Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost and 93- ITS ALL HYPE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2011, 10:54 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
11FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North Vancouver BC
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I regularly get 14 mpg US with 3 dirtbikes and 4 people in the truck pulling a 3500# travel trailer at 65 mph on roads that are not dead flat.
Old 07-20-2011, 10:58 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
pprior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 469
Received 33 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mustangGT90210
Why not have a loud truck? You get more power and those who like, can't get enough of it. Who doesn't want to hear a great sound whenever they hit the gas?
Why not, because there are many of us that HATE noise. Why in the world would I want to drive down the road hearing a droning engine noise. Ever drive a Lexus? The silence is golden.

I also hate cars that pull up behind me and you hear the fenders rattling off because of a booming stereo.

I guess it comes with age: "if it's too loud, you're too old" well yes I'm too old.

Give me a quiet truck any day. I'm not here to impress anyone.
Old 07-20-2011, 11:41 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,225
Received 167 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blackf1502011
At 4k I switched to Rotella FULL synthetic oil.
Did Rotella start making T6 in 5W30?

If your running Rotella T6 5W40, You might want to rethink that...

I love Rotella, and run it in many of my moto's, but the EcoBoost spec's a 5W-30 oil. WSS-M2C929-A. Jumping to a 40 weight in the 3.5TT, even with a great synthetic like Rotella, probably isn't your best move.
Old 07-21-2011, 06:07 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
TruckLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,268
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheKurgan

I guess to each his own. I think loud trucks are stupid. I mean why do you need a truck to sound like it is fast when it is not. A muscle car...now that's a different story. It sounds fast because it actually is.

That is definitely better than the Ecoboost, but we do make up for it in daily driving which my truck does more of.
My 6000 lb EcoBoost is quicker 0-60 and faster 1/4 mile than my '67 GTO was . In fact the EB outruns many of the muscle cars from back then. It even handles better than most did

Ain't that a bitch ?
Old 07-21-2011, 07:28 AM
  #45  
Better OUT then IN
 
justjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South Florida (Ft. Lauderdale area)
Posts: 3,343
Received 253 Likes on 206 Posts

Default

I tow two different loads regularly with my 5.0L

1. a toy hauler with two ATV's inside - fully loaded 8,000 pound - 8.5mpg at 65mph

2. a small trailer with one ATV in the bed and one on the trailer - fully loaded 1,500 pounds - 17mpg at 65mph

not towing at all - 20mpg at 65 mph.

Now, as I've said in previous posts - it all depends on the head wind but these numbers are pretty consistent.

Last edited by justjimmy; 07-21-2011 at 08:19 PM. Reason: Correct "not towing at all" mileage to 20mpg at 65mph
Old 07-21-2011, 08:18 PM
  #46  
Junior Member
 
mab01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St. George, Utah
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bosro
Well I've never even come close to getting 20mpg unloaded with any truck except a Ford Ranger.
Never got more than 10-12 mpg pulling with any 1/2 ton either.
Never had this much smooth silent and fun power....
Barely shifts cruising the highway where V8s kick down and make noise...
Only way I'm gonna have any remorse is if it falls apart,otherwise I'm hooked on the driving characteristics of the Ecoboost
I'd have to coast downhill in the 04 ford ranger 4.0 to even get close to 17 mpg. My ranger was as gas hungry as my f150. The f150 is twice the truck only sacrificing about 3 mpg compared to the ranger I had before.
Old 07-21-2011, 08:54 PM
  #47  
Member
 
windshear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North of the Fingerlakes, NY
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TruckLarry
My 6000 lb EcoBoost is quicker 0-60 and faster 1/4 mile than my '67 GTO was . In fact the EB outruns many of the muscle cars from back then. It even handles better than most did
So does a Honda Odyssey.
Old 07-21-2011, 09:02 PM
  #48  
Member
 
windshear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: North of the Fingerlakes, NY
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by justjimmy
I tow two different loads regularly with my 5.0L

1. a toy hauler with two ATV's inside - fully loaded 8,000 pound - 8.5mpg at 65mph

2. a small trailer with one ATV in the bed and one on the trailer - fully loaded 1,500 pounds - 17mpg at 65mph

not towing at all - 20mpg at 65 mph.

Now, as I've said in previous posts - it all depends on the head wind but these numbers are pretty consistent.
My 5.0 does almost exactly the same...with the exception that I haven't tried the heavy hauling yet. For now, the old diesel Ram is relegated to that role; plus I need to get a brake controller installed.

My light towing is with an 18' walleye boat and very little in the bed. I think the boat & trailer weight is around 2400 lbs.

Here in NY, cold weather takes a toll on mileage.
Old 07-21-2011, 11:08 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
begone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My results from 93 vs 87...

I'm getting about 1 MPG BETTER with the 93 AND it feels more "Peppy" - can't confirm the Butt Dyno (other than my butt), but I can with the MPG's. But nevertheless I'm filling up the truck with 87 cause of the price difference. I'll save the 93 on special occasions or when the Temps start to drop - Turbo engines LOVE lower Temps. Also, one thing I've noticed, I had to go through at least 1 full tank of whatever I was using for the ECU to recalibrate - how do I know, cause my numbers were WAY different on the 1st tank of gas than they were on the second of the same juice.

Anyways, your thread is false and it's probably cause your truck is a lemon or you didn't properly break it in - maybe both.
Old 07-22-2011, 09:04 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Joewee3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,831
Received 179 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

I've had 93 octane in my truck since my first fill up so I wouldn't be able to tells difference, however, my last fill up was with 0-ethanol 93 oct. There is a solid .5 mpg difference for the better and I have driven a great deal more city and alot of idle time. I will fill up at this same station every chance I get.



Quick Reply: Ecoboost and 93- ITS ALL HYPE



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.