11screw50

you're right, the statement was meant as a general comment, I guess I should have worded it a little better. Generally, I dont post in EB threads unless I see a claim that in my opinion is a bit over the top and when I do, the post is relevant to the original post. subsequent posts may be off topic after the EB guys jump all over me and derail the thread.

heck, I've already said that my next truck will probably be an EB...

DieselDawg

Then you will be able to flame yourselfjust jokin'

Here is my "Diesel" Twin Turbo:

Superdave XL

I hope that you don't mind but I made that my screensaver !!

RickyBobby

How about you check the list and come report back to us which Ford engine is on that list.

http://wardsauto.com/reports/2011/tenbest/


I even included the link for you.

Scrappy Doo

iTrader: (1)

LMAO. There have been some great Ha Ha's in this thread so far.

borjeb

I saw that but that'd be like saying the 5.4 the pickup used was as good as the 5.4 the ford GT had. Or maybe a better one is the 4.6 in the 1993 Grand Marquis is th same as the dohc svt mustang. The pickup doesn't have the 5.0 on the list.

RickyBobby

Could you please explain to me the differences between a 5.0L in the 2011 Mustang and a 5.0L in a 2011 F150?

Heesman

What's the phrase - been there, done that and bought the t-shirt?

http://wardsauto.com/reports/2010/tenbest/

dmvfr

buy whatever floats yr boat... I tested both the eco and the 5.0 and bought the eco. I could really care less that eco gets better milage or not as the test drive between the two engines I liked the eco alot better and bought one. It`s easy to diss the eco if you have never driven one or have buyers remorse with the 5.0

gone postal

It's remarks like this that turn threads into pissing contests.