Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

'16 lower valance/airdam removal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2016, 03:38 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
ilkhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 278
Received 48 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CJW91
[MG]http://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.f150forum.com-vbulletin/1170x1560/80-before_e02fcfa49608c5ffc3fd292c93312ce9e17c699e.jp g[/IMG]



I think it looks much better removed. Plus it would have been damaged eventually when offroading or in the snow.
Not quite as good looking as a raptor bumper, but still much better than stock.
Old 10-13-2016, 05:00 PM
  #42  
Member
 
lansing0713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Iowa
Posts: 62
Received 46 Likes on 17 Posts

Default



I trimmed mine because I didn't want the tabs or empty holes. I cut it along the contour of the airdam. It was easy to do with a dremel cutting wheel. With the trim job you get the added clearance and it still looks like nothing is missing from the front end. Mileage did not change.
The following 2 users liked this post by lansing0713:
darkrider (01-30-2017), NITRO-FC (11-23-2016)
Old 10-13-2016, 05:45 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Lare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The Southwestern Desert
Posts: 544
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Default No mpg difference?

If the valance/dam really did nothing at all why would Fomoco go through the design expense and cost to build and install them? It's not like it's something that's supposed to improve the overall look. Or is it?
The following users liked this post:
German_truck (10-14-2016)
Old 10-13-2016, 05:57 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
robbieg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,562
Received 877 Likes on 561 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lare
If the valance/dam really did nothing at all why would Fomoco go through the design expense and cost to build and install them? It's not like it's something that's supposed to improve the overall look. Or is it?
They absolutely wouldn't. In a test environment you can bet it makes a difference in NVH or milage or both. The question is does it make a difference in YOUR normal daily driving.
Old 10-13-2016, 06:02 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Lare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The Southwestern Desert
Posts: 544
Received 94 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robbieg
They absolutely wouldn't. In a test environment you can bet it makes a difference in NVH or milage or both. The question is does it make a difference in YOUR normal daily driving.
For now I'm leaving mine on, but since I tend to forget about it, I expect I'll lose it on a spur of the moment off road excursion. It really changes the approach angle.
Old 10-14-2016, 12:39 AM
  #46  
Effin New Guys
 
Ryan...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 498
Received 110 Likes on 84 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lare
If the valance/dam really did nothing at all why would Fomoco go through the design expense and cost to build and install them? It's not like it's something that's supposed to improve the overall look. Or is it?
Originally Posted by robbieg
They absolutely wouldn't. In a test environment you can bet it makes a difference in NVH or milage or both. The question is does it make a difference in YOUR normal daily driving.
^^ Precisely.
I'd imagine in a perfect scenario you may gain .4 MPG, but for those of us that have to deal with traffic, year round weather, etc I challenge anyone to show that they actually lost fuel due to removing the air dam
Old 10-14-2016, 10:07 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Axxion89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 189
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryan...
^^ Precisely.
I'd imagine in a perfect scenario you may gain .4 MPG, but for those of us that have to deal with traffic, year round weather, etc I challenge anyone to show that they actually lost fuel due to removing the air dam
Agree 100%, there probably is an MPG benefit but it would be so minute that it could not be statistically measured outside of a controlled environment (wind tunnel, EPA studies, etc). The only thing I'd be curious about is does it impact wind noise? I heard a few responses on here mention it
Old 10-14-2016, 11:28 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
bigdad84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eagle Butte, South Dakota
Posts: 104
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I removed mine awhile back (no pictures, sorry) and never once noticed any decrease in performance or mph difference. I'm glad I kept it though, because a couple months later I ended up leveling my pickup and putting it back on. With the front end sitting up 2.5" higher it doesn't look as stupid and close to the ground as before.

Last edited by bigdad84; 10-14-2016 at 11:28 AM. Reason: Spelling
Old 10-14-2016, 11:45 AM
  #49  
Turbo --> :-)
 
Turbo_Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Montreal
Posts: 280
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Same here, I removed mine and didn't notice any difference in fuel consumption, or noise or anything else.

For the tabs, they are plastic, so I used a heat gun to soften them, and folded them 90* backward. They can be heated again if I decide to reinstall the valance.

Looks better without the lowrider valance IMO.
Old 10-14-2016, 08:42 PM
  #50  
Member
 
Carbeaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 73
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lansing0713


I trimmed mine because I didn't want the tabs or empty holes. I cut it along the contour of the airdam. It was easy to do with a dremel cutting wheel. With the trim job you get the added clearance and it still looks like nothing is missing from the front end. Mileage did not change.
This. This is what I had in mind for mine. Thanks for the pic. My mind's made up now.
The following users liked this post:
lansing0713 (10-17-2016)


Quick Reply: '16 lower valance/airdam removal?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 PM.