Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need new tires for towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016, 08:15 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brulaz
I've had Michelon LTX MS/2 LT-E's for about 50K miles mostly towing and have been running them at 60 psi, rotated every 10K miles. Do like them a lot but they all are wearing too much on the sides like they are under-inflated. (My axle weights are much less than they can support at 60 psi.)

Maybe you have to run these LT-Es at their max 80 psi to wear evenly? I'll be upping the psi on these to see if I can get more miles out of them.

And if you want to run at 50 psi, you might get better wear out of an LT-C tire, or an LT-D at 65psi (their max psi's)?
I am not even sure if the rims are rated for 80 psi
Old 02-14-2016, 08:21 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acadianbob
Check tirerack.com for tires. You will see what's available and see other people's ratings for each tire.

Also, I don't see HD payload package on your sig. Some of your issue might be your truck's payload capacity versus the actual pin weight of your 5th wheel.

HD package wasn't available in '15 and still not here for '16. I have max tow and airbags. I don't think that the heavier leaf springs or axles of the HD package would help. My previous '11 and 13' ecoboosts had Wrangler AT/S load range C, max tow, air bags and I had no sway issues with a gooseneck loaded with hay and weights of 10-12k lbs. Only difference is the new lighter body but I am not sure how that effects it. You would think that having 1700 lbs of pin weight would replace any weight missing from the truck
Old 02-14-2016, 08:23 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
I am not even sure if the rims are rated for 80 psi
Nor am I.
Some say yea, some say no.
Others have not had any problem, so guess I'll find out.
Old 02-14-2016, 09:45 AM
  #14  
Found On Road Dominating
 
Bill_The_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 1,360
Received 187 Likes on 152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
I am not even sure if the rims are rated for 80 psi
seem like we had this conversation before. Think they are. Well I'll assume that based on 2014 rims.
Old 02-14-2016, 09:53 AM
  #15  
Found On Road Dominating
 
Bill_The_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 1,360
Received 187 Likes on 152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
HD package wasn't available in '15 and still not here for '16. I have max tow and airbags. I don't think that the heavier leaf springs or axles of the HD package would help. My previous '11 and 13' ecoboosts had Wrangler AT/S load range C, max tow, air bags and I had no sway issues with a gooseneck loaded with hay and weights of 10-12k lbs. Only difference is the new lighter body but I am not sure how that effects it. You would think that having 1700 lbs of pin weight would replace any weight missing from the truck
the axels are smaller and the GAWR is less. If you have HD payload then you get last generation Axels ( non HD payload) as I had on the 2012 ecoscrew Lariat with max tow. If you get the HD this year you get last years axel and 3.73 In an effort to increase MPG we lost the ability to tow like before (unless you're willing to sacrifice options). It's all smoke and mirrors to protect the reputation of the EB. IMHO
Old 02-14-2016, 10:37 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill_The_PA
the axels are smaller and the GAWR is less. If you have HD payload then you get last generation Axels ( non HD payload) as I had on the 2012 ecoscrew Lariat with max tow. If you get the HD this year you get last years axel and 3.73 In an effort to increase MPG we lost the ability to tow like before (unless you're willing to sacrifice options). It's all smoke and mirrors to protect the reputation of the EB. IMHO
The "standard" axles are the same as last year's, you just can't get 3.73 any more unless you go with the HD package. Ford derated the axles from 4050 lbs to 3800 lbs as they lowered the GVWR on the new trucks. The HD axle is still heavier but no longer has 7 lugs. Now I believe both have 6 lugs.

Now back to our discussion on tires. Any more suggestions on LT tires preferably C range? I still can't find any D's and am afraid that if I go with E's the truck will ride like my Super Duty. My nephew got a new Tacoma about the time I got my new Ford. I drove his and it rode like crap. I then noticed it had BFG's on it- E load range!

What about the Cooper Discoverer AT3 in C vs E?
Old 02-14-2016, 12:59 PM
  #17  
Found On Road Dominating
 
Bill_The_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 1,360
Received 187 Likes on 152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndeerefarmer
The "standard" axles are the same as last year's, you just can't get 3.73 any more unless you go with the HD package. Ford derated the axles from 4050 lbs to 3800 lbs as they lowered the GVWR on the new trucks. The HD axle is still heavier but no longer has 7 lugs. Now I believe both have 6 lugs. Now back to our discussion on tires. Any more suggestions on LT tires preferably C range? I still can't find any D's and am afraid that if I go with E's the truck will ride like my Super Duty. My nephew got a new Tacoma about the time I got my new Ford. I drove his and it rode like crap. I then noticed it had BFG's on it- E load range! What about the Cooper Discoverer AT3 in C vs E?
we'll I'll leave the axels for now. You didn't answer what your towing wt or habits are so I'll assume standard "C" rated will do so. As I stated before either the Wrangler or Cooper would be excellent. They both have great reviews. I suppose the wrangler would be better the Kevlar and your dealership might have som takeoffs.

Just for my understanding. how is it the axles were derated. I find it hard to believe that a beefier axel a slightly stronger rim (6-spoke Machined Aluminum 18" x 7.5" with max wheel load capacity of 2101 lbs vs 1825 lbs) 6 lugs vs 7 and one leave spring added (3+1 vs 2+1) frame thickness although a slight difference the yield strength remains 49,300 psi. I think there different ant the HD are as I had in my 2012. I don't think Ford would make two new axles when they already had 1 perfectly good axel / hub assembly. The old (mine) and the new "HD" seem to be the same in all aspects including the 3.73:1 ratio with 9.75 HD ring gear.
Old 02-14-2016, 01:13 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill_The_PA
we'll I'll leave the axels for now. You didn't answer what your towing wt or habits are so I'll assume standard "C" rated will do so. As I stated before either the Wrangler or Cooper would be excellent. They both have great reviews. I suppose the wrangler would be better the Kevlar and your dealership might have som takeoffs.

Just for my understanding. how is it the axles were derated. I find it hard to believe that a beefier axel a slightly stronger rim (6-spoke Machined Aluminum 18" x 7.5" with max wheel load capacity of 2101 lbs vs 1825 lbs) 6 lugs vs 7 and one leave spring added (3+1 vs 2+1) frame thickness although a slight difference the yield strength remains 49,300 psi. I think there different ant the HD are as I had in my 2012. I don't think Ford would make two new axles when they already had 1 perfectly good axel / hub assembly. The old (mine) and the new "HD" seem to be the same in all aspects including the 3.73:1 ratio with 9.75 HD ring gear.
The non hd axle of the 11-14 models had their rating reduced from 4050 lbs to 3800 lbs when they put them on the 15's and 16s with no changes made to the axles other than no longer offering 3.73's. This was to make the math right for the new lower GVWR.
Like you said the old generation hd axle had 7 lugs, a thicker axle shaft and hd ring gear. Now the hd has 6 lugs, a hd ring gear and I am not sure about the axle shaft itself. The "old" hd was rated at 4800 lbs as is the "new". It's just the standard axle that was reduced in capacity.



Quick Reply: Need new tires for towing



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.