Lou1947

Thinking about getting a new KR or a Tundra 1794, however the Tundra is about ten thousand less than the KR and the trade in value of 2014 KR is about $4000 less than a 1794 both with the same mileage. What is up with the Tundras holding up so much of their value?

Ford Fan#1

milage. Wreckage. Motor. Lots of things personally I would get the real thing. A King Ranch. The 1794 is a ripoff

djfllmn

iTrader: (1)

toyotas hold their value extremely well


you cant go wrong with either truck really

dubsesd

Toyota trucks have always held value well. My 2004 double cab tundra was 6 years old when I sold it. It was priced 10k more than similar Ford and gm trucks and sold in 3 days. Was it a better truck than the last 2 ford trucks I owned? No

screamineagle

I agree, plus, both trucks look very similar now with the redesigned F150.

lariatpsd

KR all day

dubsesd

Anything in that price range without at least hid headlights gets the boot from me. My friend bought a Denali and it has halogen headlights with horrible output. Halogen headlights in a 70k truck....really?

Lou1947

I have a 2010 KR that have owned since I bought it new in 2010. The truck has been reliable but not trouble free. Front wheel bearing, catalytic converter, temperature control on dash, front transfer case and a few other small things such as rusting of paint color rear bumper, back up sensors, and leaking roof stop light. Overall u like the KR ride but hate to buy a truck that cost $61,000.

ducgsxr

This $10K difference. Is that real best deal on both trucks, or just sticker price spread?

ztruk8

what??? only problem my 2010 stx had was the leaky brake light, that's it