Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost quarter mile times and mod's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2015, 12:53 PM
  #1281  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mark Miller
I put the MBRP 3" Cat Back on my truck as the only modification.Last year i ran a 14.88,14.92 and a 14.74 all bone stock.After the Cat Back this past Saturday 4/25/15 14.75,14.82 and a 14.76.When i ran the 14.74 last year i'm pretty sure i had less fuel in the tank then this last Saturday.It was more consistent with the Cat Back fluke or not what do you guys think?
Fluke. Independent testing of cat-backs show about 6rwhp or less. A downpipe is worth far more as far as bolt ons go.
Old 05-04-2015, 04:16 PM
  #1282  
Member
 
slow91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 2014 EcoBoost Tremor

LET 58mm turbos / LET tune / custom intercooler & exhaust / meth / magnaflow high-flow cats / factory down pipes

Run was made on my 22" Forgeline 3-pc wheels with Toyo Proxes

12.78 @ 109.48 (off-idle hit)
Old 05-12-2015, 12:41 AM
  #1283  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow91
LET 58mm turbos / LET tune / custom intercooler & exhaust / meth / magnaflow high-flow cats / factory down pipes

Run was made on my 22" Forgeline 3-pc wheels with Toyo Proxes

12.78 @ 109.48 (off-idle hit)
2wd? What was your 60'?

You need to reformat your listing to look like the others.
Old 05-14-2015, 12:05 PM
  #1284  
Senior Member
 
NickPic83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Rockland County NY
Posts: 476
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
2wd? What was your 60'?

You need to reformat your listing to look like the others.
now imagine that setup on a lighter 2015, he is last gen
Old 05-15-2015, 12:39 AM
  #1285  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NickPic83
now imagine that setup on a lighter 2015, he is last gen
That's what makes me want to get a 15' for, I'd be doing 11.0 1/4 mile. But let's keep this on topic.

His MPH suggests he should be able to do better than that if he can improve his 60', that's why I'm thinking he's 2wd.
Old 05-15-2015, 01:05 AM
  #1286  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
That's what makes me want to get a 15' for, I'd be doing 11.0 1/4 mile. But let's keep this on topic.

His MPH suggests he should be able to do better than that if he can improve his 60', that's why I'm thinking he's 2wd.
Slow is 2wd, he has some DR's in the works. So we should see some good times here shortly.
Old 05-15-2015, 04:39 PM
  #1287  
Senior Member
 
TurboPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 269
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
That's what makes me want to get a 15' for, I'd be doing 11.0 1/4 mile. But let's keep this on topic.

His MPH suggests he should be able to do better than that if he can improve his 60', that's why I'm thinking he's 2wd.

To run in the 11.99s with our trucks and a decent 1.7x 60ft you need more MPH then 109. More like 114 to 115 unless you 60ft in the 1.5xs which I dont think they will ever do that .


Pete
Old 05-15-2015, 11:08 PM
  #1288  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TurboPete
To run in the 11.99s with our trucks and a decent 1.7x 60ft you need more MPH then 109. More like 114 to 115 unless you 60ft in the 1.5xs which I dont think they will ever do that .


Pete
I didn't say he would run 11s, but my very first run in my truck was 12.5 @109 with a 1.9 60'. He should be able to do better than that with better tires.
Old 05-16-2015, 06:59 PM
  #1289  
Senior Member
 
TurboPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 269
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mechanicboy
I didn't say he would run 11s, but my very first run in my truck was 12.5 @109 with a 1.9 60'. He should be able to do better than that with better tires.
I quoted you.

All I was saying is that 109.mph is not fast enough for 11.99 to get into the 11.s with our trucks .

Even with your 12.5x pass and 1.9 60ft . With no additional mph you would need to 60ft in the 1.67 range and that will never happen with our 5500 pound trucks and 500 plus hp. It won't do it.
Now maybe a 15 with 700 pounds less could be done even with a 1.8 60ft because it should pick up at least 3 to 4 mph being lighter.
Old 05-17-2015, 03:12 AM
  #1290  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TurboPete
I quoted you.

All I was saying is that 109.mph is not fast enough for 11.99 to get into the 11.s with our trucks .

Even with your 12.5x pass and 1.9 60ft . With no additional mph you would need to 60ft in the 1.67 range and that will never happen with our 5500 pound trucks and 500 plus hp. It won't do it.
Now maybe a 15 with 700 pounds less could be done even with a 1.8 60ft because it should pick up at least 3 to 4 mph being lighter.
I see the confusion. You think my second paragraph was referencing the 1st which was referring doing 11s. The first paragraph was referring to my truck but having the weight loss of the 2015, the second paragraph was referring to the OP and his less than steller trap speed to 1/4 time in which I inferred that he must have had a slow 60' due to being 2wd (compared to what most 4wd will cut.

Two additional points I'd like to make; one, my 4wd screw has a 5390lbs race weight with me in it, two, I've cut a 1.72 60' in my truck with 1.78-1.82 being a normal 60' for me, and that was without traction bars. With Cal-Tracs my 60' didn't improve, I just spin more instead of wheel hop.


Quick Reply: Ecoboost quarter mile times and mod's



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.