Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

355 vs 373 Towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2014, 02:55 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,067
Received 531 Likes on 395 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
And your engine. The 5.0 has less ow end torque than the ecoboost or 6.2. It needs gears to pull better because of the lack or low end torque.
Not necessarily true. Test drove a 2014 F250 6.2L and it had less torque to weight ratio than the 5.0L. With the same torque to weight ratio as the F250 6.2L, put on my truck, the torque would only be 325 lbs at a higher 4500 rpm. YET that F250 had a towing capacity of 12,500 lbs.

Tow ratings are not based off of performance. They are based off overheating and chassis capability though.

With the 5.0L trucks, that engine is smaller creating more heat. If Ford would had just put a larger radiator or higher performing coolant in there, the tow rating could had been higher. But why would they, when they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.

Having a higher ratio axle will create more torque where the engine will have to work less, and not create as much heat. That's why tow ratings go up on most any engine with better gearing.
Old 04-13-2014, 04:59 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
nihilus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 644
Received 86 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by durant
No offense intended, but I think that the 3.55 is for those folks (and they are many) who use their pickups like cars.
Years ago I had an F150, a '68 with the 240cid and three on the tree. I believe that it had a 3.7 ratio. It was about perfect. Durant
Thumbs down
Old 04-13-2014, 07:23 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,060
Received 159 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
With the 5.0L trucks, that engine is smaller creating more heat. If Ford would had just put a larger radiator or higher performing coolant in there, the tow rating could had been higher. But why would they, when they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.
With that logic, given a big enough radiator, you could pull with a 4 cylinder. The real magic is in the torque produced and the RPM at which it is produced.
Old 04-13-2014, 08:48 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Dirttracker18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Slate River, ON
Posts: 1,331
Received 281 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
Not necessarily true. Test drove a 2014 F250 6.2L and it had less torque to weight ratio than the 5.0L. With the same torque to weight ratio as the F250 6.2L, put on my truck, the torque would only be 325 lbs at a higher 4500 rpm. YET that F250 had a towing capacity of 12,500 lbs.

Tow ratings are not based off of performance. They are based off overheating and chassis capability though.

With the 5.0L trucks, that engine is smaller creating more heat. If Ford would had just put a larger radiator or higher performing coolant in there, the tow rating could had been higher. But why would they, when they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.

Having a higher ratio axle will create more torque where the engine will have to work less, and not create as much heat. That's why tow ratings go up on most any engine with better gearing.
Old 04-14-2014, 11:20 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
EcoboostKev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 675
Received 127 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up

With the 5.0L trucks, that engine is smaller creating more heat. If Ford would had just put a larger radiator or higher performing coolant in there, the tow rating could had been higher. But why would they, when they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.
You have everything figured out Mike! Ford can't get anything past you....
Old 04-15-2014, 10:04 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
...they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.....
Umm... the intercooler has nothing to do with engine temperature
Old 04-15-2014, 11:27 AM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
uzikaduzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,092
Received 147 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

I don't mean to be rude but I disagree with some of your statements...

Originally Posted by Mike Up
Tow ratings are not based off of performance. They are based off overheating and chassis capability though.
I think to be fair here, we don't know what ford uses to to create their tow capacity ratings until they adopt the standardization in 2015; however, performance has to be somewhat on their mind... it may not be very high on their mind but still there

Originally Posted by Mike Up
With the 5.0L trucks, that engine is smaller creating more heat. If Ford would had just put a larger radiator or higher performing coolant in there, the tow rating could had been higher. But why would they, when they're trying to push their little turbo V6 that has an oversized radiator and intercooler to keep temps down.
A larger block could and does to some extent dissipate heat better; however, with the larger displacement, they are using more fuel and creating more heat to displace so I think you likely have a wash here.

The intercooler with the eco is likely causing it to run hotter. colder denser air has more oxygen and therefore more energy. that increased energy is going to produce more heat during combustion. also, i'm not sure to what extent (because i don't own an eco) but i'd bet the intercooler partially blocks the radiator... so you are per-heating the air flowing over the radiator by pushing it through the intercooler first. So a bigger radiator is necessary but not because the engine is smaller.

Originally Posted by Mike Up
Having a higher ratio axle will create more torque where the engine will have to work less, and not create as much heat. That's why tow ratings go up on most any engine with better gearing.
gearing does not change the torque the engine produces but does change the feel of that torque. gas engines produce the most of their power at higher rpms, with lower gearing you are able to turn the motor more times per wheel revolution giving you a mechanical advantage at the cost of running the engine at higher rpms (which means more gas and likely MORE heat)

If i had to guess what goes into a tow capacity rating, I'd say all of it. suspension, the entire driveline, braking, gearing, cooling, frame, and maybe even length.
Old 04-15-2014, 02:00 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by uzikaduzi
I... i'm not sure to what extent (because i don't own an eco) but i'd bet the intercooler partially blocks the radiator... so you are per-heating the air flowing over the radiator by pushing it through the intercooler first. ...
Just to confirm, the intercooler sits in front of, but just below, the main radiator. I don't believe it restricts airflow through the main radiator in any significant way.
The following 2 users liked this post by schmenke:
uzikaduzi (04-15-2014), wkelly (11-08-2014)



Quick Reply: 355 vs 373 Towing



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.