Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Whipple 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2015, 02:23 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
azmidget91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,656
Received 138 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Why are you so concerned about the "cold air intake"? That video is all I have...
Old 03-13-2015, 07:03 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
hi-rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

Jst want to see what it looks like is all
Old 03-13-2015, 08:27 PM
  #13  
Farm Truck Racing TX
iTrader: (1)
 
HawaiiKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 554
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azdriver
LOL, more like "Trucks gonna have NO traction !!!!"
True, guess I should have said truck is gonna be fuuuun lol
Old 03-13-2015, 08:29 PM
  #14  
Farm Truck Racing TX
iTrader: (1)
 
HawaiiKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 554
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azmidget91
Yep 521RWHP/456RWTRQ https://youtu.be/1TmEuYa_n4I
Great numbers! Interesting to see the torque be a little lower than I expected, very much like my Prochargers numbers. Not a bad thing, just a 5.0 thing I guess.

Any dyno sheet to show where the peaks are?
Old 03-13-2015, 10:02 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HawaiiKid
Great numbers! Interesting to see the torque be a little lower than I expected, very much like my Prochargers numbers. Not a bad thing, just a 5.0 thing I guess.

Any dyno sheet to show where the peaks are?
Agreed, those numbers are pretty weak for that blower, especially the torque.
Old 05-18-2015, 11:31 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
azmidget91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,656
Received 138 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Here you go [MENTION=54551]hi-rev[/MENTION] pics of the intake (still has prototype tube)

Name:  0517151210_zpswbb0lb7z.jpg
Views: 111
Size:  210.4 KB

Name:  0517151210a_zpsuwdb4jqp.jpg
Views: 120
Size:  209.4 KB

Name:  0517151210b_zpsayyfn0dq.jpg
Views: 119
Size:  221.9 KB

Name:  0517151211_zpsv6cw5zg9.jpg
Views: 108
Size:  165.6 KB

Name:  0517151211a_zps8nihucc9.jpg
Views: 115
Size:  159.7 KB

Name:  0517151211b_zpsakftet69.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  175.1 KB

Already went up another PSI to 11.5
Name:  IMG_20150517_124038_zpsewobj0u7.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  423.7 KB
Old 05-18-2015, 12:54 PM
  #17  
Farm Truck Racing TX
iTrader: (1)
 
HawaiiKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 554
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

More boost is always better!
Old 05-18-2015, 11:14 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HawaiiKid
More boost is always better!
Well, until you go boom lol.

11.5 psi should get you in the 700hp ballpark. If you go more then you should upgrade your oil pump or the gears will eventually break, especially if you rev the engine high.
Old 05-18-2015, 11:37 PM
  #19  
Farm Truck Racing TX
iTrader: (1)
 
HawaiiKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 554
Received 77 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
Well, until you go boom lol. 11.5 psi should get you in the 700hp ballpark. If you go more then you should upgrade your oil pump or the gears will eventually break, especially if you rev the engine high.
700 to the crank...maybe. Not talking crap, I love this truck (I built mine to be its STX twin on 22s) but 11ish pounds of boost is not going to make 700 to the wheels of any F150 with a Coyote, even with a Whip on top.

I see 500ish, maybe 525 to the wheels when its all said and done with his set up and thats if its a 93 tuned truck. Could be wrong but I just dont see much more being possible on our trucks without pushing the drivetrain beyond what itll take.


But please prove me wrong!!! Love seeing new products and trucks being built, esp when they are awesome white Supercrews haha
Old 05-19-2015, 01:03 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HawaiiKid
700 to the crank...maybe. Not talking crap, I love this truck (I built mine to be its STX twin on 22s) but 11ish pounds of boost is not going to make 700 to the wheels of any F150 with a Coyote, even with a Whip on top.

I see 500ish, maybe 525 to the wheels when its all said and done with his set up and thats if its a 93 tuned truck. Could be wrong but I just dont see much more being possible on our trucks without pushing the drivetrain beyond what itll take.


But please prove me wrong!!! Love seeing new products and trucks being built, esp when they are awesome white Supercrews haha
I was talking crank. I made 540rwhp on 8.5lbs boost, I'm at 10ish now. My best trap speed went from 112 to 117.

A guy that frequents the same car scene I do has a 14' mustang that made 680rwhp on less than 10lbs. I know he's not talking **** because I drove his car and went 10.2 @136 (only let me drive it twice), he since went 10.01@139 at a different track.

It's key to remember that boost is a measure of restriction, if we put the mustang intake cam in the truck engine boost would go down while whp would go up.

Last edited by mechanicboy; 05-19-2015 at 01:07 AM.


Quick Reply: Whipple 5.0



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.