Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

10 speed F150 axle ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2016, 11:12 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
atwowheelguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 482
Received 129 Likes on 107 Posts

Default 10 speed F150 axle ratios

I'm considering a 10 speed F150. My '13 3.5 Ecoboost 3.55 axle 2WD Supercrew short bed is darn near perfect for my one and only cage transportation and tow vehicle. It performs very well. I have weighed it twice while towing. Once the toy hauler was 6700 lbs. with 780 tongue weight with GCW of 12,920 and once it was 7100 lbs. with 800 tongue weight and GCW of 13,260. On the first one the rear truck axle was 50 lbs. under the GAWR and on the second time it was 70 lbs. over the GAWR. In both cases there was some cargo in the truck that could have gone in the camper. My only reason for trading would be to get a little more payload. The '13 has 1607 lbs. payload and is rated for 15,300 GCWR.

For the configuration I want, the only two axles available for the '17 are 3.15 and 3.55. It looks like with the 10 speed transmission, the 3.15 axle 1st gear is about the same as the 3.55 axle ratio with the 6 speed (equivalent to a 3.54 actually). With the 10 speed, the 3.55 1st gear is the same as the 6 speed would be with a 3.99 axle ratio. The 3.15 has a GCWR of 15,800 and the 3.55 has a GCWR of 17,000 (max tow). It looks like I would get about the same towing capability with a 3.15 in the 10 speed as I have now with a 3.55 in the 6 speed. Actually the 3.15 ten speed is rated for 500 lbs. more GCVW. What I have now is fine with my rig weight at about 87% of GCWR. I'm thinking maybe I could go with the 3.15. What do you think?

The following users liked this post:
Manuellabour247 (11-03-2016)
Old 11-03-2016, 07:31 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
5.0GN tow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,162
Received 211 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

I really dont see a reason not to 3.55s. The extra grunt at the early stages of acceleration will be benificial, and the fuel economy gain with a 3.15 will be minimal overall. If you go up to a bigger trailer at some point you might need the 3.55.
Old 11-03-2016, 08:41 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
PerryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chico, Ca.
Posts: 4,574
Received 964 Likes on 742 Posts

Default

I'd want the 3.55's. With a .68 top gear it'll still be turning rather low rpm at freeway speeds. This 10 speed thing still escapes me. I think we ran out of need with the 6 speed.
Old 11-03-2016, 09:41 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
bubbabud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tonopah. AZ.
Posts: 3,380
Received 502 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

I agree about no need for 10 speeds especially when you combine it with broad torque curve of the ecoboost engine. It seems to me that you could be rowing around through 4 or 5 close ratio gears at any given speed and still be near peak torque of the engine. I think it is a lot of complexity for very little or no benefit.
Old 11-03-2016, 12:55 PM
  #5  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

I suspect it doesn't much matter as far as performance is concerned. My old 6-speed with 3.15 axle ratio will pull a 20k trailer with no problems across the Hill Country of central Texas. Well, no problems if you don't think 6 MPG is a problem. The only advantage I can see with a 3.55 or 3.73 ratio might be a bit better MPG when loaded heavy. If the engineers did a good job in calibrating (computer programming) the PCM (drivetrain computer), then the 3.5L EcoBoost will get the job done regardless of gear ratio, tranny ratio, or final drive ratio.
Old 11-03-2016, 02:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
mike243's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: E Tn
Posts: 318
Received 40 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

355 here also.better pulling with heavier loads without baving to squeeze on it as hard.also from a dead stop means alot on take off when loaded heavy. Both of my f150 have 355.my 68 had 383 or there about 8 mpg with a 302 on a good day.
Old 11-03-2016, 05:30 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
untraceable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 425
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I sure wish I had a 4.5 gear while towing with my '16 5.0. I think the 10 speed could be awesome. though the thing that would get me is its bad enough when you step on it and the truck has to shift from 6th to 3rd. now it could be 10th to 5th
Old 11-03-2016, 07:25 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
acadianbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,060
Received 159 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smokeywren
I suspect it doesn't much matter as far as performance is concerned. My old 6-speed with 3.15 axle ratio will pull a 20k trailer with no problems across the Hill Country of central Texas. Well, no problems if you don't think 6 MPG is a problem. The only advantage I can see with a 3.55 or 3.73 ratio might be a bit better MPG when loaded heavy. If the engineers did a good job in calibrating (computer programming) the PCM (drivetrain computer), then the 3.5L EcoBoost will get the job done regardless of gear ratio, tranny ratio, or final drive ratio.
What gear is the truck in when you are pulling this load? 3rd? Maybe 4th? If so, you effectively have a 3 or 4 speed transmission.
Old 11-03-2016, 08:42 PM
  #9  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acadianbob
What gear is the truck in when you are pulling this load? 3rd? Maybe 4th? If so, you effectively have a 3 or 4 speed transmission.

Usually 5th gear on the flats. 6th going down the hills and 4th going up the hills. I don't remember it ever downshifting to 3rd.


I didn't mean to imply that I often tow that heavy - that was a one-time trip of 350 miles one way. That was a tandem axle dually gooseneck equipment trailer loaded with my John Deere 310A backhoe I was delivering to a place near Blanco. GCW was 27,500 pounds per the CAT scale. I was amazed at the performance of that 3.5L EcoBoost engine on that trip.


I've towed an 8,000-pound 5er twice on that same route, with GCW of less than 15,000 pounds, also with no problems other than about 9 MPG on premium gasoline. But my normal trailer is a 5,000-pound TT or a 6,000-pound cargo trailer at about 9 to 10 MPG cruising at 65 MPH.


I'm a firm believer in letting the PCM (drivetrain computer) determine which gear to select, so I put it drive, turn on tow/haul mode and cruise at 62-to-65 MPH, regardless of the load.
Old 11-07-2016, 04:26 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
atwowheelguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 482
Received 129 Likes on 107 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 5.0GN tow
I really dont see a reason not to 3.55s. The extra grunt at the early stages of acceleration will be benificial, and the fuel economy gain with a 3.15 will be minimal overall. If you go up to a bigger trailer at some point you might need the 3.55.
I have a 3.55 now with the 6 speed. It handles the trailer well. The 3.15 with the 10 speed has the same 1st gear ratio as the 3.55 with the 6 speed. With the 3.15 10 speed, I would not be giving up any acceleration from what I have now. The argument with the '13 was that the 3.73 was better than the 3.55. The 3.55 has been fine with the 3.5EB. My camper towing miles are about 10% of my annual miles.

I can't now, and don't want to, go to a bigger trailer. It's at the rear GAWR limit now of the '13. Any additional payload capacity of a new truck will just be more cushion.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.