Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Quaker State 5W-20 QSUD Syn.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2011, 03:24 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
EdCaffreyMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Great Falls, Montana
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You're right. I'm sure oil has come a long ways, and I am certainly a believer in synthetic oils/lubes. I'm coming up on the first oil change for my new truck and have already purchased a case of Motorcraft full syn and a filters. I was pleased when I did that little test on some of the Motorcraft oil, and after cooling the bottom of the can was clean, and the oil appeared no different than when I started.

Try that little test with some of the modern synthetic oils....just for fun. It's surprising what you will find. I did it with Mobil 1 and Castrol full syn....boiled both for a couple of minutes, let them cool, and there was all kinds of "junk" at the bottom of the Castrol can. The Mobil 1 can's bottom was nice and clean. Just from that little experiment, I will never put Castrol oils in any of my vehicles.
Old 08-10-2011, 03:45 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BbqKingRanch
Shoot i just use the oil i use in my deep fryers after it get old. Never have a problem with it. Peanut works the best though.
I'm sure somebody has tried it before.
Old 08-10-2011, 04:24 PM
  #13  
Driver
 
blackknight87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,472
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EdCaffreyMS
You're right. I'm sure oil has come a long ways, and I am certainly a believer in synthetic oils/lubes. I'm coming up on the first oil change for my new truck and have already purchased a case of Motorcraft full syn and a filters. I was pleased when I did that little test on some of the Motorcraft oil, and after cooling the bottom of the can was clean, and the oil appeared no different than when I started.

Try that little test with some of the modern synthetic oils....just for fun. It's surprising what you will find. I did it with Mobil 1 and Castrol full syn....boiled both for a couple of minutes, let them cool, and there was all kinds of "junk" at the bottom of the Castrol can. The Mobil 1 can's bottom was nice and clean. Just from that little experiment, I will never put Castrol oils in any of my vehicles.
good to hear about the mobile 1. that is what i swear by.
Old 08-10-2011, 05:43 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
EdCaffreyMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Great Falls, Montana
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree with liking Mobil 1. I changed to it several years ago, and have had very good luck with it in all three of our vehicle (02 Toyota RAV4, 77 F150, and my previous Toyota pickup). For the new truck I'm gona go with Motorcraft full syn....at least until the warranty is up. I did that little test to the Motorcraft oil just to see how it compared to Mobil 1. The results looked good!
Old 08-10-2011, 09:21 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EdCaffreyMS
You're right. I'm sure oil has come a long ways, and I am certainly a believer in synthetic oils/lubes. I'm coming up on the first oil change for my new truck and have already purchased a case of Motorcraft full syn and a filters. I was pleased when I did that little test on some of the Motorcraft oil, and after cooling the bottom of the can was clean, and the oil appeared no different than when I started.

Try that little test with some of the modern synthetic oils....just for fun. It's surprising what you will find. I did it with Mobil 1 and Castrol full syn....boiled both for a couple of minutes, let them cool, and there was all kinds of "junk" at the bottom of the Castrol can. The Mobil 1 can's bottom was nice and clean. Just from that little experiment, I will never put Castrol oils in any of my vehicles.

Okay.........I just torched some Quaker State 5W-20 Syn..........not very exciting......just alot of smoke.....and awful smell....nothing else....no residue..nothing but stink and smoke......so does that mean QS is just as good as Mobil 1, because it pasted the fire test??????
Old 08-10-2011, 09:55 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blackknight87
good to hear about the mobile 1. that is what i swear by.
Per Mobile 1 spec sheet......flash point for Mobil 1 is 446 degree's.......QS 440..............pour point Mobil 1 is -43.........QS is -45......not alot of differance
Old 08-10-2011, 10:14 PM
  #17  
Devil's advocate
 
JP2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,797
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

QS UD is an excellent oil.

Myth:
Oils from paraffin-based crude are loaded with wax and create engine sludge, varnish and/or engine deposits.

Fact:
...Most conventional engine lubricating oils today are made from paraffinic crude oil. Virtually every oil company uses paraffinic base stocks in blending its conventional engine oil products. Many people believe the term paraffinic to be synonymous with wax. Some have the misconception that paraffinic oils will coat the engine with a wax film that can result in engine deposits. This is not true. The confusion exists because paraffinic molecules can form wax crystals at low temperatures...

http://www.quakerstate.com/#/car-care/myth-vs-fact

Last edited by JP2085; 08-10-2011 at 10:17 PM.
Old 08-10-2011, 10:21 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JP2085
QS UD is an excellent oil.

Myth:
Oils from paraffin-based crude are loaded with wax and create engine sludge, varnish and/or engine deposits.

Fact:
...Most conventional engine lubricating oils today are made from paraffinic crude oil. Virtually every oil company uses paraffinic base stocks in blending its conventional engine oil products. Many people believe the term paraffinic to be synonymous with wax. Some have the misconception that paraffinic oils will coat the engine with a wax film that can result in engine deposits. This is not true. The confusion exists because paraffinic molecules can form wax crystals at low temperatures...

http://www.quakerstate.com/#/car-care/myth-vs-fact
THANK YOU JP2085........Your right QS is a very good oil
Old 08-10-2011, 10:58 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
amascio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 5600’ in Arizona
Posts: 530
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

I believe Quaker State is now owned by Shell Oil Products US. Look at the bottle next time you're at the Walmart or the auto parts store - somewhere, in the fine print it will say SOPUS.

Shell also owns Pennzoil as well; Same thing, look for the SOPUS on the bottle.

Take the time to download the product data sheets from Mobil and Motorcraft. I recently did and compared the full synthetic 5w-30 oils and the MC has a higher flash point and lower pour point than the M1. The difference is marginal at best, but I had no problem switching from M1 to MC for my truck.

In my Mazdaspeed3 I ran Pennzoil Platinum 5w30 because it carries the HTO-06 Acura/Honda turbo rating (which isn't easy to meet) and because used oil analysis at bobistheoilguy showed it to hold well to fuel dilution, which is an issue with the MS3 engine. I ran that car for 60k miles and the PP never showed any stress from being in that engine, which is lovingly referred to as "the little volcano".

It is very easy to see into the valve train on the MS3 through the oil fill hole and the PP kept that engine spotless. I actually had someone tell me that I was ruining my engine with that "waxy" Pennzoil in my car, so I took the time to let him gaze into the valve cover; conversation stopped.
Old 08-10-2011, 11:08 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
TruckLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,268
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TFC1
speaking of Quaker state. that brings back memories. it was 1980 and I just got my drivers license,something I had been anxiously been awaiting for 16 years! I took my moms 74 Torino out for a drive(my parents very first brand new car purchase) an hour later i had it towed home with a blown motor. my dad decided we would rebuild it, so we started the tear down. everything in the motor was caked with sludge. I mean really thick sludge. my dad blamed the blown motor on the oil and not his 16 year old hot rod son. thank god! he never used Quaker state again and neither have I!
My grandfather had the same thing happen in the 70's on a Lincoln. He swore off Quaker state from that moment on.


Quick Reply: Quaker State 5W-20 QSUD Syn.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.