Topic Sponsor
Engine / Drivetrain Talk 6 or 8 Cylinders? Come talk about it.
View Poll Results: Would you buy a F150 with a mid-sized diesel engine?
Hell yeah! Any cost premium would be irrelevant.
48
43.64%
Meh, depending on the price premium.
53
48.18%
Gross, who want's an oil burner.
3
2.73%
Hell no, there's is no point we have the 3.5L turbo.
6
5.45%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Would you buy a diesel F150?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 10:54 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
lddrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by domboost
my dad actually got 22 mpg from where his cruise left in florida to atlanta. Pretty impressive actually.
really?? dmax or PSD?? that is fantastic. the 11+ trucks are getting almost the same mileage as the 01-04 trucks did. Amazing how these guys worked around all the emissions stuff to make them both efficient, and environmentally friendly. The DEF is really not as big a deal as people make it out to be as well
Old 11-16-2011, 11:07 PM
  #52  
Unofficial Glass Guru
 
Commander316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raceland, LA
Posts: 1,664
Received 69 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

i would like to see Ford redesign the Ranger into a 2.0-3.0 Turbo Diesel first, to see if there's a market for a smaller truck...
Old 11-16-2011, 11:29 PM
  #53  
BAMF Club
 
ak_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Palmer, Ak
Posts: 5,153
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lddrew
really?? dmax or PSD?? that is fantastic. the 11+ trucks are getting almost the same mileage as the 01-04 trucks did. Amazing how these guys worked around all the emissions stuff to make them both efficient, and environmentally friendly. The DEF is really not as big a deal as people make it out to be as well
ummm...not really. most get low teens stock. Do a little reading on what people have done to get 20+mpg (hint, DPF delete)
Old 11-17-2011, 08:05 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
lddrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

13-15 city stock
18-22 highway
i'd say that's pretty good. and i've done my reading

http://www.duramaxforum.com/forum/20...l-mileage.html

http://www.duramaxforum.com/forum/20...l-mileage.html

http://www.duramaxforum.com/forum/20...x-mileage.html
Old 11-17-2011, 01:20 PM
  #55  
BAMF Club
 
ak_cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Palmer, Ak
Posts: 5,153
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

^ thats from one motor...look up what cummins and powerstroke are getting
Old 11-17-2011, 06:56 PM
  #56  
zap
Senior Member
 
zap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Raiderland, TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The main issue is not many people have yet driven the new emissions vehicles far enough to actually get the motors broken in yet to get a true mileage count off of them. Most engines don't hit peak efficiency until 2500 hrs. (which is like 104 days of continuous running).
Old 11-17-2011, 07:44 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
lddrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ak_cowboy
^ thats from one motor...look up what cummins and powerstroke are getting
With all due respect I wouldn't be in the market for a new PSD or Cummins, especially not the cummins. the 6.7 PSD would be my second choice. but i'd be in a dmax, and the numbers are impressive at least to me
Old 11-18-2011, 08:40 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maineville Ohio
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lddrew
With all due respect I wouldn't be in the market for a new PSD or Cummins, especially not the cummins. the 6.7 PSD would be my second choice. but i'd be in a dmax, and the numbers are impressive at least to me
idk I'd rather pick a company that been around a lot longer making diesels so Cummins it would be for me.
Old 11-18-2011, 08:52 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
lddrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cowboy
idk I'd rather pick a company that been around a lot longer making diesels so Cummins it would be for me.
is ten extremely successful years on the 6.6 not enough??

in the 90's cummins was king. once the 53 block crap started things went downhill. the early common rails had issues. all of the trans have issues in auto form. and the new 6.7 with all the emissions crap has had trouble just like the other two. and the I6 can't compete with the V8's power wise.

I know many a cummins man and i do respect their stuff, but they aren't covered in gold leaf like a lot of people think. they blow heads and have injectors **** the bed just like other trucks.

that being said the '12 cummins have some of the nicest interiors i've seen, dodge has really turned it around.
Old 11-18-2011, 08:58 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maineville Ohio
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

nope When you have Cummin's making diesel engine since 1929 for all kinds of applications.

All engines have their points of failure. I think ford made the wrong move when they went to the powerstroke from the international engines. And if CAT made a diesel engine small enough to put into a truck I would pick them too.


Quick Reply: Would you buy a diesel F150?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM.