Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

towing fifth wheel with F150

Old 10-14-2014, 02:45 PM
  #21  
ColdWar Vet-USN Shellback
 
RedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: STL area
Posts: 435
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Just let us know how that all works out for you when you get it set up and are running up and down the highway.
Old 10-14-2014, 03:13 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Ron AKA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedOne
Just let us know how that all works out for you when you get it set up and are running up and down the highway.
No problem. You do know that running 20" E tires (34" circumference) reduces your 3.73 rear end to an effective 3.29 ratio, and I will run 3.31 (on 30" circ. tires), so I will have a slight rpm advantage compared to your setup?
Old 10-14-2014, 05:46 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
5.0GN tow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,162
Received 211 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Ok been sitting watching this thread, and while my trailer is not a fifth wheel it is a Gooseneck. I think you will be fine, if you keep the size under control. Mine is about 7K loaded and can go much higher(it has a 16K plus max GVW). Mine is about 1k pin weight loaded and the stock truck just sits level when loaded with no bags etc. It is very stable and easy to tow with the 5.0L and 3.55 gears. As Ron AKA stated, usually the pin weight is pretty constant and increases slowly with load compared to a bumper pull. Might add that my load is pretty prone to instability since its live animals that weigh over 1200lbs each.

The thing I find funny is when i did a build on a 2015 that the max payload and tow now seem to be standard 6 lug wheels instead of 7 unless I missed something. This would seem to put in doubt the need for the 7 lugs for heavy duty use as long as you have the 9.75 rear end which most 2011 to 14s do.
Old 10-15-2014, 12:16 PM
  #24  
ColdWar Vet-USN Shellback
 
RedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: STL area
Posts: 435
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ron AKA
No problem. You do know that running 20" E tires (34" circumference) reduces your 3.73 rear end to an effective 3.29 ratio, and I will run 3.31 (on 30" circ. tires), so I will have a slight rpm advantage compared to your setup?
LT285/55R20 E rated with an overall diameter of 32.4"... why do you think I picked them???

No rpm advantage for you...

Thank You, very much!
Old 10-15-2014, 12:37 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.0GN tow
...
The thing I find funny is when i did a build on a 2015 that the max payload and tow now seem to be standard 6 lug wheels instead of 7 unless I missed something. This would seem to put in doubt the need for the 7 lugs for heavy duty use as long as you have the 9.75 rear end which most 2011 to 14s do.
Although now just 6 lugs, the HD Payload wheels must still be special. The 18" alloy wheels should still have a 2400# weight rating to meet the 4800# rear GAWR (like the old 7 lug wheels). I imagine the non-HD payload wheels are quite a bit lighter to save on weight and "rotating mass" (and with a lower weight rating).

With the 6 lug HD Payload 17" steel wheels, the rear GAWR is only 4550#. Maybe they could just get the 6 lug steel weight rating up to 2275# .
Old 10-15-2014, 01:26 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Ron AKA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedOne
LT285/55R20 E rated with an overall diameter of 32.4"
I guess Michelin must have discontinued your tires. The only E RATED 20" M/S2's I see at the Michelin site are LT275/65R20/E 126 R at 34". Also Tire Rack shows the OEM tires at 30".
Old 10-15-2014, 01:51 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ron AKA
I guess Michelin must have discontinued your tires. The only E RATED 20" M/S2's I see at the Michelin site are LT275/65R20/E 126 R at 34". Also Tire Rack shows the OEM tires at 30".
Yes, those used to exist, not sure about now.
Canadian Tire wanted $440 each when I was looking. .
Went down to the LT245/75-R17 for $270 ea instead.
Old 10-15-2014, 07:54 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Ron AKA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 310
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brulaz
Yes, those used to exist, not sure about now.
Canadian Tire wanted $440 each when I was looking. .
Went down to the LT245/75-R17 for $270 ea instead.

Yes, there seems to be an amazing rule in tire pricing. The price is inversely proportional to the amount of rubber in the tire. I just put set of Michelin M/S2 tires on my F150 truck for just over $600 at Costco (set of four, not one tire!). 15" tires with way more rubber than you find on an 18" or 20". This "large" tire fad is just a way of sucking more $$'s out of vehicle owners.
Old 10-15-2014, 09:48 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ron AKA
Yes, there seems to be an amazing rule in tire pricing. The price is inversely proportional to the amount of rubber in the tire. I just put set of Michelin M/S2 tires on my F150 truck for just over $600 at Costco (set of four, not one tire!). 15" tires with way more rubber than you find on an 18" or 20". This "large" tire fad is just a way of sucking more $$'s out of vehicle owners.
Wait, 15" wheels on an F150?
Old 10-16-2014, 08:47 AM
  #30  
ColdWar Vet-USN Shellback
 
RedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: STL area
Posts: 435
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ron AKA
I guess Michelin must have discontinued your tires. The only E RATED 20" M/S2's I see at the Michelin site are LT275/65R20/E 126 R at 34". Also Tire Rack shows the OEM tires at 30".
NO, they still do...they are the LTX® A/T2 tires not the MS2. http://www.michelinman.com/tire-sele...ails#techspecs

And it diameter is 32.4" with the factory ones being P275/55R20 at 31.9".

Last edited by RedOne; 10-16-2014 at 08:50 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: towing fifth wheel with F150



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 PM.