Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Fx4 70-75 mph 5.0l mpg?

Old 06-01-2011, 12:10 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
sink17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 207
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Can't order those options? I have a red candy fx4 with the nav...
Old 06-01-2011, 02:00 AM
  #22  
Member
Thread Starter
 
fx4gxp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 80
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Not anymore

sink17... You can't order them anymore. I had an order in for one for about 6 weeks and it was canceled a couple of weeks ago. I was told they can no longer make the Red Candy Metallic Color because it comes from Japan. I was also told there is a shortage of the Nav units also due to Japan. My dealer mentioned that Red Candy is unavailable for the rest of this model year. Not sure if the color will be replaced next year? I was also told that Navigation units were unavailable for the remainder of this year and for next year as well. Not sure if its true, but that is the reason Ford gave for canceling my order.

So if I wanted one, I had to pick from what was left. And in the combination, there are very few left. The closest one to me was about 900 miles away, so that is what I went with.
Old 06-06-2011, 04:04 PM
  #23  
Better OUT then IN
 
justjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes on 206 Posts

Default

Just took another long trip - no hurry.

Speed was 64-65mpg (TOPS) and I consistently got 22.5 mpg.

Also, seems I get better mileage WITHOUT cruise control. I just let the truck slow a little when going over hills where the cruise will obviously try to keep the speed.

My thoughts
Old 06-06-2011, 04:17 PM
  #24  
Driver
 
blackknight87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,472
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by justjimmy
Just took another long trip - no hurry.

Speed was 64-65mpg (TOPS) and I consistently got 22.5 mpg.

Also, seems I get better mileage WITHOUT cruise control. I just let the truck slow a little when going over hills where the cruise will obviously try to keep the speed.

My thoughts
nice numbers man.
Old 06-06-2011, 05:37 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
swiffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 702
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by justjimmy
Just took another long trip - no hurry.

Speed was 64-65mpg (TOPS) and I consistently got 22.5 mpg.

Also, seems I get better mileage WITHOUT cruise control. I just let the truck slow a little when going over hills where the cruise will obviously try to keep the speed.

My thoughts
I am consistently seeing 2wd 5.0's get 20.0+ mpg on the highway, but I don't think I've read where the 4wd's are getting those numbers. Obviously 4wd will be slightly less fuel efficient, but I figured it would still get 20+mpg on the highway...

Thanks for the numbers Jimmy
Old 06-06-2011, 09:33 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by swiffer
I am consistently seeing 2wd 5.0's get 20.0+ mpg on the highway, but I don't think I've read where the 4wd's are getting those numbers. Obviously 4wd will be slightly less fuel efficient, but I figured it would still get 20+mpg on the highway...

Thanks for the numbers Jimmy
You guys have better self control than I..........I love to heard that 5.0 sing......best sounding V-8 Ford ever put in a truck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 06-07-2011, 12:00 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
bamastang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Remember even if your getting the same mileage as the EB w/ the 5.0 you still have more torque with the EB and you have it at a much lower RPM. So they may be close to the same mpg's but thats with the Eb suppling more torque and when your spending 40,000 what 750.
Old 06-07-2011, 09:35 PM
  #28  
Better OUT then IN
 
justjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes on 206 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bamastang
Remember even if your getting the same mileage as the EB w/ the 5.0 you still have more torque with the EB and you have it at a much lower RPM. So they may be close to the same mpg's but thats with the Eb suppling more torque and when your spending 40,000 what 750.
Let's not make this another battle between the two engines.

I was just showing my numbers.

My bud has an EB and it most certainly rocks.

From the famous words of Rodney King... "Can't we just all get along?"

5.0 L's are awesome and the EB's are awesome too. Oh yea, let's not forget the 6.2 L's too.
Old 06-07-2011, 09:43 PM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
msfiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yea I drove a 5.0 and then bought a EB. But the sound of the 5.0 was sweet.
Old 01-26-2012, 07:10 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
colemac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 467
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

So I just bought a 2012 Fx4 Supercrew 5.0 with 3.73 gears. I am in Canada so what does this equate to for km's per tank on average you are getting with city and highway driving or whatever conditions you have.

Thanks in advance,

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Fx4 70-75 mph 5.0l mpg?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.