Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My Towing MPG premium vs 87

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2018, 09:32 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Robwatford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default My Towing MPG premium vs 87

I just got back from a 1800 mile round trip to Smoky Mountain National Park in my 2018 Screw 3.5 EB towing our 4000lb camper.

Both ways I ran about 65Mph in tow/haul, but ran premium on the way down and regular on the return. In general premium was about 60cents more expensive.

On the way down I got 9.6mpg and 9.4 on the return. So no gas savings and as far as power goes there may have been a difference but I had plenty of power running on 87.

So 87 for me from now on.

My Towing MPG premium vs 87-photo806.jpg

My Towing MPG premium vs 87-photo101.jpg
The following 3 users liked this post by Robwatford:
altarocks (04-11-2018), BCMIF150 (04-08-2018), BigDozer66 (04-11-2018)
Old 04-08-2018, 11:16 AM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Robwatford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Thanks I haven't seen that. Could have saved myself a few $$$.
Old 04-11-2018, 10:54 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,076
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Surprising as you should feel the extra 35 lbs torque and 13 Horsepower addition that the 93 octane has as seen here.
Old 04-11-2018, 11:05 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Robwatford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
Surprising as you should feel the extra 35 lbs torque and 13 Horsepower addition that the 93 octane has as seen here.
It did have more power, but I wasn't lacking power on 87, at least not enough to justify the cost.
Old 04-12-2018, 11:51 AM
  #5  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

I get 2-3mpg better running 93 while towing, reason being is it can maintain gear better due to the additional torque thanks to advanced ignition timing on the 93. Should be virtually the same on the '18s. Lot of other variables apply but in the mountains, if the route was different in any way or more uphill than not, that could definitely affect your results.
Old 04-12-2018, 12:47 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Ryan_2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Northern BC
Posts: 807
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

I also find regardless of fuel / driving conditions / etc I always get worse fuel mileage on the way home......something about 'getting home' makes me drive more aggressively lol
The following 3 users liked this post by Ryan_2020:
Enoch (04-12-2018), homeskizzle (04-12-2018), UnkLeRaRa (04-12-2018)
Old 04-12-2018, 01:27 PM
  #7  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Robwatford
On the way down I got 9.6mpg and 9.4 on the return. So no gas savings and as far as power goes there may have been a difference but I had plenty of power running on 87.

So 87 for me from now on.
I did a similar test a few years ago when my 3.5L EcoBoost was newer. My MPG improved enough using premium that I just about broke even on the cost of gas. My EcoBoost seems to be happier running premium when towing. Less downshifting for grades, slightly less coolant temp. So for long towing trips with my TT or cargo trailer, because it doesn't cost me more I run premium.

Last edited by smokeywren; 04-13-2018 at 07:06 PM.
Old 04-12-2018, 04:28 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
untraceable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 425
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

You may have noticed more if the outside air temps where hotter.

The performance gain may be sight anyways. Most people are not towing at acceleration rates/speeds that tax the motors that hard anyways.
Old 04-12-2018, 05:08 PM
  #9  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by untraceable
You may have noticed more if the outside air temps where hotter.

The performance gain may be sight anyways. Most people are not towing at acceleration rates/speeds that tax the motors that hard anyways.
it makes more power in all conditions with higher octane fuel. At cruise under load, it'll make more torque in gear at rpm, which may be enough torque to prevent what would otherwise require a downshift on lower octane fuel.
Old 04-13-2018, 10:23 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
mass-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,938
Received 897 Likes on 680 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BadAltitude
There was a credible study referenced on this forum months ago which analyzed mpg for various vehicles using premium vs regular gas. The 2017 3.5EB had the greatest benefit using premium, but improved mpg only 5%. Since premium costs 10-20% more there isn’t economic justification to use it. Your numbers are the same as the study.
Was that study while towing? I imagine under load the higher octane fuel may have a larger effect since just cruising around town isnt putting the engine under a whole lot of stress.

For the last few months there has only been a $0.10 split between 87 octane and 91 octane here, so I have been running 91. Its like a 3% increase in cost.


Quick Reply: My Towing MPG premium vs 87



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 AM.