Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

New to Eco, What to do

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2012, 08:28 PM
  #21  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rgmiller32
They do sell more V-6 engines then V-8's. The local dealer near me sold more 3.5's then 5.0's. And on everything but screws sold more 3.7's then 5.0's.
Must be a very localized thing with the 3.7 s.
Old 10-15-2012, 08:44 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
crash_ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mont-Saint-Hilaire
Posts: 451
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default Change Mine to

I change my 2011 f-150 xtr whit 5.0 for FX4 whit luxury package Ecoboost.
My 5.0 take less gas then my Ecoboost but i love the power of ecoboost .
i put 5star tune 94 perf/tow inside and it s a beast.
If i would have to change another time for sure i will go whit th EB.
Old 10-15-2012, 09:07 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
cerhai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: northwest
Posts: 437
Received 50 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Fuel mileage is NOT the only reason to buy an Ecoboost.
true, I for one bought it for the towing power, summer hauling my 26 foot camper with 4wheeler in the bed and winter a snowmobile trailer, I was looking at half ton with a little bit more power than my 2004 5.3 silverado, it did fine towing but it was hard on it, I felt like I was raping the poor truck when towing my toys up and down the northwest mountains, so the ecoboost came out and I knew that was the way I had to go. There is no better feeling going up a incline with a big *** trailer doing 60 and the truck is barely over 3000 rpm and the turbos are just whistling.
Old 10-15-2012, 09:46 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 250
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sullyman
Name me a twin turbo charged gasoline engine that had historically proven reliability for over 200k miles?

Short list, isn't it.
Audi/VW has been building single and twin turbo engines for better than 20 years, and these cars easily go 300,000 plus if you maintain them. The 1.8t can be modded from 150 to 300 hp and still last 200,000 with no work to the bottom end.

Turbos don't necessarily put more strain on an engine; your presumption only applies if you are putting a blower or turbo on a vehicle that didn't come with it. A purpose-built turbocharged engine is designed specifically to handle the conditions created under boost.

IMHO, the American prejudice against turbocharged engines is due to cars like the Daytona Turbo, built by American auto makers in the 80's, which were just badly designed engines, and were horrible examples of boost technology. (The Daytona had an oil-cooled turbo, built with very small oil galleys, so the turbo overheated, and if you weren't religious about oil changes, the top end would blow up when the galleys got plugged. Hence the engines typically didn't last 50,000 miles.)

The technology has been around for decades, and is perfectly capable of lasting if it is built well.

Last edited by Rider; 10-15-2012 at 09:51 PM.
Old 02-13-2013, 02:39 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
oldest man ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 4
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Asking longevety?

900 miles on my 2012 3.5 eco. 4x4 screw Platinum. Love the truck . Wanting to hear from anyone that has hit 100000 with a 3.5 eco. 4x4 screw.
Old 02-13-2013, 05:00 PM
  #26  
Member
 
gregt909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 91
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by reward69
The 2.3 turbo was a cool little motor!
+1, I bypassed the wastegate on my 1980 and was making 12+ psi of boost. It didn't blow the head gasket till 150K miles or so. Not too bad in my book.

Last edited by gregt909; 02-13-2013 at 05:03 PM.
Old 02-13-2013, 05:15 PM
  #27  
Batteries Not Included
 
sgtpatiolantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 18,735
Received 294 Likes on 190 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tdowell65
I just recently sold my 11 5.0 for a 12 eco, with intent of using as a daily driver. I average aroung 40k miles a year. So I'm hoping this eco will hold up. Ive read thru lots of threads on here and after listening to everybody it should do 200k with issue.
My question is what can i do now to help insure that. Not sure I want to put a tune on it, but wonder if it would be helpful long term?

Any suggestions would be helpful. As far as MPG which was a factor for going to ecoboost. Its better than my 5.0 hwy 19 compared to 17.5 in town they seem to be about same. Pretty happy about that.

Thanks
I am a firm believer in maintenance and using a vehicle for what it was intended. I have never had a failure in my life. Except for my ex girlfriend Lorna. Again, maintenance issue. Now let's never talk of her again.....
Old 02-13-2013, 05:19 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
geno51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 3,150
Received 456 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldest man ever
900 miles on my 2012 3.5 eco. 4x4 screw Platinum. Love the truck . Wanting to hear from anyone that has hit 100000 with a 3.5 eco. 4x4 screw.
That would be a very limited number of owners I would assume as you would have to put more then 50,000 a year on a first run truck to hit that. I am sure there will be a few that hit 100,000 by the end of next year.

My truck will likely have 60k at that point
Old 02-16-2013, 11:22 PM
  #29  
Member
 
TonyB.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 94
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You've also got to remember that the forum is a place where a lot of people come to bitch and complain about poor mileage and a "55 mph shudder" so they can be part of the cool crowd. Enjoy your truck and don't worry about any issues until they present themselves. I've got an '11 EB FX4 and haven't had any of the problems that people here cry about. It's been a perfect truck and I tow a 5500lb trailer every weekend during the summer. Already plenty of power, no need for drivetrain mods.
Old 02-16-2013, 11:24 PM
  #30  
Member
 
TonyB.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 94
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rider
Audi/VW has been building single and twin turbo engines for better than 20 years, and these cars easily go 300,000 plus if you maintain them. The 1.8t can be modded from 150 to 300 hp and still last 200,000 with no work to the bottom end.

Turbos don't necessarily put more strain on an engine; your presumption only applies if you are putting a blower or turbo on a vehicle that didn't come with it. A purpose-built turbocharged engine is designed specifically to handle the conditions created under boost.

IMHO, the American prejudice against turbocharged engines is due to cars like the Daytona Turbo, built by American auto makers in the 80's, which were just badly designed engines, and were horrible examples of boost technology. (The Daytona had an oil-cooled turbo, built with very small oil galleys, so the turbo overheated, and if you weren't religious about oil changes, the top end would blow up when the galleys got plugged. Hence the engines typically didn't last 50,000 miles.)

The technology has been around for decades, and is perfectly capable of lasting if it is built well.
This. All this talk about "turbos wont live" blah blah blah is coming from the mouths of idiots.
The following 6 users liked this post by TonyB.:
EcoboostKev (02-17-2013), geno51 (02-16-2013), Jammer90 (05-25-2014), linkin_park_453 (02-16-2013), zach92r (02-17-2013), zitterich246 (02-17-2013) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)



Quick Reply: New to Eco, What to do



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.