Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost and 93- ITS ALL HYPE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2011, 11:50 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
jswd60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheKurgan
I guess to each his own. I think loud trucks are stupid. I mean why do you need a truck to sound like it is fast when it is not. A muscle car...now that's a different story. It sounds fast because it actually is.



That is definitely better than the Ecoboost, but we do make up for it in daily driving which my truck does more of.
Yeah because boost = low mpg
I do more pulling than unloaded so for me 5.0 works out better. In a few years when I'm not pulling a trailer everyday the eb will be in my garage (partly because we wont be allowed v8's anymore with obama's fuel economy plan). By then the eb should have way more power than necessary and 30 mpg I hope
Old 07-20-2011, 11:50 AM
  #12  
Haulin Bass!
 
Riccochet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 698
Received 42 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

I get around 16-17 mpg towing a 21" Gambler bass boat with my ecoboost. Wet weight loaded is just shy of 4000lbs.
Old 07-20-2011, 11:56 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
TheKurgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 211
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Riccochet
I get around 16-17 mpg towing a 21" Gambler bass boat with my ecoboost. Wet weight loaded is just shy of 4000lbs.
Yeah when asking about towing I should of mentioned the aerodynamics of what you're towing. I get 8mpg towing about 8000lbs, but my trailer is about 9 feet tall.
Old 07-20-2011, 12:33 PM
  #14  
Member
 
supermech21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So trade it in for a 5.0l.
Old 07-20-2011, 12:58 PM
  #15  
Just call me sean. Really
 
mustangGT90210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,257
Received 153 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TheKurgan
I guess to each his own. I think loud trucks are stupid. I mean why do you need a truck to sound like it is fast when it is not. A muscle car...now that's a different story. It sounds fast because it actually is.



That is definitely better than the Ecoboost, but we do make up for it in daily driving which my truck does more of.
Why not have a loud truck? You get more power and those who like, can't get enough of it. Who doesn't want to hear a great sound whenever they hit the gas?
Old 07-20-2011, 01:10 PM
  #16  
I Like Tires
 
BassAckwards's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,828
Received 248 Likes on 214 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mustangGT90210
Why not have a loud truck? You get more power and those who like, can't get enough of it. Who doesn't want to hear a great sound whenever they hit the gas?
Who wants to hear it driving by their house when they are trying to sleep? Or sitting in a restaurant trying to have dinner with their wife?

Don't get me wrong I like the sound of a nice V8 but most people over do it, especially with trucks. Even if they have a V6 they do it! Down right pisses me off when some D-Bag comes driving by with his loud *** truck thinking he's hard. That's why I went with the Dynomax VT muffler quiet in normal driving and only gets loud at WOT and it's still not even as loud as a Cherry Bomb at idle.

And don't take this a me attacking you if it sounds like it. I'm just sharing my displeasure with my experience of loud trucks.

Last edited by BassAckwards; 07-20-2011 at 01:13 PM.
Old 07-20-2011, 01:57 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
TheKurgan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 211
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by supermech21
So trade it in for a 5.0l.
I don't tow my car and trailer enough to justify the loss of daily driving gas mileage I'd get with a 5.0.

Originally Posted by mustangGT90210
Who doesn't want to hear a great sound whenever they hit the gas?
I do, but only if the sound and going fast are synchronous, which they are not with a truck.

Trucks == Workhorse
Mustang == Fasthorse
Old 07-20-2011, 02:03 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
superccs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 967
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Considering the power you were demanding from it at cruising speeds is minimal... the difference between the 87 fuel/ignition etc settings and the 93 would not effect anything. The throttle setting for 70mph cruising is essentially idle.

If you were running say the baja 1000 and actually put your foot down for considerable portions of your journey, then the 87 vs 93 would probably significantly different.

Oh and FYI, if you are just viewing threads at a forum for a while you are a Lurker, only when you start posting did you become a Troll :P
Old 07-20-2011, 02:05 PM
  #19  
Santa
 
santa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ethanol

I wonder what the difference is with/without ethanol. I believe you lose a little something going to ethanol so if your regular gas was non-ethanol and you went to premium with ethanol I would expect something less than a desired improvement. Locally there is no ethanol to be bought anywhere so I can't ever compare the two.
Old 07-20-2011, 02:17 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by santa
I wonder what the difference is with/without ethanol. I believe you lose a little something going to ethanol so if your regular gas was non-ethanol and you went to premium with ethanol I would expect something less than a desired improvement. Locally there is no ethanol to be bought anywhere so I can't ever compare the two.
I sure wish we had that problem...

This, directly from the EPA website: "...The EPA fuel economy tests use 100 percent gasoline, and no adjustments are made to account for ethanol. Most conventional vehicles using E10 (10 percent ethanol) will experience a 3 to 4 percent reduction in fuel economy."


Quick Reply: Ecoboost and 93- ITS ALL HYPE



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.