Ecoboost Knock Sensors
#1
Ecoboost Knock Sensors
Hoping someone out there has good experience datalogging with SCT...
PID for knock sensor is labeled "knock sensor retard" and displays in degrees.
Common sense would say a negative value means knock was detected and the sensor wants to pull that much timing out, positive value means the sensor tells the truck 'hey, I can take more timing please and perform better'.
I actually called SCT and that's even what THEY told me. I, however can't accept that.
I think it's exactly reversed. A positive value shown when logging knock sensor activity indicates a knock event and that value is how much the sensor/computer want to retard the timing to avoid continued knock/detonation.
I validate this because every tune I log shows the knock sensor going to a positive value (let's say 3* to 4*) and the timing (spark advance) is simultaneously decreased. So it seems that when the knock sensor log is displaying a positive value it's actually telling the truck to pull timing.
Anyone confirm this or tell me I'm a retard? Either works!
PID for knock sensor is labeled "knock sensor retard" and displays in degrees.
Common sense would say a negative value means knock was detected and the sensor wants to pull that much timing out, positive value means the sensor tells the truck 'hey, I can take more timing please and perform better'.
I actually called SCT and that's even what THEY told me. I, however can't accept that.
I think it's exactly reversed. A positive value shown when logging knock sensor activity indicates a knock event and that value is how much the sensor/computer want to retard the timing to avoid continued knock/detonation.
I validate this because every tune I log shows the knock sensor going to a positive value (let's say 3* to 4*) and the timing (spark advance) is simultaneously decreased. So it seems that when the knock sensor log is displaying a positive value it's actually telling the truck to pull timing.
Anyone confirm this or tell me I'm a retard? Either works!
#2
Senior Member
Hoping someone out there has good experience datalogging with SCT...
PID for knock sensor is labeled "knock sensor retard" and displays in degrees.
Common sense would say a negative value means knock was detected and the sensor wants to pull that much timing out, positive value means the sensor tells the truck 'hey, I can take more timing please and perform better'.
I actually called SCT and that's even what THEY told me. I, however can't accept that.
I think it's exactly reversed. A positive value shown when logging knock sensor activity indicates a knock event and that value is how much the sensor/computer want to retard the timing to avoid continued knock/detonation.
I validate this because every tune I log shows the knock sensor going to a positive value (let's say 3* to 4*) and the timing (spark advance) is simultaneously decreased. So it seems that when the knock sensor log is displaying a positive value it's actually telling the truck to pull timing.
Anyone confirm this or tell me I'm a retard? Either works!
PID for knock sensor is labeled "knock sensor retard" and displays in degrees.
Common sense would say a negative value means knock was detected and the sensor wants to pull that much timing out, positive value means the sensor tells the truck 'hey, I can take more timing please and perform better'.
I actually called SCT and that's even what THEY told me. I, however can't accept that.
I think it's exactly reversed. A positive value shown when logging knock sensor activity indicates a knock event and that value is how much the sensor/computer want to retard the timing to avoid continued knock/detonation.
I validate this because every tune I log shows the knock sensor going to a positive value (let's say 3* to 4*) and the timing (spark advance) is simultaneously decreased. So it seems that when the knock sensor log is displaying a positive value it's actually telling the truck to pull timing.
Anyone confirm this or tell me I'm a retard? Either works!
Hope that helps
#3
Thanks, had a feeling you'd be chiming in pretty quick
What this does mean is I've got a f'n problem! I have not run a single person's 93 performance tune that doesn't knock like a ****.
I guess the only common denominator is where I always get gas. I'm gonna run the tank all the way down on stock tune, put in 10 gal of race gas and see if that sensor stays at zero or less.
What this does mean is I've got a f'n problem! I have not run a single person's 93 performance tune that doesn't knock like a ****.
I guess the only common denominator is where I always get gas. I'm gonna run the tank all the way down on stock tune, put in 10 gal of race gas and see if that sensor stays at zero or less.
#4
Senior Member
Thanks, had a feeling you'd be chiming in pretty quick
What this does mean is I've got a f'n problem! I have not run a single person's 93 performance tune that doesn't knock like a ****.
I guess the only common denominator is where I always get gas. I'm gonna run the tank all the way down on stock tune, put in 10 gal of race gas and see if that sensor stays at zero or less.
What this does mean is I've got a f'n problem! I have not run a single person's 93 performance tune that doesn't knock like a ****.
I guess the only common denominator is where I always get gas. I'm gonna run the tank all the way down on stock tune, put in 10 gal of race gas and see if that sensor stays at zero or less.
Last edited by geno51; 04-02-2013 at 06:30 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Great thread! I really wish my scan gauge would read knock retard. I've even tried programming in x gauges and no luck.
Will one of you so me a huge favor??? Settle the debate by putting 87 in the tank, drive around at part throttle, and tell me if its pulling timing during cruise and mild acceleration.
Will one of you so me a huge favor??? Settle the debate by putting 87 in the tank, drive around at part throttle, and tell me if its pulling timing during cruise and mild acceleration.
#6
Senior Member
I was talking to miller on the phone hes got some bigger issues he sent me a video his truck is knocking like nothing I have ever seen
As for me I know for a fact mine is only knocking under the most extreme loads and cases and its only pulling a little timing nothing like Miller is seeing
Geoffs tunner has got me dialed in! Just so you guys know there is some real cool stuff coming with their tuning like no one else has done yet
As for me I know for a fact mine is only knocking under the most extreme loads and cases and its only pulling a little timing nothing like Miller is seeing
Geoffs tunner has got me dialed in! Just so you guys know there is some real cool stuff coming with their tuning like no one else has done yet
#7
Geno - Funny thing is, when I look at the log of that video the knock sensor PID only reads a max of 3.5*, and that noise is still being made.
Looking at logs of ALL the tunes I have, they ALL have positive knock sensor values during a 3rd gear WOT pull on the street, ranging from 3.5* all the way to 10*.
Last car I logged and tuned was a turbo mustang, and if knock sensors pulled anything over 1* I was concerned. So seeing this much on this truck concerns me.
Looking at logs of ALL the tunes I have, they ALL have positive knock sensor values during a 3rd gear WOT pull on the street, ranging from 3.5* all the way to 10*.
Last car I logged and tuned was a turbo mustang, and if knock sensors pulled anything over 1* I was concerned. So seeing this much on this truck concerns me.
Trending Topics
#10
Senior Member
Miller I really think its the wastegates from our talks But regardless I know that they will get you dialed in
My official guess is a bad waistgate actuator causing what you showed me in that text its fine under normal boost but that tune is just to much for it causing it to flutter.. Thats my guess and I want a cookie if I am right
My official guess is a bad waistgate actuator causing what you showed me in that text its fine under normal boost but that tune is just to much for it causing it to flutter.. Thats my guess and I want a cookie if I am right
Last edited by geno51; 04-03-2013 at 12:33 PM.