Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

f150 3.5 vs f250 6.7 long run reliability and maintenance costs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2013, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Guy Lawless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by User-One
In short what is more cost effective with maintenance and reliability, buying a f150 ecoboost towing 10-11k pounds on a regular basis (80% of the time). Or a f250 6.7 diesel towing 13-14k pounds. This truck is going to be going cross-country 60-80k miles a year.

The f250 is almost twice with cost, will it go twice the distance in its life compared to the f150?
I've seen some horror stories with the ford's diesels self destructing and totalling the engine. Also maintance seems to cost an arm and a leg, 5k there 7k here, etc.
Will the f150 suck more fuel and work harder but be more reliable and not cost near as much to repair nearing 250k miles.

Thanks for your insight guys.

I come from the "diesel world," I suppose, as I traded my 2006 F-350 DRW in on a 2013 F-150.

Yes, I did have a problematic 6.0. Between talking to people at camp sites, dealerships, and the mechanics that have worked on my truck the 6.4 and the 6.7 aren't any better. In fact, some of the repairs are more expensive because it requires a cab removal due to the engine placement.

I "downgraded" to an F-150 because I, firstly, wanted to stay with Ford, and second the new F-150s have enough towing capacity to tow my RV which before just straddled inbetween the very high end of a 150 and the low to mid end of a 250.

Personally, if I were set on getting a diesel today I'd look at Dodge and steer clear of Ford SuperDuty. But I'm happy with my F-150 and the power it provides.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:36 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Guy Lawless

I come from the "diesel world," I suppose, as I traded my 2006 F-350 DRW in on a 2013 F-150.

Yes, I did have a problematic 6.0. Between talking to people at camp sites, dealerships, and the mechanics that have worked on my truck the 6.4 and the 6.7 aren't any better. In fact, some of the repairs are more expensive because it requires a cab removal due to the engine placement.

I "downgraded" to an F-150 because I, firstly, wanted to stay with Ford, and second the new F-150s have enough towing capacity to tow my RV which before just straddled inbetween the very high end of a 150 and the low to mid end of a 250.

Personally, if I were set on getting a diesel today I'd look at Dodge and steer clear of Ford SuperDuty. But I'm happy with my F-150 and the power it provides.
Puff puff pass bro
Old 05-02-2013, 09:39 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
atvtinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 158
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Obviously you haven't heard of all the problems they are having with the Dodge diesels not lasting 200,000 miles before a major breakdown. I have one of the '11 Ford F-250s with the 6.7L diesel and have yet to have it in the shop for any kind of work nor have any of the people that I know that have them. The guy that just replaced the roof on my house just had to take his Dodge back for a second re-build due to the cams failing on his and he only has 125,000 miles on his truck! And from what I heard, Dodge is still having problems with the input shaft still snapping if you tow anything close to capacity. 10 year old problem still not solved!
Old 05-02-2013, 09:40 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
DaveCaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

brulaz, willieboy, smokeywren,
Thanks so much for the replies. You've given me great info. About the 16.5% tongue weight: yes, I wish it was lower. The payload of the trailer is totally fixed in place (it's a search-and-rescue training maze that's bolted in place and I can't redistribute). But the other thing is that I guess I should find a better way to measure the tongue weight. I used a lever-arm method and a bathroom scale (something like this: http://hildstrom.com/projects/tonguescale/index.html)

Now that I think about it more, it's probably pretty important that I put the tongue at the height that I'll actually be using it, since the trailer is dual axle and tipping the trailer forward or back would transfer the weight between the two axles. How do you guys measure the tongue weight?

Thanks again,
Dave
Old 05-02-2013, 09:50 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
brulaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Received 204 Likes on 178 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DaveCaver
...
How do you guys measure the tongue weight?
I load everything up, including wife, and go to a CAT scale.
http://catscale.com/cat-scale-locator

Measure everything together. Then get off the scale, drop the trailer, and measure truck only.

The difference in totals is your trailer's GVW or total weight.
Subtract the trailer's axle weight as measured in the first run-through, and you'll have tongue weight.

If you have a WDH, you'll do the above with the WDH slacked. You can also run through a 3rd time with the WDH setup and see how it moves weight off the truck's rear axle and onto the trailer's axles and the truck's front axle.
Old 05-02-2013, 03:58 PM
  #16  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DaveCaver
How do you guys measure the tongue weight?
With a Sherline tongue weight scale:

http://www.etrailer.com/Tools/Sherline/5780.html

Stack up lumber as a jackbase so when the trailer tongue jack is lowered so the coupler goes down onto the scale, the floor of the trailer will be close to level, front to rear.

I use short pieces of scrap 2x6, 2x8, 2x10, even 2x12 for the jack base under the Sherline scale. Jack the tongue jack up so the coupler is a few inches higher than the jack, then place the jack base and scale under the coupler. Then lower the tongue jack so he coupler fits onto the scale, and you'll get an accurate tongue weight.

But if you don't want to spend $125 for a tongue weight scale, then run the rig across a CAT scale twice, once with the trailer (but without the WD spring bars tightened) and once without the trailer. GVW = the combined weight on the two truck axles. Subtract the GVW without the trailer from the GVW with the trailer. The difference is tongue weight.

brulaz's use of gross trailer weight minus trailer axle weight will work too.

Last edited by smokeywren; 05-02-2013 at 04:12 PM.
Old 05-02-2013, 07:43 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
mflinehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Find yourself a good 7.3 powerstroke. They're still out there with lower miles.
Old 05-02-2013, 08:52 PM
  #18  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mflinehan
Find yourself a good 7.3 powerstroke. They're still out there with lower miles.
The last one was assembled in October, 2002. Over 10 years ago. Very few 10-year-old-pickups are going to be reliable, regardless of miles or TLC. Yeah, the 7.3L engine will probably last over 400,000 miles, but the rest of the pickup is just an ordinary Ford. Brakes, axles, springs, shocks, transmissions, driveshafts, altenator, air conditioning compressor, water pump, an other components will continue to fall apart.

I bought a brand new '99.5 7.3L and drove it 197,000 miles over 11 years. I installed a bulletproof BTS tranny, which today costs about $5,000. I replaced the stock intake with a Ford Severe Duty Air Induction System (AIS), had a 4" turbo-back free-flow exhaust system, an changed the oil about every 5,500 miles per oil analysis. I ran a DP-Tuner 60-tow tune and drug an 8,000-pound 5er most of those miles. When I sold it, it was still running like new. But I knew that normal wear items were going to begin going south, so I gave it up.

Last edited by smokeywren; 05-02-2013 at 08:56 PM.
Old 05-03-2013, 09:02 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
mflinehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Smokey you are right once again.
Old 05-03-2013, 10:06 AM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
DaveCaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your great input, smokeywren.
Originally Posted by smokeywren
The last one was assembled in October, 2002. Over 10 years ago. Very few 10-year-old-pickups are going to be reliable, regardless of miles or TLC.
Of course, I've convinced myself that what I really need is an Excursion (I really need the extra seats much more than I need the truck bed). It looks like Ford stopped making these in 2005. Should I just not consider these, or should I get one with low miles? What would you consider low miles? I've seen them with 67k, 39k, etc. Also, the 2005's that I see only have the 6.0L engine. Should I worry about that engine's reliability? Thanks again for all of the help.

Last edited by DaveCaver; 05-03-2013 at 10:12 AM.


Quick Reply: f150 3.5 vs f250 6.7 long run reliability and maintenance costs?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08 PM.