 5.0
Old 11-19-2018, 04:20 PM
  #17  
F150 XLT
 
GTA150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 450
Received 178 Likes on 114 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by w00t692
with the 3.5 and 2.7 don't worry about what the rear ratio is unless you're towing heavier than 5000 lbs or you're putting bigger tires on it. If you're doing neither literally whatever ratio the truck you're looking at and like has is fine. They make enough power and torque you won't even be able to notice.

My 3.5 super crew with 3.15's felt better than a 5.0 with 3.55's driving around like normal.
Originally Posted by Red17
'17 2.7 Scab, 6 speed auto, 3.55s. 18.7 overall mpg, high 22.3, low 14.somthing. Speedy, unfazed by hills or high altitude. (Runs the same at 8000 feet) On road trips I spend most of the time between 1500-2000 rpm. Mileage drops as speed goes up, nothing unique to the 2.7 on that.

If you are not towing you will be very happy with the 2.7.
I have a 2017 2.7 with 3.15s and I tow a 7500 TT just fine (6800 empty, 7449 fully loaded). Both on long hauls and steep grades it has plenty of power for towing and still gets great mileage. Going from 500 elevation, up to 6500 and settling in 5000 high desert, I average 11-12MPG pulling my family and TT. In town I average 22MPG with about 65% city driving and 35% highway. I absolutely love my 2.7 as it does everything I need it to do, has plenty of instant power and is extremely smooth on the road.

26' TT

Last edited by GTA150; 11-19-2018 at 04:40 PM.
The following users liked this post:
5star (11-19-2018)
Old 11-19-2018, 04:41 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
w00t692's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,229
Received 612 Likes on 439 Posts
Default

I ain't saying you'll have a problem. Just saying it might feel better towing heavier stuff with a shorter ratio.
Old 11-19-2018, 07:42 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
dalola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,277
Received 1,585 Likes on 950 Posts
Default

I'm on my second 2.7 F150. Loved the first one so much, it was my choice engine for truck #2 as well. For me, it's the perfect blend of power, refinement, and efficiency, for a half ton P/U. I also pull a 5K# tandem flatbed trailer, and the 2.7/10AT is a towing beast. I can regularly get 16-18 mpg's while towing, with power to spare. Averaging 22-24 in normal unloaded driving. Yes, I've driven the 3.5 & 5.0, but always come back to the 2.7. Just a fantastic all-around engine, that responds so well to whatever you're doing.
Old 11-20-2018, 02:00 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Mark Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,237
Received 754 Likes on 515 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by caperj
No towing for either, I don't understand the (from a Super Crew 3.5 to a 2.7 Super Cab)? Should be very little difference because the box is shorter but bed is longer and with aluminum the weight difference should be close.
Longer bed on Super Cab yes but nothing in it, but more glass and more Aluminum and I bet the seats are also heavier in the Crew Cab!!I bet the Super Cab with 6 1/2' bed would have to be lighter than a Crew Cab 5 1/2 Foot bed!!


Quick Reply: 3.5 Eco to 2.7 Eco



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.