Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2015, 09:56 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by isthatahemi
Still awaiting some substation of your claims. Pretty weak when you can't back up what you post, and instead come after me. Nice.
He's a child... I have a teenager - they all behave like this from time to time.
The following users liked this post:
isthatahemi (08-11-2015)
Old 08-14-2015, 11:58 AM
  #52  
Blackhawk CrewChief
 
blackhawk2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fort Rucker, AL
Posts: 263
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Ok I so I took a little trip to visit family last month and wanted to post some real world numbers. Now I'm sure everyone is gonna be different but here is mine. 2013 F150 Crew KR 4x4 5.0L with 3.73 gears now just over 30,000 miles, edge turner, true dual exhaust with the bak flip tri fold.

MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-image-2164904913.jpg

From central Texas to just outside Atlanta.



MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-image-1280200194.jpg

From Atlanta to upstate PA.



MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-image-222194429.jpg

From Atlanta back to central Texas. With the bak flip opened due to a hutch in the bed.

I forgot to take a picture of the fuel number from PA back to Atlanta.

I would say my avg speed was somewhere around 65-70 for most of trip.

I run royal purple oil in the truck and was in need of a oil change when I got back from the trip.

I feel like the truck pretty well overall. With the changes of elevation and highway speeds and traffic. We most our driving at night so I had lower air temps and less traffic.

I normally get 15-16 mpg for my around mileage here at home going to and from work 50/50 highway/city driving. I have no complaints.
Attached Thumbnails MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-image-2192572042.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
Manuellabour247 (08-14-2015)
Old 08-17-2015, 04:54 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
johndog82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: central CA, chevtard country
Posts: 1,785
Received 234 Likes on 194 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
He's a child... I have a teenager - they all behave like this from time to time.

Good to know I'm arguing with a couple of hypocrites who are in complete denial of reality.
If you consider statistics, your argument is delusional. You're claiming that the 3.7 is immune to anything on it going bad, ever, since day 1 of production. Given the well documented history of mass producing engines, the debugging updates manufacturers make along the way, the reality of a bearing going bad, the reality of an engine leaving the factory with a faulty internal part (uncommon but still happens), and the fact that they're made by humans and not androids, THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU to show that there isn't a SINGLE 3.7 on the planet that has EVER knocked/slapped/had any noise producing defect whatsoever. Not a single one out of how many thousands in how many years? Good luck with that. And you chumps have the gall to accuse me of BS'ing. Pull your head out. There is a MUCH greater chance that I can locate evidence that blows your pipe dream for the 3.7 out of the water. Intelligent people already accept this remedial knowledge but you two children would rather keep your heads buried in the sand. Statistically you're screwed and your argument relies on a hope and a prayer. ZX is sticking his fingers in his ears and going "LALALALA!" yet I'M the child. Haha okay. Keep telling yourselves that in order to delude yourselves into thinking youve won this argument.


Last edited by johndog82; 08-17-2015 at 09:08 PM.
Old 08-17-2015, 05:47 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
tsigwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 1,490
Received 272 Likes on 188 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by johndog82
good to know I'm arguing with a couple of bitter hypocrites who are complete denial of reality.
If you consider statistics and history, your argument is completely delusional. And you say I'M the child? If that's the case, that puts you two in diapers and strollers.
Given the well documented history of the mass produced internal combustion engine and the tolerances of the production equipment (which has gotten tighter but still isn't perfect), THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU to show that there isn't a SINGLE 3.7 on the planet that knocks. Not even one. You call me the child yet you're the ones so incredibly butthurt at the idea that there could be a dozen knocking 3.7's out of the tens (or hundreds?) of thousands that were produced. Again, the burden is on YOU to provide evidence that not one single 3.7 EVER produced has a knock/piston slap problem. Stop baselessly agruing with me and put up or shut up. I guarantee you you'll have to shut up because there is a MUCH MUCH greater chance that I can eventually locate evidence that blows your fairytale wishes for the 3.7 out of the water. Intelligent people already accept this remedial knowledge but you two chumps would clearly rather keep your heads buried deep in the sand. Statistically you're screwed. You are sticking your fingers in your ears and going "LALALALA!" yet I'M the child huh. Haha okay. Keep telling yourselves that in order to delude yourselves into thinking youve won this argument. You're pathetic. Come back when youve grown a brain cell.


Now that's a convincing argument.
Old 08-17-2015, 06:06 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
johndog82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: central CA, chevtard country
Posts: 1,785
Received 234 Likes on 194 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by isthatahemi
Still awaiting some substation of your claims. Pretty weak when you can't back up what you post, and instead come after me. Nice.
The burden of proof is on you genius, seeing that you're the one with the pipe dream that goes against hard stats and data. Let the butthurt flow.


Originally Posted by tsigwing
Now that's a convincing argument.
Theyre the ones making a claim thats more unsubstantiated than mine, so the burden of proof is on them. Instead of getting defensive they would need to do weeks of thorough research combing every ford service department in north america and prove there was never a single 3.7 f150 in existence that has ever had parts replaced (in and out of warranty) because of knocking/piston slap/pinging/tapping. No records showing anything done related to diagnosing or fixing a knock or abnormal tap. No records of bad bearings, cams, or followers that QC accidentally let through. Nothing at all. We're looking for a true 100% , not 99.9 clean record on the 3.7. and we're not even including the 3.7 Mustangs. I wouldn't be surprised if its around 99% because those duratecs have a very reliable reputation. But these clowns are trying to claim 100% immunity. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate you're not delusional, seeing that history and humans are not on your side.
We've got almost 5 years and maybe half a million (?) of those trucks to work with now and Beavis and Butthead over here really believe that ford pulled off a true 0.0% problem rate with that engine
We all know the 5L has a much more widespread problem with it. Not the point. The point is Zx12 and isthatahemi don't have a shred of evidence to back up their claim.

Now ZX12-Iowa will probably fall back on his usual calling me a "child" cop out and isthatahemi will continue searching his rectum for his brain. That's what people do when facts won't change their mind.

Last edited by johndog82; 08-20-2015 at 11:12 PM.
Old 08-23-2015, 01:49 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Manuellabour247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,059
Received 394 Likes on 361 Posts

Default MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8

Here's one i took the other night
Attached Thumbnails MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-20150821_005542.jpg  
Old 09-12-2015, 10:17 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
nrceptr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 458
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I just purchased my 2014 F150 SuperCrew XLT 5.0 4x4 two weeks ago with 4k miles on it. I drove it from Dallas to New Orleans and averaged 16 mpg with my cruise set at 80.

I just drove from New Orleans to central Louisiana to visit my family for the weekend. I drove the exact speed limit all the way and averaged 22.5 mpg. Needless to say I'm impressed with the truck compared to my 07 XLT 5.4 2wd. Both trucks have 3.55 gears.

Just my two cents.
Old 09-12-2015, 10:18 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
nrceptr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 458
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Here's a pic of the dash with the specifics
Attached Thumbnails MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8-forumrunner_20150912_211840.png  
Old 09-14-2015, 01:13 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
JLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 667
Received 83 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

Here's my dash picture:




If you keep it 60 or less, that will net you the best mileage.



Quick Reply: MPG - 3.7 V6 vs 5.0 V8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 PM.