Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.
View Poll Results: Which one would you get?
5.0 360HP/380Lbs
33.77%
3.5 365HP/420Lbs
66.23%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Which engine 5.0 or 3.5 EB would you recommend?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2011, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
a_guerrajr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you fellas for the input.

EB seems to be on top.

However I do like to mod, even if it's just CAI/Tune/Exhaust.

Another concern down the road is, I assume the Eco Boost will be more expensive to repair????
Old 06-27-2011, 01:53 PM
  #12  
I Like Tires
 
BassAckwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,828
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by a_guerrajr
Thank you fellas for the input.

EB seems to be on top.

However I do like to mod, even if it's just CAI/Tune/Exhaust.

Another concern down the road is, I assume the Eco Boost will be more expensive to repair????
That is probably quite likely but it's hard to say at this point as nobody has been able to tell us from experience how much things like turbos and injectors will cost to replace on these motors.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:05 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Bgoptmst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Camp Pendleton, California
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike

Though no facts are available on this yet, my opinion is exactly the opposite of yours.

I'm not sure how you're making this conclusion. 1 or 2 guys are complaining about poor mileage, likely due to some defect. Most others are doing well. My last tank was over 21 mpg, whereas my last three 1/2 ton trucks were in the 12-17 range.
There are facts available on this. 5 start tunes has tuners for the 5.0.

http://www.5startuning.com/2011-f150-5L/

As a side note it has been about a month and I am anxiously waiting for the the people you called to offer the EB tunes and programs.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:06 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
02themax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 543
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
For the use of the truck that the OP describes, I think that the 5.0 would be the perfect engine for you.
If you do tow a lot, the torque peak on the 5.0 is WAAAAAAAAAAAAY up there in the middle 4k's RPM's. The torque curve on the EB comes on in the high teens and stays flat virtually all the way to redline. One of the reasons I still like my 5.4 is that the torque peak may be 20 ft/lbs lower than the 5.0, but it also gets there at "only" 3,500 RPM. When we are pulling 8,400 pounds up a 6% grade in to a 40 MPH headwind, I just stick it on 3,500 RPM and GET 'ER DONE.....
And yes, I'll bet that Ford is VERY concerned about folks modding the EB. Its already a highly optimized and highly stressed little engine, with peak boost of 12 psi and a temporary overrun to 16. That folks, is a LOT of boost for a "stock" engine.......does anyone know if the EB has forged internals? It must to sustain that kind of boost while towing 11,300 pounds!
Hmm even though I picked the 5.0 I think the eco would be better for the OP. If he was towing more then I'd choose the 5.0. The eco gets worse mpg than the 5.0 when towing even though it can tow more it'll be under a lot of stress and heat. If he was towing a lot then I'd say 6.2.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:43 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Though no facts are available on this yet, my opinion is exactly the opposite of yours.



I'm not sure how you're making this conclusion. 1 or 2 guys are complaining about poor mileage, likely due to some defect. Most others are doing well. My last tank was over 21 mpg, whereas my last three 1/2 ton trucks were in the 12-17 range.
{deleted crap that I should never have put here in the first place}

mr mike, from what I've read, I certainly wouldnt classify it as 'most others' doing 'well' (unless 'well' is defined as <1 mpg better than the 5.0) or as '1 or 2 guys complaining about poor mileage' not to mention the pure speculation about defects. pot meet kettle on speculation and 'uncited' 'facts'.

Last edited by 11screw50; 06-27-2011 at 03:28 PM.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:51 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Georgiaboy5.0L's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 574
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ford_honda
5.0. more aftermarket stuff will be available and people arent really getting that good of mileage with the EB.

cant beat the sound either.

can always get a SC kit for the 5.0 and eat the EB up
I bought the 5.0.......love the engine..............I would love for someone that knows to tell me why Ford offers 2 v-6 engines for the f-150.......looks like to me why not just put turbos on the 3.7 and drop the 3.5 to cut cost of producing 2 engines that are basically the same.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:56 PM
  #17  
Member
 
lthrnk75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My FX4 Scab eco averages 20 combined city hwy...has 4400 miles on it now. Had a best of 22 hwy so far. Perfectly happy with that. Definitely way better than my 02 FX 5.4 w/ 3.55 gears which was lucky to get 16 hwy
Old 06-27-2011, 03:01 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
a_guerrajr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my wife doesn't want me to get a v8, because of the gas cost.
So i was like EB is another option, but i'm not seeing that much of a difference.
So in the end she'll expect better from the 6 and i dont want to be like i told ya so.

i would image after break in the MPg goes up and using 93 octane with mild driving.
Old 06-27-2011, 03:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bgoptmst
There are facts available on this. 5 start tunes has tuners for the 5.0.

http://www.5startuning.com/2011-f150-5L/
Mr. ford_honda stated that more mods "will be" available for the 5.0. This is not fact and there are no facts, just speculation, on what the distant future holds.

Presently, you can get an exhaust, tuner, and CAI for the 5.0. Presently, you can get an exhaust, boost controllers, and high flow air filters for the EB.

Speculation is that people will figure out what Mustang 5.0 engine parts can be installed in the truck. Speculation (and some information from vendors) is that tuners, piping upgrades, bigger turbo's, Methanol kits, intercoolers, etc, etc, etc, will be available for the EB. Having some years experience with turbochargers makes me see a world of possiblities on this engine. Not to mention, the EB might benefit from some parts off the 3.7 NA truck motor.

Originally Posted by Bgoptmst
As a side note it has been about a month and I am anxiously waiting for the the people you called to offer the EB tunes and programs.
Coincidentally, I did some calling last week and was told there will be something released in about a week and a half. Again, do your own calling around and see what turns up. Are you really betting on no one being able to crack the ECM and offer tunes for the EB?
Old 06-27-2011, 03:04 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
AreL11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 616
Received 126 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I have an EB but only because it was the only black FX4 I could find within 100 miles that was optioned the way I wanted. I would have been fine if it were the 5.0, too.


Quick Reply: Which engine 5.0 or 3.5 EB would you recommend?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.