for those of us with ecoboosts getting less than advertised mileage. - Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans



for those of us with ecoboosts getting less than advertised mileage.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2012, 12:53 AM   #1
Senior Member
5 Year Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 260
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default for those of us with ecoboosts getting less than advertised mileage.

Let's start recording some data.

For example.

I just had the engine monitor on both of my trucks. One is getting 16mpg, the other 18+.

I noticed that the one getting less mpg had a manifold pressure of about 6.5# absolute at cold idle while the one that gets more mpg has a manifold pressure of about 8# absolute at cold idle.


at sea level


There is also a very noticable performance difference between the two, even after loading the very same " stock" tune.


I'll take a more in depth look at the differences tomorrow. pressure when not running, intake temps, exact idle pressures, 0-60 times, hot idle pressures, whatever else I can think of.

try not to opine in this thread, lets see if we can't discover a trend to the trucks, maybe something as simple as a map sensor miscalibration.
goodburbon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to goodburbon For This Useful Post:
TuxBlackEB (06-24-2012)
Old 06-24-2012, 01:28 AM   #2
Girthy Member
5 Year Member
 
sllydderrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: De Winton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,853
Thanked 98 Times in 87 Posts
Default

Subscribed.

I hope this thread produces ripe fruit.

I have not done any measuring nor do I have the equipment to do so. All I have is the productivity screen and the torque app. So: I shall shut up and not talk now.
sllydderrr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sllydderrr For This Useful Post:
Mizzou2749 (09-09-2012)
Old 06-24-2012, 04:00 AM   #3
Super Member
5 Year Member
 
TuxBlackEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 183
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sllydderrr View Post
Subscribed.

I hope this thread produces ripe fruit.

I have not done any measuring nor do I have the equipment to do so. All I have is the productivity screen and the torque app. So: I shall shut up and not talk now.
X2
TuxBlackEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 07:30 AM   #4
Just Another Member
5 Year Member
 
Theocoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 1,439
Thanked 117 Times in 85 Posts
Default

I've subscribed, but after 23,500 miles, I'm averaging exactly what the sticker says I should average: 17 mpg.

I'd be glad to contribute any data that the Torque app can provide. What would you like to see?

Last edited by Theocoog; 06-24-2012 at 07:33 AM.
Theocoog is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 09:21 AM   #5
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 2,361
Thanked 277 Times in 193 Posts
Default

So is the one with less # at the manifold basically bringing in less intake air?
I'm curious about this because I still wonder if many experiencing poor mileage have intercoolers full of water.
MadocHandyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 10:08 AM   #6
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 3,599
Thanked 886 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Even though I'm not in this club, I think I could offer some suggestions.

Poor fuel economy could be caused by too much drag or poor engine efficiency. Consider first determining which one it is.

Too much drag could be caused by malfunctioning stability control, malfunctioning ABS, low tire pressure, etc... To test it, maintain a steady 75 mph. Release the throttle and start a stopwatch. Time it to see how long it takes to decelerate from 75 to, say, 55 mph. Compare this to others to see if there are significant differences.

Poor engine efficiency can be caused by lots of things. Reading data can be helpful, but I urge you to get a computer scanner, scangauge, or any number of smartphone aps to read engine data. Pick a speed for everyone to get data. Faster is better because it's very difficult to hold the throttle steady enough at lower speeds. So, again, maintain a steady 75 mph and record data like: manifold pressure, A/F ratio, rpm, TC status, fuel flow rate, and ignition timing. Cam timing, knock retard, and EGT would also be helpful, but I haven't been able to read this with my scangauge. This can tell you if the engine is under increased load (higher manifold pressure), if you're getting false knock (low ignition timing), or just identify differences between high-mpg trucks and low-mpg trucks that could point you in the right direction.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by engineermike; 06-24-2012 at 10:14 AM.
engineermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 11:44 AM   #7
Screw ITT
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: League City, Tx.
Posts: 37
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

How about crapy gas stations that put 89 in in all + tanks. I worked at one in the 80' that put unlead in the leaded tanks. Is their a portable breathalyzer for gas octaine. Pore gas could be the factor.
sku11ey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 11:53 AM   #8
Senior Member
5 Year Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 3,599
Thanked 886 Times in 504 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sku11ey View Post
How about crapy gas stations that put 89 in in all + tanks. I worked at one in the 80' that put unlead in the leaded tanks. Is their a portable breathalyzer for gas octaine. Pore gas could be the factor.
It's been discussed many times, but octane makes no difference in fuel mileage except a rare few specific cases. Ethanol content, however, makes a difference.

Even still, I don't think octane or Ethanol content is you guys' issue, unless you're getting ripped off and running more than 10%. Many folks running 87 E10 gasahol are still getting much better mileage. I just made a 2400 mile trip, running 87 octane gas with Ethanol (the crappiest stuff you can buy) for 1800 miles of it. My overall average for the trip was 23.7 mpg's loaded down. The pure gas (87) tank was over 24, but the Ethanol gas (87) was still 22+ mpgs.

I suppose it's possible some of the stations are diluting the gas down with more Ethanol. Ethanol is cheaper, so they will clear more profit. They do sell Ethanol meters you can analyze the gas with. I've heard of this being done and some stations were selling >10% Ethanol gas.

Last edited by engineermike; 06-24-2012 at 12:00 PM.
engineermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 12:26 PM   #9
Car Lover
 
Bills96TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flint, Texas
Posts: 166
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Is there a program for Fords like HPtuners? I haven't really got into the tuning side of fords so I don't know but with the GM's this program can be setup to monitor almost any engine function and log the readings as well. I would think it would be an amazing tool to figure out what is going on as you can see everything, save the data and then play back or export to Excel and look for gross irregularities.
Bills96TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2012, 12:51 PM   #10
Race Red '12 XLT SCrew EB
 
EBinMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MT
Posts: 742
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by engineermike View Post
It's been discussed many times, but octane makes no difference in fuel mileage except a rare few specific cases. Ethanol content, however, makes a difference.

Even still, I don't think octane or Ethanol content is you guys' issue, unless you're getting ripped off and running more than 10%. Many folks running 87 E10 gasahol are still getting much better mileage. I just made a 2400 mile trip, running 87 octane gas with Ethanol (the crappiest stuff you can buy) for 1800 miles of it. My overall average for the trip was 23.7 mpg's loaded down. The pure gas (87) tank was over 24, but the Ethanol gas (87) was still 22+ mpgs.

I suppose it's possible some of the stations are diluting the gas down with more Ethanol. Ethanol is cheaper, so they will clear more profit. They do sell Ethanol meters you can analyze the gas with. I've heard of this being done and some stations were selling >10% Ethanol gas.
California (maybe others) uses extra oxygenators on top of Ethanol in their fuel for pollution control further lowering mileage.

I have read that in some cases the e10 we buy in many cases can actually 15-20% ethanol.

I have noted as well that when I fill gas in North Dakota or Wyoming I have much lower fuel mileage. I attribute this to ethanol blend vs the Exxon station I frequent that I know that has 0 ethanol.

Montana is supposed to mark pumps that have ethanol, yet when I fuel at the Cenex station near my home that has no ethanol markings I get much lower MPG in all my vehicles. This is the one that boggles my mind.

One more thing I have noticed. Highway rpm. My 2011 with 3.31 gearing would do 20 at 70, 18.5 at 79. My 2012 with 3.73 will do 19 at 70, and 15.7 at 79. I think the dramatic drop can be attributed to the rpm at cruise rising above 2000.

Last edited by EBinMT; 06-24-2012 at 01:04 PM.
EBinMT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dirty air filter = 3+ mpg masitile 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 64 03-16-2016 08:36 AM
North Central: 2014 F-150 King Ranch 4x4 - Last of the steel F150s $45000 harvstr 2009 - 2014 Truck Sales 2 10-31-2015 01:04 AM
Should I buy? :) Shay Cat Kiddy Introductions 2 09-22-2015 02:07 PM
Platinum 5.0 oil color and level Takeda 2015 - Present Ford F150 17 09-05-2015 11:20 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Copyright 2006 - 2016 F150Forum.com