Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2017 F150 10 speed problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2017, 08:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Cwprotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 558
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deapee
Don't have a 17 myself, but my 16 feels a bit thunky and jerky compared to how I remember my 07 being. I'm not worried about it, but there is something there that jerks in these trucks (both when coming to a stop and then initially starting) and it's probably normal. - That is not toward the OP, but to maybe help ease the minds of the couple of posters above me.

I had an 07. Those trucks were meant to shift so smooth you couldn't feel it. I bought a programmer to firm them up and make them faster so I wouldn't burn up clutches.
Old 03-01-2017, 08:21 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
jtnuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 863
Received 100 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Some of the new 10 speeds will have issues period. Just like any vehicle will. There are some raptor owners that have a issue yes, but there are way more that do not. When for did all the media reviews and drives these trucks worked great. Not every truck and component can be built perfect. I do hope that ford takes care of the issues really quick for everyone. Mines coming next month, im keeping my fingers crossed.
Old 03-01-2017, 08:31 PM
  #13  
Member
 
shelteredraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Long Island
Posts: 55
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I'm really liking my 10 speed. I live in sport mode and play around with the paddles alot. So far, so good. Oh, I have a whopping 300 miles...
Old 03-01-2017, 08:31 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
RL1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,249
Received 1,139 Likes on 713 Posts
Default

Not downing Ford but an all new engine paired with an all new transmission is a recipe for disaster. I would say the same thing if it was a Tundra. The six speed works really well and doesn't seem to be in need of additional ratios. A ZF engineer was quoted saying that all of their research indicates that 8 speeds is the most ratios you can use without excessive gear hunting. They built the 9 speed transmission out of customers wanting better fuel economy.

The 10 speed is a joint venture with GM but GM only uses it in the Camaro SS as far as I know. They are phasing their RWD 8 speed transmission into their trucks.
The following users liked this post:
kendive (03-06-2017)
Old 03-01-2017, 08:32 PM
  #15  
Member
 
shelteredraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Long Island
Posts: 55
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

ZR1
Old 03-01-2017, 09:17 PM
  #16  
Airstreamer
 
GearheadGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 468
Received 84 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RL1990
Not downing Ford but an all new engine paired with an all new transmission is a recipe for disaster. I would say the same thing if it was a Tundra. The six speed works really well and doesn't seem to be in need of additional ratios. A ZF engineer was quoted saying that all of their research indicates that 8 speeds is the most ratios you can use without excessive gear hunting. They built the 9 speed transmission out of customers wanting better fuel economy.

The 10 speed is a joint venture with GM but GM only uses it in the Camaro SS as far as I know. They are phasing their RWD 8 speed transmission into their trucks.
I haven't towed with my truck yet, so I don't know what it'll do when it actually has to work a bit harder, but so far at highway speeds in the hill country and in traffic, it doesn't have a hunting problem. It's a 3.55 diff and it pretty happy to pull long I-10 hills at 75 in 10th or 9th and isn't shifting back and forth, for example. I haven't run it on cruise yet (I'm still at 525 miles) but it doesn't seem to have a problem with hunting.

It does have the occasional lumpy-feeling shift at suburban speeds, tooling along at 30-50 with changes from part-throttle acceleration to coasting, etc. Nothing that's bothersome so far, just things I notice because I'm paying closer attention while I learn its behavior.
Old 03-01-2017, 09:18 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
BShadows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 932
Received 189 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RL1990
Not downing Ford but an all new engine paired with an all new transmission is a recipe for disaster. I would say the same thing if it was a Tundra. The six speed works really well and doesn't seem to be in need of additional ratios. A ZF engineer was quoted saying that all of their research indicates that 8 speeds is the most ratios you can use without excessive gear hunting. They built the 9 speed transmission out of customers wanting better fuel economy.


The 10 speed is a joint venture with GM but GM only uses it in the Camaro SS as far as I know. They are phasing their RWD 8 speed transmission into their trucks.
The 10 feels smooth. I'm not noticing any hunting at all. Whatever Ford and GM did, they made a pretty damn fine transmission considering there are 10 speeds. The engine isn't all new, it's a revision of the proven 3.5Ecoboost .
Old 03-01-2017, 10:43 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Tim15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: La Porte, IN
Posts: 61
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I took delivery of my '17 Limited also from the MI plant and received it on Dec 31st. I have had zero issues with the trans or engine. Love this truck!!
Old 03-01-2017, 10:52 PM
  #19  
Airstreamer
 
GearheadGeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 468
Received 84 Likes on 62 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BShadows
The 10 feels smooth. I'm not noticing any hunting at all. Whatever Ford and GM did, they made a pretty damn fine transmission considering there are 10 speeds. The engine isn't all new, it's a revision of the proven 3.5Ecoboost .
While I'm not afraid of it (I bought one, after all!) Gen2 has a lot of changes from the Gen1 3.5EB. Port+direct injection (and all the software differences that combo must require), different turbos, electrically-actuated wastegates, auto-stop-start, different pistons, higher base compression, etc.

So far I've nothing to complain about... hand-calculated 18 mpg on my first tank in mixed driving (my '07 only got 18 a couple of times on the highway!) and DAMN it's a nice truck.

As I mentioned, it has had a few less-refined shifts in challenging conditions, low-speed suburban traffic with stop lights, etc. That's the only questionable trait I've seen in the 10-spd but I don't have many miles yet.
Old 03-01-2017, 11:55 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
sailorjerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 276
Received 53 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pavman
The truck is a special order Limited, I believe from the Dearborne plant. I received it around Jan 5th. The current mileage is 1,260 so this problem started around the 1,000 mile mark. To clarify, it is not slow to engage, it flat out won't engage. before i took it in for service I almost called a tow truck, but after the 50th start it worked... i would say it sounds like a programming issue, but the noise from the transmission is concerning... I hope this is a one off issue...
More than likely you have a stuck solenoid or one that is not getting the proper voltage. These transmissions can also be very sensitive to fluid level and contamination to the point the 6R80 doesn't even have a dipstick because ford doesn't want people messing with them. Are you able to check the fluid level easily on the 10R80?

My brother recently purchased a new honda CRV and they had a run of transmissions that they forgot to fill with fluid.

Anyway the 6R80 is quite a complex valve body and honestly the 10R80 scares me quite a bit. I worked for a company building a prototype transmission for the JLTV that replaced the Humvee and I must say the 10R80 is going to be a guinea pig for quite a while, its just the way it is.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 PM.