Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

EcoBoost runs 12.997@103.23 TUNE ONLY

Old 10-22-2014, 08:41 PM
  #81  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath

You CIA?
He's FBI.

Forum
Bulls#1t
Inspector.
The following 2 users liked this post by my67falcon:
dewserb (10-22-2014), ymeski56 (10-22-2014)
Old 10-22-2014, 08:41 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
 
NGA PLZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 134
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Run invalid. Missing tailgate shaved the .003.
The following 3 users liked this post by NGA PLZ:
2mnyprojects (10-22-2014), brucesears (10-23-2014), jayandsam09 (10-22-2014)
Old 10-22-2014, 08:47 PM
  #83  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,926 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kittrell87
Nice, just out of curiosity, have you tried shifting back out of 4hi after launching? Some guys in another thread said that only certain package trucks will do it. My 2012 fx4 will not but my buddy has a 2013 fx4 and swears his will.
I tried in my '11 FX4. It wouldn't disengage 4x4 until I let off the throttle at the end of the track.
Old 10-22-2014, 09:37 PM
  #84  
Senior Member

 
jwanck11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,204
Received 325 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

... Last couple of pages of the EB track times thread - Chad and Bruce have a hypothesis on the trucks that will shift out of 4X4 under load.

Frank, are you saying you ran 4X4 the entire 1/4? I recall reading that in 2wd, trucks pick up ~2-3mph.

I am curious what makes your truck so much quicker. It will be great to see another tune only reproduce sub 13s.

Falcon, you moderate without emotion? I disagree.
The following 2 users liked this post by jwanck11:
brucesears (10-23-2014), cirt063 (10-24-2014)
Old 10-22-2014, 10:57 PM
  #85  
Member
 
2mnyprojects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 42
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Yes 4x4 the whole time. Like i said before, this isn't a 12 second tune. It's a 13.3 tune run very well. Look at the slip, there's a lot of factors that go into that run. That day was the first time I hit 103 mph, then 8 knew I could get a 12, but I knew it would be close. 12.997@103.23. Ran that, then went home.
Old 10-23-2014, 02:33 AM
  #86  
Senior Member

 
ymeski56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach Calimexifornia
Posts: 58,557
Received 1,162 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jwanck11

Falcon, you moderate without emotion? I disagree.
If your intention is to derail this thread by calling out a moderator on the open forum, rather than discussing it w/ him privately via personal messaging, you are well on your way.
The following 2 users liked this post by ymeski56:
bobkyle2 (10-23-2014), joedotmac (10-24-2014)
Old 10-23-2014, 07:55 AM
  #87  
Senior Member

 
jwanck11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,204
Received 325 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2mnyprojects
Yes 4x4 the whole time. Like i said before, this isn't a 12 second tune. It's a 13.3 tune run very well. Look at the slip, there's a lot of factors that go into that run. That day was the first time I hit 103 mph, then 8 knew I could get a 12, but I knew it would be close. 12.997@103.23. Ran that, then went home.
gotcha - though I wonder if you were able to flip to 2wd if your truck would run 12s or very close to 12s regularly. Tune only you hit numbers that I have not see many people reproduce. Engines and trucks have enough variability off the assembly line and with mods where some are clearly faster than others. Seems to me that you got a fast one and with a great tune, reached what has been sought for quite a long time - sub 12 seconds....

Originally Posted by ymeski56
If your intention is to derail this thread by calling out a moderator on the open forum, rather than discussing it w/ him privately via personal messaging, you are well on your way.
My hope Mike is to have the thread moderated in a completely unemotional manner. The intention is part of a more holistic and longer standing purpose to bring an end to tuner wars... which through the adjusted efforts of the community, largely has occurred. The cadence, volume and level of participation perpetuating the back and forth have all abated substantially.

This is a thread about an excellent run and badass tune that did not need your interjection either. The point is to expose dirty laundry in public - look at it for exactly what it is. In private, an adjustment would never had occurred.
The following users liked this post:
cirt063 (10-24-2014)
Old 10-23-2014, 09:15 AM
  #88  
Senior Member

 
dodgehemi0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 797
Received 147 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dewserb
Wow. I'm curious. Does Shawn tell you guys publicly to go forth and serve up the SSI koolaid, or does he do it on the down-low? It's no secret that he skirts the site sponsorship fees a number of ways (PMs, having his minions spread the word on forums, etc). However, I felt sure most, if not all, of the f150 sites had caught on to the shenanigans by now. Mods, yes. This is absolutely advertising. A similar thread was posted on f150online a day or so ago, and that thread is now gone. Here's how the SSI faithful operate: Then, they (including and especially Shawn) all gather on their forum to talk about how "f*&^ing stupid" the other forums and their members are. If the mods/admin want to see, I have proof of that, too. my67falcon, you had to have some sort of "feeling" that, given the context and content of this thread and the history of how SSI "goes to market" (Hard to type that with a straight face), that this was probably advertising. Otherwise, you wouldn't have issued the warning. IMHO, this behavior from a business owner is deplorable. It's unfair to the paying site sponsors, and it's just bad business.
People are your best advertisers this forum is meant for information which is what these guys are doing on here giving us information nothing wrong with that.
The following 6 users liked this post by dodgehemi0:
2mnyprojects (10-23-2014), brucesears (10-23-2014), cirt063 (10-24-2014), jayandsam09 (10-23-2014), jwanck11 (10-25-2014), Koolponycar (10-23-2014) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 10-23-2014, 09:18 AM
  #89  
Member
 
2mnyprojects's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 42
Received 25 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I'm certain I could run consistent 12's but if I make one error in launching, there goes the run.
The following 2 users liked this post by 2mnyprojects:
brucesears (10-23-2014), Koolponycar (10-23-2014)
Old 10-23-2014, 09:31 AM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
Koolponycar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South
Posts: 1,519
Received 159 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by my67falcon
So what is the fastest 5.0 with an SSI tune?
I don't know if any have run theirs, as I have just got my 87 and 93 tunes where I want them. I know one who is wanting to take his to the track but did just trade for a new stx 5.0 and is currently working in on breaking the truck in and has a mild tune for now. His plan is to get a more ***** to the walls 93 tune after break in. Then try a track run. I have never been to a track so i do not know what is the best way to launch my fx2 5.0. His truck is a 4wd. Some say to leave traction control on and others say not too. My truck has a less aggressive tip in as that is what I want for a DD. I don't really want to run my truck at the track, but might make a few runs just for s"s and Giggles. I know my truck whether 87 or 93 when you mash the gas you will end up backing out as it climbs so fast it would be unsafe to keep your foot in it. My tuck when I return it to stock now feels like a slug compared to the SSI tunes. Just to be clear I have only run SSI tunes and am 100% satisfied because I can get any kind tune tailored to my liking. My tunes are set up for stock like smooth shifting and good mpg when normal driving. And runs like a bastard cat when you mash the gas! And that is about my 5.0 SSI tune as I would be curoius too who has the fastest, but I am not willing to tare up my truck to find out, because if you don't know how to take off properly you will tare or break stuff with the power these tunes are making. One of the SSI EB guys twisted his drive shaft into 2 pieces trying. So it would be interesting to know what a SSI 5.0 with a ***** to the walls tune would run. And I hope the mods understand my post is about the question asked. There are more EB SSI trucks than 5.0 guys and that may just be because their are more EB sales too and turbos are going to make more power than a N/A truck for the most part.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: EcoBoost runs 12.997@103.23 TUNE ONLY



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.