Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7l Real World MPG Post

Old 08-27-2015, 12:22 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
2.7Ecoboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 527
Received 75 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CreepinDeth
Fuelly.com is where users post up real world mpg results for all vehicles and combos.
Right now theres 35 2.7l Ecoboost owners with an average of 18.1mpg between them all

http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/f-150...=&submodel_id=
I'm familier-

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
People also post real world MPG here, so disregard the unflattering comments from people who don't even drive the truck. fuelly.com is great for tracking, but posting your numbers here and reviewing this thread will give you a chance to see what forum members are getting and will also give you the opportunity to compare against 4x4, RWD, 3.31/3.55/3.73

Here is the original thread: https://www.f150forum.com/f118/2-7-m...rmance-284018/

By the way, I'm getting 20.8 lifetime so far after 2600 miles. It's lifted with 34" tires. I was getting 19 pretty consistently in the 08' Tacoma I traded in.
Agreed
Old 08-27-2015, 02:51 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
ZombieFiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Van Alstyne TX
Posts: 102
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

my 15 2.7 EB XLT SCrew 3.31 has been getting about 18-19 in city and have topped out at 24 on a road trip. My truck has 1300 on it. The truck is stock. Most of my driving has been in city and it is around 18.5 to 19.8 per the MPG calculator on the cluster.
Old 08-27-2015, 04:33 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
katoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 655
Received 55 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Got about 3700 miles on mine to date, 3.55 ratio and lifetime according to computer is 19mpg. What I'm seeing on my daily commute screen which I reset at each fill up is also right around 19 but some days closer to 18.5, just depends on my driving each day.
I've done a couple trips down the hwy for a couple hundred miles and on those trips I'm around 22 but I've also gone through canyons on those trips.
Old 08-27-2015, 04:45 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
2.7Ecoboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 527
Received 75 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Yes it seems like 22 is about what people are getting on the highway. I drive on the tollway by my house a lot and the speed limit is 80. Driving at 80 kills my mileage. I've noticed an improvement if I can keep it at 75 or lower and the 22mpg is at about 65ish. The city driving is where I would like to see an improvement.

I have also noticed the the computer on the truck is overly optimistic. So you need to hand calculate if you want an exact mpg reading.
Old 08-27-2015, 07:05 PM
  #15  
F250>F150


iTrader: (2)
 
BoozeDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 2,232
Received 917 Likes on 483 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2.7Ecoboost
Yes it seems like 22 is about what people are getting on the highway. I drive on the tollway by my house a lot and the speed limit is 80. Driving at 80 kills my mileage. I've noticed an improvement if I can keep it at 75 or lower and the 22mpg is at about 65ish. The city driving is where I would like to see an improvement.

I have also noticed the the computer on the truck is overly optimistic. So you need to hand calculate if you want an exact mpg reading.
I thought every road in Austin was a tollway

I just filled up the other day and the truck was telling me 20.8. Hand calculated to 20.4. I pump fuel until it stops then tick to the next even dollar amount. I stopped filling it full-full. It seems the computer is more accurate if I stop when it shuts off.
Old 08-27-2015, 07:32 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
2.7Ecoboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 527
Received 75 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
I thought every road in Austin was a tollway

I just filled up the other day and the truck was telling me 20.8. Hand calculated to 20.4. I pump fuel until it stops then tick to the next even dollar amount. I stopped filling it full-full. It seems the computer is more accurate if I stop when it shuts off.
You know you might be on to something. Also I now have 1800 miles and it does seem more accurate maybe it needed to calibrate. Do you let your tuck idle much? I was letting it idle in the morning before work maybe 5-10 minutes and at lunch if I went to get something to eat I have wondered how much of a negative impact that was causing. I have since tried to limit the idle times.
Old 08-27-2015, 07:42 PM
  #17  
F250>F150


iTrader: (2)
 
BoozeDaily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 2,232
Received 917 Likes on 483 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2.7Ecoboost
You know you might be on to something. Also I now have 1800 miles and it does seem more accurate maybe it needed to calibrate. Do you let your tuck idle much? I was letting it idle in the morning before work maybe 5-10 minutes and at lunch if I went to get something to eat I have wondered how much of a negative impact that was causing. I have since tried to limit the idle times.
I haven't done any idling since it was icy up here but when I did I found that if I remote started, the MPGs weren't affected on the computer display. If I idled on a regular start I could see the MPGs dropping with time. I could be wrong on this, but it seemed that when I would get to work it would say like 19.3 on the readout and then in the morning when I left after idling for about 10 minutes on remote start it still said 19.3 when I started. Well, obviously I burned fuel so that would affect a hand calc.

Whether that's the case for all or a fluke with me, I'm not sure. Maybe I'll check it out next time before I leave work I'll remote start for 10 minutes or so and see if it affects the last readout I had.
Old 08-27-2015, 08:39 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
AbitaPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,193
Received 241 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BoozeDaily
I haven't done any idling since it was icy up here but when I did I found that if I remote started, the MPGs weren't affected on the computer display. If I idled on a regular start I could see the MPGs dropping with time. I could be wrong on this, but it seemed that when I would get to work it would say like 19.3 on the readout and then in the morning when I left after idling for about 10 minutes on remote start it still said 19.3 when I started. Well, obviously I burned fuel so that would affect a hand calc.

Whether that's the case for all or a fluke with me, I'm not sure. Maybe I'll check it out next time before I leave work I'll remote start for 10 minutes or so and see if it affects the last readout I had.
Yes, idling does affect the MPG readout on the display for average MPG. You may not see it for a few minutes, but the longer it sits in idle, the more change you will see.
Old 08-29-2015, 12:17 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
thekevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 509
Received 42 Likes on 39 Posts

Default 2.7l Real World MPG Post

I drove from Branson Missouri to Kansas City last night and this is what my truck was showing. I found that 72mph is the sweet spot.

Name:  20150828_170439_zpsw41v9t6s.jpg
Views: 13119
Size:  293.6 KB
Old 08-30-2015, 07:52 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Fend2ride2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 62
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Ok so I've only driven my truck for 1200 miles so far.. but I've seen some incredible mpgs... like 26-27.. I drove 60 miles today.. average was at 29mpg when I got home... no lie... I think when it's 70-75 degrees outside I when I see the biggest numbers.. today was obviously one of those days..

2.7l scab xl sport 3.55

Last edited by Fend2ride2; 08-30-2015 at 07:54 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2.7l Real World MPG Post



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.