Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

There is a fix for the condensation build up in the intercooler!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2012, 05:50 PM
  #11  
NFG
Junior Member
 
NFG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So I wonder how Ford will reconcile this "fix" with special service message 22265 - "Reduced Engine Performance Due to Air Flow Restriction Across Charge Air Cooler".
NFG is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 05:51 PM
  #12  
MXD
Senior Member
 
MXD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 285
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maplelakeduckslayer
Doesn't make me tingle with excitement. Get it done and see what happens I guess
I can't blame you for your lack of excitement but at least it shows that ford recognizes its an issue and is working on it. I have to believe that after the first tsb was a total failure, they made sure this one was not before they released it.
MXD is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 05:54 PM
  #13  
MXD
Senior Member
 
MXD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 285
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NFG
So I wonder how Ford will reconcile this "fix" with special service message 22265 - "Reduced Engine Performance Due to Air Flow Restriction Across Charge Air Cooler".
Maybe that's the flash? I've heard these run way rich from the factory so maybe the flash is a slight tune to pull some fuel out to compensate? Just a guess on my part, I have no idea what the flash entales.
MXD is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 05:57 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
BucketMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,219
Received 387 Likes on 274 Posts

Default

Totally subscribing, this thread's gonna be awesome!
BucketMan is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:23 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
pprior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 469
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Too efficient or not efficient enough would seem to have a great bit of variance depending on where one lives, the type of driving and environmental conditions.

Putting an air deflector plate in colorado might be very different than in Las Vegas during the summer.

This seems to my uneducated brain like a very bad idea as a "fix."
pprior is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:27 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
oldguy1946's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 387
Received 116 Likes on 75 Posts

Default kind of ironic

I have an 11 FX4 EB and have never had any of the problems others have had but it sure seems more than a little strange that Ford didn't want anyone to put a lower grill on the EB because it would reduce air flow to the cooler and cause damage. They even said it would void the warranty. Now they need to restrict the cooler because it works to well. I guess this explains why the folks that put the lower grill on have not had any problems with it causing damage. My question is why don't all EBs have this problem if the cooler works too good on one it should work the same on all of them. I live in Kansas with high heat and high humidity so mine should have the same problem but doesn't.
oldguy1946 is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:30 PM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jakeman68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RaidersScrew
can you post the pic of "figure 1A" please
I copied and posted the whole thing. I can see it just fine. Is everyone having a problem seeing the picture?
Jakeman68 is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:35 PM
  #18  
Official Member: Vast RWC
 
gimmie11s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,223
Received 35 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Jakeman68 you are doing the community a huge service with your inside info and we appreciate that.


However, im just not convinced the problem these guys are having is because of grand intercooler efficiency...... what a crock.

ICs have been front mounted for decades and there has never been these issues. I think the "shudder, studder" problem is more fuel or spark related but i dont experience it at all so thats only an opinion.

Replacing the cat is a start but remember there is reason they are going bad... OVER fueling!!

Either way thanks for keeping everyone informed.

Last edited by gimmie11s; 06-07-2012 at 06:40 PM.
gimmie11s is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Lynn Fisher (06-13-2013)
Old 06-07-2012, 06:37 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jakeman68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: East Wenatchee, WA
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You are welcome guys. I figured I would share what info I have.

As far as this goes, I believe the programming and possible catalytic convertor plays more of a part in this than the shield would.
Jakeman68 is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 06:44 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
WH-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 239
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Subscribed!
WH-7 is offline  


Quick Reply: There is a fix for the condensation build up in the intercooler!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.