3300 pounds of payload w/pics
#12
#13
Your Mod Superstore!
It's a urea based additive to help the catalytic converter break down NOx. This is the stuff that VW wanted to avoid, claiming that they could make their diesels efficient enough without it... You can see how that worked out for them.
#15
Senior Member
DEF actually cuts the miles per gallon by 1 or 2 mpgs depending on the weight of the cargo load. It' might make the exhaust cleaner and safer on the way out, but you have to burn more fuel overall. In one word, Politics. Same as the additional diesel fuel tax.
#16
DEF will kill my fuel mileage.
Quite the contrary. Because the manufacturer is able to tune the engine any way it wants to, and then allow the SCR and DEF to take care of the pollutants, most manufacturers have discovered better fuel mileage (compared to other smog-reduction systems). Truckmakers claim it improves fuel mileage by as much as 5 percent.
#17
Senior Member
Well per pickuptrucks.com and the manufacturers, this may not be true.
DEF will kill my fuel mileage.
Quite the contrary. Because the manufacturer is able to tune the engine any way it wants to, and then allow the SCR and DEF to take care of the pollutants, most manufacturers have discovered better fuel mileage (compared to other smog-reduction systems). Truckmakers claim it improves fuel mileage by as much as 5 percent.
DEF will kill my fuel mileage.
Quite the contrary. Because the manufacturer is able to tune the engine any way it wants to, and then allow the SCR and DEF to take care of the pollutants, most manufacturers have discovered better fuel mileage (compared to other smog-reduction systems). Truckmakers claim it improves fuel mileage by as much as 5 percent.
http://www.thedieselstop.com/forums/...ievers-300825/
Good friend of mine just bought a 2012 Duramax, drove it from Tulsa to Duncan, OK, which is roughly 200 miles and 95% of the time it was @ 75mph. Truck was bone stock apart from an Edge tuner set on ECO. He did a 5 inch straightpipe with stock downpipe, egr block off, and an H&S Minimaxx. Truck averaged 13.0 towing an Cadillac Escalade EXT from Duncan, OK to Dallas, TX on a tandem axle bumper pull. On the way back, unloaded.... it ran 18.5mpg. Mind you, it's an 8,000lb 4x4 Dually with 4.30 rears.
#18
Senior Member
I'm just going by my real world experiences I have with our older vs newer diesels. I can say I have not seen any increase in mpg but only a slight decrease running the same roads with the same loads. The only variable is some of the trucks are PRE-DEF diesel and some are newer models requiring DEF.
No trying to argue but just stating my opinion on the last 30 plus years of driving.
No trying to argue but just stating my opinion on the last 30 plus years of driving.
#19
Wellll what they claim and real world results are two different things.
http://www.thedieselstop.com/forums/...ievers-300825/
Good friend of mine just bought a 2012 Duramax, drove it from Tulsa to Duncan, OK, which is roughly 200 miles and 95% of the time it was @ 75mph. Truck was bone stock apart from an Edge tuner set on ECO. He did a 5 inch straightpipe with stock downpipe, egr block off, and an H&S Minimaxx. Truck averaged 13.0 towing an Cadillac Escalade EXT from Duncan, OK to Dallas, TX on a tandem axle bumper pull. On the way back, unloaded.... it ran 18.5mpg. Mind you, it's an 8,000lb 4x4 Dually with 4.30 rears.
http://www.thedieselstop.com/forums/...ievers-300825/
Good friend of mine just bought a 2012 Duramax, drove it from Tulsa to Duncan, OK, which is roughly 200 miles and 95% of the time it was @ 75mph. Truck was bone stock apart from an Edge tuner set on ECO. He did a 5 inch straightpipe with stock downpipe, egr block off, and an H&S Minimaxx. Truck averaged 13.0 towing an Cadillac Escalade EXT from Duncan, OK to Dallas, TX on a tandem axle bumper pull. On the way back, unloaded.... it ran 18.5mpg. Mind you, it's an 8,000lb 4x4 Dually with 4.30 rears.
A friend has a deleted 6.7 Cummins and gets about 19 or so at 75 too.