Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

New Member, EB bad gas mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2012, 06:32 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
brucesears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Western Oklahoma
Posts: 834
Received 130 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sluggo1
An average of 27mpg? Come on! No way
He lives in Maryland, when I was there this summer the speed limit everwhere I went was 55. Mine would probably get that mpg if I only drove 55-glad I don't have to.
Old 10-12-2012, 06:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
iFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Posts: 1,545
Received 162 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

New truck, city driving, 12 mpg is fine I think. It will improve some, but remember, city driving means 0 mpg quite often.
Old 10-12-2012, 07:30 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
dodgehemi0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 797
Received 147 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I call
Old 10-12-2012, 07:30 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
dodgehemi0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 797
Received 147 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I call BS.
Old 10-12-2012, 08:04 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
bignfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 224
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brucesears

He lives in Maryland, when I was there this summer the speed limit everwhere I went was 55. Mine would probably get that mpg if I only drove 55-glad I don't have to.
I normally avg 20-21 on the hwy but on my way home from florida I was in traffic on a 2 lane hwy stuck going about 55. I had just filled up with gas and reset the trip computer and it showed I was at 27.x mpg by the time I got to the interstate. ( about 45 miles). Lifetime avg is 17.5
Old 10-12-2012, 08:39 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dodgehemi0

I call BS.
I wouldn't say that. He did say average on the hwy. I've done 26 easy doing around 58 mph on rolling 2 lane hwy.
Drops off fast when you start passing people though ;-)
Old 10-12-2012, 08:39 PM
  #17  
Member
 
truckerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 329
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Mythbusters study MPG savings of various bed modifications
the Mythbusters examine the following modifications to a truck's bed to see how it affects the truck's MPG:
Tailgate up (control test)
Tailgate down
Hard top tonneau
Mesh tailgate
No tailgate



Here are the results:

WORST: Tailgate down
BEST: Mesh Tailgate (a little more than 5% savings)
All of the rest were relatively the same, and having installed a tonneau recently I can confirm the lack of an MPG boost.


MORAL: If you're buying a tonneau for the sole reason of improving your MPG you're wasting your money. It seems like there's a lot of MPG improvement myths when it comes to vehicles, but this one is especially bad because tonneau-cover MPG improvements seems so intrinsically plausible. The bed just seems like a massive wind catcher!

This also shows that you shouldn't trust any manufacturer's claim on MPG improvement. With the internet, it's trivially easy to verify their claims so spend 15 minutes before spending a few hundred dollars on snake oil. Perfect example for me is the Throttle Body spacer. They supposedly improve MPG, but a quick search on the web told me (for the types of engines in a Dakota) that this really is a big scam.

Oh, and always be skeptical of perfectly nice round numbers! Many tonneaus claim a nice, neat, and perfect 10% improvement. Yeah, right!
Old 10-12-2012, 09:12 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
reward69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 342
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I hope the 27 is a typo, if not put the crack pipe down!
Old 10-13-2012, 07:30 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Shorestyle031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thanks for the input, i'm going to wait it out and see what happens
Old 10-13-2012, 08:21 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
jknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I have 4500 miles on my truck. The life time mileage is 15.5 mpg. I don't see it getting any better. I'll be happy when I can get rid of this truck.
The following 2 users liked this post by jknight:
BlueFordF-150 (12-07-2012), Half_ton (10-14-2012)


Quick Reply: New Member, EB bad gas mpg



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:18 PM.