2.7L EcoBoost Payload Package: Let's see your payload door stickers
#1
Member
Thread Starter
2.7L EcoBoost Payload Package: Let's see your payload door stickers
I am just curious what payload numbers people are seeing in these 2.7L EcoBoost Payload packages. Please post you door payload stickers and general options list.
I would like to tow a 7300 lb trailer (w/ appropriate WD hitch of course) and still have some payload left over to throw some heavy things in the bed, but looking at some of the payload numbers on some of the more heavily optioned and upscale trimlines has me worried. May have to opt for a 3.5L EcoBoost with HD paylaod package, if they ever become available.
I would like to tow a 7300 lb trailer (w/ appropriate WD hitch of course) and still have some payload left over to throw some heavy things in the bed, but looking at some of the payload numbers on some of the more heavily optioned and upscale trimlines has me worried. May have to opt for a 3.5L EcoBoost with HD paylaod package, if they ever become available.
The following users liked this post:
Mach5 (06-26-2015)
#4
Senior Member
I am just curious what payload numbers people are seeing in these 2.7L EcoBoost Payload packages. Please post you door payload stickers and general options list.
I would like to tow a 7300 lb trailer (w/ appropriate WD hitch of course) and still have some payload left over to throw some heavy things in the bed, but looking at some of the payload numbers on some of the more heavily optioned and upscale trimlines has me worried. May have to opt for a 3.5L EcoBoost with HD paylaod package, if they ever become available.
I would like to tow a 7300 lb trailer (w/ appropriate WD hitch of course) and still have some payload left over to throw some heavy things in the bed, but looking at some of the payload numbers on some of the more heavily optioned and upscale trimlines has me worried. May have to opt for a 3.5L EcoBoost with HD paylaod package, if they ever become available.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Danager, while I would like the torque and availability of upper level models and option packages that come with the 3.5L EcoBoost, I would really like the fuel savings of the 2.7L for the majority of the time that I am commuting and not towing a trailer.
I also notice that the payload numbers are not much higher on the Non-HDP 3.5L than the 2.7L with it's payload package, which was my original concern.
PS: Can't seem to locate your signature, where does one look for it?
I also notice that the payload numbers are not much higher on the Non-HDP 3.5L than the 2.7L with it's payload package, which was my original concern.
PS: Can't seem to locate your signature, where does one look for it?
Last edited by Mach5; 06-26-2015 at 03:29 PM. Reason: added PS
The following users liked this post:
KTM753 (05-04-2022)
#6
I have the truck listed in my signature. My door sticker is 1,650 pounds (500 pounds more than my 11). I tow a 7,500lb loaded toy hauler. I haven't pulled with the new truck yet but I had a 2011 same truck with 3.5 Ecoboost. It pulled so well I didn't even consider the 2.7, but I go out west every summer and need the power for the mountains.
For the mpg difference I would rather have the reserve power for when needed. I compare the 3.5 more to the overall savings of buying a diesel.
For the mpg difference I would rather have the reserve power for when needed. I compare the 3.5 more to the overall savings of buying a diesel.
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Yah, if I were towing over 7000 lbs on a daily basis I would seriously consider the F250 Powerstroke, regardless of the price of diesel. As it is, I don't want an F250 for a daily commuter.
I guess I am looking for reassurance that if I decide on the 2.7L, load it up to within 99.9% of the GVWR and GCWR limits with trailer, canoe, and camping gear, that it will have enough reserve performance to pull up the Rockies and Sierras and enough brakes on the way down the other side. The 3.5L Eco HD payload package is looking like the smarter option for what I have in mind. Unfortunately selecting the HD payload package leaves you with few options and model lines to select from.
I know, I know... first world problems! Stop your whining, buy the truck, and git 'er done!
I guess I am looking for reassurance that if I decide on the 2.7L, load it up to within 99.9% of the GVWR and GCWR limits with trailer, canoe, and camping gear, that it will have enough reserve performance to pull up the Rockies and Sierras and enough brakes on the way down the other side. The 3.5L Eco HD payload package is looking like the smarter option for what I have in mind. Unfortunately selecting the HD payload package leaves you with few options and model lines to select from.
I know, I know... first world problems! Stop your whining, buy the truck, and git 'er done!
Trending Topics
#8
Yah, if I were towing over 7000 lbs on a daily basis I would seriously consider the F250 Powerstroke, regardless of the price of diesel. As it is, I don't want an F250 for a daily commuter.
I guess I am looking for reassurance that if I decide on the 2.7L, load it up to within 99.9% of the GVWR and GCWR limits with trailer, canoe, and camping gear, that it will have enough reserve performance to pull up the Rockies and Sierras and enough brakes on the way down the other side. The 3.5L Eco HD payload package is looking like the smarter option for what I have in mind. Unfortunately selecting the HD payload package leaves you with few options and model lines to select from.
I know, I know... first world problems! Stop your whining, buy the truck, and git 'er done!
I guess I am looking for reassurance that if I decide on the 2.7L, load it up to within 99.9% of the GVWR and GCWR limits with trailer, canoe, and camping gear, that it will have enough reserve performance to pull up the Rockies and Sierras and enough brakes on the way down the other side. The 3.5L Eco HD payload package is looking like the smarter option for what I have in mind. Unfortunately selecting the HD payload package leaves you with few options and model lines to select from.
I know, I know... first world problems! Stop your whining, buy the truck, and git 'er done!
Now back to your post...the 2.7 WITH the Payload Package is a very interesting choice. Gives you about the payload of the standard F150. (Why didn't Ford just give it the same 7000 GVWR Package?) For a 7000 GVWR trailer you will be just fine for your towing and get great mileage.
I love my 3.5 but I'm not seeing the benefit. I will never tow 10k with a half ton on a regular basis.
Plus with travel trailers, good luck not exceeding the hitch rating when you add a weight distribution hitch and 12-13% tongue weight of a 8000 lb GVWR trailer (tow rating of 2.7 SuperCrew 4x4 5.5ft bed F150). Just because it says the 3.5 can tow 10700 lbs (my 3.5 tow rating) doesn't mean you can.
Get the 2.7 with Payload Package or the 3.5 with HDPP if you haul a lot and tow.
BTW, love my 3.5 Lariat 502A. Just giving an owners opinion.
Last edited by jcb206; 06-27-2015 at 12:43 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Part of my point is, you really should be looking at three trucks.
2.7 with HD package
3.5 with Max Tow
3.5 with HD package
The 3.5 with Max Tow gives you more payload than the 2.7 HD. The 3.5 Max Tow also allows you to add more options than the 3.5 HD.
2.7 with HD package
3.5 with Max Tow
3.5 with HD package
The 3.5 with Max Tow gives you more payload than the 2.7 HD. The 3.5 Max Tow also allows you to add more options than the 3.5 HD.
#10
Senior Member
Just got my Lariat Screw 2wd with 6 1/2' bed, moonroof, leather...