Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7 Eco and Towing Capability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2015, 08:40 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Dirttracker18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Slate River, ON
Posts: 1,331
Received 281 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kenferg1
I got the 3.5 because I wanted the baddest stock engine Ford puts in its trucks. Want more power? A $500 tuner adds 30+ horsepower and almost 100 lb/ft of torque. It's the best deal out there. The 2.7 is no different. It is a beast of an engine with the same tuning option. There is so much potential in each of these engines. 30 years ago the very notion of this type of power without building an esoteric engine that cost $10k or more was a fantasy. Now, just like back in the 60s, you can walk in and buy that power stock in almost any Ford vehicle. Amazing. Chevy ain't doing it. Dodge ain't doing it. But Ford is. And I love it!
Agreed! We had amazing power in the 60's that was lost in the late 70's and 80's. In the 90's they seemed to be building back up again. Today we are seeing more power with less fuel usage than in the 60's. Powerful vehicles are back in stock form. I just wish I could afford one
The following users liked this post:
Kenferg1 (12-18-2015)
Old 12-18-2015, 11:31 AM
  #22  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dirttracker18
Agreed! We had amazing power in the 60's that was lost in the late 70's and 80's.

Try early 70's. My carpool buddy bought a new 1973 Ford pickup with 429 engine. That pickup was a dog. Less power than an earlier 351 V8. Anti-smog tuning before Ford engineers figured out how to do it right ruined that formerly powerful hot-rod engine.
Old 12-18-2015, 11:40 AM
  #23  
Member
 
texasproud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 98
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tanked_darren
Laugh, but alot of people defend the 5.0 as tried and true like its from the 90's when in reality its slightly newer than the 3.5 Ecoboost.
y'all do realize that engine is quite a bit older than the ecoboost right??? It was put in 69 mustangs...
Old 12-18-2015, 12:05 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Jason_Larsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Klamath Falls
Posts: 511
Received 132 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by texasproud
y'all do realize that engine is quite a bit older than the ecoboost right??? It was put in 69 mustangs...
The ford 302 Windsor and the 5.0 coyote share nothing in common except marketing
The following 2 users liked this post by Jason_Larsen:
130428 (12-21-2015), Kenferg1 (12-18-2015)
Old 12-21-2015, 03:38 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
RES4CUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Manassas Va
Posts: 9,300
Received 1,523 Likes on 1,203 Posts
Default

Jesus, there is so much ignorance. A little research wild help many here.

I tow 7K with my little 4.6 3V with 3.73 ratio and it doesn't struggle and feels fine so I'm sure the newer little sister of he all mighty ecoboost will do fine.
The following users liked this post:
smurfs_of_war (12-21-2015)
Old 02-14-2016, 09:46 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Nighthawk87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,573
Received 237 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Ok. Can someone please confirm this trailer will be safely towed?

Keystone Hideout 26lh
ULVW: 5,958
Cargo Cap: 1,662
GVWR: 7620

Truck: 2016 2.7l with payload package and tow package
Payload is 1716
Tow Rating is 8,200 I believe

Use: camping in Big Bear and other mountainous areas at about 6000' or less. We will go about once a month but maybe not always to the mountains.

I commute 96 miles a day which is why I didn't want to go with the 3.5L. Everything I read basically states the 2.7L towa great.


It'll be my wife,me, and three kids under 5. 2.7 Eco and Towing Capability-image-1757121629.jpg

Last edited by Nighthawk87; 02-14-2016 at 10:03 PM.
Old 02-14-2016, 10:16 PM
  #27  
Found On Road Dominating
 
Bill_The_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 1,360
Received 187 Likes on 152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nighthawk87
Ok. Can someone please confirm this trailer will be safely towed? Keystone Hideout 26lh Truck: 2016 2.7l with payload package and tow package Payload is 1716 It'll be my wife,me, and three kids under 5.
without any further information I'd say your GTG. Good to go. You won't run out of payload from my calculations.
Old 02-14-2016, 10:55 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Jason_Larsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Klamath Falls
Posts: 511
Received 132 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I started my search with the keystone hideout and ended up buying a 2015 cougar halfton 26bhswe (I'm going to sell it BTW). I noticed the hideouts have a higher dry weight due to the all wood construction vs the cougar. I'm at 7000 with ready to camp before water. That's just wife and one kid.

Check the dry weight to GVWR as cargo will add up fast. You don't want to overload the trailer as well.

Originally Posted by Nighthawk87
Ok. Can someone please confirm this trailer will be safely towed?

Keystone Hideout 26lh
ULVW: 5,958
Cargo Cap: 1,662
GVWR: 7620

Truck: 2016 2.7l with payload package and tow package
Payload is 1716
Tow Rating is 8,200 I believe

Use: camping in Big Bear and other mountainous areas at about 6000' or less. We will go about once a month but maybe not always to the mountains.

I commute 96 miles a day which is why I didn't want to go with the 3.5L. Everything I read basically states the 2.7L towa great.


It'll be my wife,me, and three kids under 5. Attachment 415619
Old 02-14-2016, 10:56 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Jason_Larsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Klamath Falls
Posts: 511
Received 132 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Just saw you posted the dry weight.


Originally Posted by Jason_Larsen
I started my search with the keystone hideout and ended up buying a 2015 cougar halfton 26bhswe (I'm going to sell it BTW). I noticed the hideouts have a higher dry weight due to the all wood construction vs the cougar. I'm at 7000 with ready to camp before water. That's just wife and one kid.

Check the dry weight to GVWR as cargo will add up fast. You don't want to overload the trailer as well.
Old 02-15-2016, 12:39 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Velosprout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 1,005
Received 208 Likes on 168 Posts

Default

I would suggest the 3.5 EcoBoost as a first choice, and order the Heavy Duty Payload package. My trailer weighs less than yours, but with six people in the truck, luggage, bedrug, tonneau, and the hitch, a non-heavy duty payload package truck will be overloaded for me. Second choice would be the 5.0. also with the HDD. I wouldn't suggest the 2.7 or the 3.5 NA for your purposes. It's not that it could do the job, but not ideal. The main reason is that you can't get the Heavy Duty Payload Package/Max Tow on a 2.7.

Your three kids under 5 grow up very fast, will weigh more, and will be bringing along a lot more stuff when you travel. You may decide to upgrade campers as they grow. Having too much truck is a problem that you can live with. Having not enough truck is a mistake that will be expensive to solve; trading prematurely for a bigger truck, or trying all manner of after-market fixes that are both expensive, of unknown value, and void warranties.


Quick Reply: 2.7 Eco and Towing Capability



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.