Topic Sponsor
1987 - 1996 F150 Still running strong! Talk about your 8th and 9th generation Ford F150 trucks.

Electric Fan Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2018, 08:18 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
clintm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: St. Helens, Oregon
Posts: 719
Received 324 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

I don't think the e-fan / no e-fan debate will ever be decided one way or the other! But I do think if someone wants to give it a try, go right ahead! And if you don't want to, that's great too! Just giving the benefit of my experience with the fans if someone wants to know what I did!
The following 2 users liked this post by clintm6:
Eric Fullerton (05-07-2018), Lazarus-F150 (05-07-2018)
Old 05-07-2018, 08:37 PM
  #12  
Martin
 
sdmartin65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lehi, Utah
Posts: 3,035
Received 257 Likes on 221 Posts

Default

To answer the original question you need a relay for each fan you install and a decent controller. On my Efan setup I used Derale dual fans with shroud, this comes as a kit. I used a Dakota Digital controller. A junk yard car fan won't cut it when you put a load on or hook up a trailer. It just won't move enough air, the factory clutch system can move a lot of air when fully locked.

IMO only a couple scenarios make Efans worth the cost.
The truck has been hot rodded so efans free up power and keep the engine cool at low rpms.
The truck is driven in a hot climate and the efans keep air moving past the ac condenser. In this case a fan clutch might be locked most of the time driving and this kills power.
My truck was a combo of the two, it has a supercharger and in the summer the clutch fan would be locked most of the time. It really defeated adding the supercharger.
Old 05-07-2018, 08:40 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Lazarus-F150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 401
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Eric Fullerton
The E fan doesn't so much increase the fuel mileage, as free it up. Most of the time you don't need a fan at all, & controlled properly, the E-fan will stay off most of the time. The real win comes from removing the weight and drag from the stock fan. There is a valid argument; that the E-fan increases the maintenance frequency, and cost. The stock clutch fan might need replaced once or twice in the lifetime of the truck, & overall it is bullet proof. There is also the alternator upgrade, most of the stock ones are less than adequate for the increased draw of an E-fan, so unless you've already bumped to at least 130amp, include that in the cost.
Agreed completed on the e-fan(s) not needing to run all the time and removal of drag from the mechanical fan. I've already done the 130 amp 3G alternator upgrade (after the stock 2G alternator wiring caught on fire...).
Old 05-07-2018, 08:53 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Lazarus-F150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 401
Received 33 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by clintm6
The Control module wiring is not too difficult, and you only need one because it controls two fans on separate circuits with separate relays. The link I posted earlier was for a single fan, but this one is for dual fans: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/h...SABEgJw3_D_BwE
I used this fan kit https://ffdynamics.com/products/f15028 but I had repeated problems with their controller that's why I replaced it with the Hayden. But the fans work good and you can buy them separately
The instructions on the controller should tell you how to wire it up, but on my truck the black/yellow wire from the A/C compressor plug wired in to the green wire on the A/C circuit of the controller.
Also, I used this fitting in the upper radiator hose https://www.ebay.com/itm/44mm-or-1-3...72.m2749.l2649 and a screw in temperature sensor (can't find the link!).

I'm sure you can find a controller that comes with a threaded temp sensor unless you're comfortable using the probe through the radiator.
If you take a look at my album, you'll see some pics of the set-up I did, but feel free to ask for any help!
Do you have any suggestions for a dual fan assembly that is a little less expensive? Any junk yard or replacement options that I could use in stead to keep costs down?

Thanks!
Old 05-07-2018, 11:09 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Eric Fullerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 475
Received 65 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

https://www.buyautoparts.com/buynow/...RoCXTEQAvD_BwE

That or Mark VII or VIII e-fan from a Taurus or Lincoln just make sure it is a 2 speed unit
Old 05-07-2018, 11:29 PM
  #16  
Member

 
Steve83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Memphis, TN, Earth, Milky Way
Posts: 11,256
Received 1,731 Likes on 1,487 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Fullerton
I'm more concerned with the parasitic drag of 15 lbs on the water pump shaft being part of the rotating mass...
There is no drag - the fan catches the air passing through the radiator, and spins itself, even if the engine is OFF. So the mechanical fan is actually putting a TINY bit of torque back INTO the belt when it's not needed - an e-fan can't do that.

And 15lbs of rotating mass gives you that much more momentum to send down to the tires. It's like the flywheel - it HELPS keep the engine spinning, which propels the truck.
Originally Posted by clintm6
I don't think the e-fan / no e-fan debate will ever be decided...
Me either. So this discussion forum will always have some activity. How many threads can you find here that end with everyone saying "I'm glad we all agree - that topic has now been put to bed forever!"? Why should the topic of e-fans be different? But that doesn't mean we can't keep discussing it...
Old 05-08-2018, 11:54 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
BLDTruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,918
Received 489 Likes on 436 Posts
Default

Before I show off my ignorance in physics again, my first question would be this - does the output of the alternator correlate with the level of drag on the belt by the pulley? In other words, if the alternator is working harder, is it putting more drag on the belt and thus the engine?

It would seem to me that it would be more likely that an alternator is capable of putting out so much amperage at a given pulley rpm, and that the regulator reads the system voltage and dumps whatever excess that is not needed as heat energy. If that is the case, then it would argue in favor of the e-fan (for certain driving styles, not all), except for those speeds in which the clutch fan is actually providing a slight increase in torque.

(Takes cover in a bunker)
Old 05-08-2018, 11:56 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Eric Fullerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 475
Received 65 Likes on 60 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Steve83
There is no drag - the fan catches the air passing through the radiator, and spins itself, even if the engine is OFF. So the mechanical fan is actually putting a TINY bit of torque back INTO the belt when it's not needed - an e-fan can't do that.
And 15lbs of rotating mass gives you that much more momentum to send down to the tires. It's like the flywheel - it HELPS keep the engine spinning, which propels the truck.Me either.
Steve; you are likely one of the best Ford techs on the country, you certainly know how to gather and present useful information, but I suspect you didn't major in physics.
The flywheel effect is very minimal in the range used for cruising flat & level, Sprint cars don't use flywheels at all, since they never idle, or run at low RPMs, it all just parasitic drag to them. Lightening the flywheel has been a hot rodding staple since the get go, though in a heavy truck it is of questionable value. Still another 15lbs on the accessory rotational mass is more harm than good, you'd never miss it on drive-ability, but it would absorb power that could go to the rear wheels.
Old 05-08-2018, 09:03 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
clintm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: St. Helens, Oregon
Posts: 719
Received 324 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lazarus-F150
Do you have any suggestions for a dual fan assembly that is a little less expensive? Any junk yard or replacement options that I could use in stead to keep costs down?

Thanks!
I really only have experience with those I linked to, sorry! But since this is a critical system, I would stick with the best quality parts you can because you don't want to have the e-fan go out on you when you really need it! I'd stick with a good name brand controller at the very least, like Hayden, Derale or similar. Maybe someone else could suggest a good option for a JY fan.
Old 05-08-2018, 09:08 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
clintm6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: St. Helens, Oregon
Posts: 719
Received 324 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLDTruth
Before I show off my ignorance in physics again, my first question would be this - does the output of the alternator correlate with the level of drag on the belt by the pulley? In other words, if the alternator is working harder, is it putting more drag on the belt and thus the engine?

It would seem to me that it would be more likely that an alternator is capable of putting out so much amperage at a given pulley rpm, and that the regulator reads the system voltage and dumps whatever excess that is not needed as heat energy. If that is the case, then it would argue in favor of the e-fan (for certain driving styles, not all), except for those speeds in which the clutch fan is actually providing a slight increase in torque.

(Takes cover in a bunker)
I think you forgot to figure in the rotational torque of the earth's gravitational field, the Coriolis effect, and the summer solstice...

But that's just a guess...


Quick Reply: Electric Fan Question



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 PM.