Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost 26gal tank

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2011, 04:35 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
gw1800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: PA.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
The things I can think of are. . .
- Additional vehicle weight reduces mileage. It's about 70 lb extra.
- Fuel aging. Gasohol absorbs some moisture from the atmosphere, which is BAD BAD BAD. Also, even regular gas goes bad when the light ends evaporate out. With a 36 gallon tank and 22 mpg, you can go nearly 800 miles on a tank. That could take some people 2 months to use up. Which brings me to my next point. . . summer and winter fuels are different formulations. If you fuel up in February but not again until April, you're driving with the wrong formulation. This could affect waxing and cold-starting.

No offense, but as I see it, most people are not getting 22mpg. If you took the over all average of people posting, I think it would average out to a little over 18mpg that would be around 648 per tank. Unless you bought your truck to sit in the driveway and only drive it occasionally, I think you would be fine with a 36gallon tank. 648 per tank equals one week of commuting to work and back alone for me.
Old 09-02-2011, 05:38 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
p38fln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Superior, WI
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Who drives less than 1,000 miles a month?
Old 09-02-2011, 06:07 PM
  #23  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,007
Received 3,933 Likes on 2,510 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by p38fln
Who drives less than 1,000 miles a month?
I've been averaging about 500 miles per month on my 2011. It's not my daily driver and will get used less than that this winter. I don't tow so I'm fine with the 26 gallon tank.
Old 09-02-2011, 08:11 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Guys, Ford has to design for what could happen, not just the average user.
Old 09-02-2011, 08:20 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
gw1800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: PA.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Guys, Ford has to design for what could happen, not just the average user.
Not sure what you mean? If they design for what could happen then you would think that a 36 gallon tank would be designed for what could happen..IMO....
Old 09-02-2011, 10:58 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
TruckLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,268
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by p38fln
Who drives less than 1,000 miles a month?
Me. About 2000 miles a year.
Old 09-02-2011, 11:56 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
dcfluid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Prince George, B.C.
Posts: 1,794
Received 108 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

I'm on holidays right now and towing my 27' 8000# travel trailer and the small tank is pissing me off.
With 100km between stations I dare not drive without a known fuel stop waiting for me. I'm not even in remote areas. I just pulled into Edmonton.
The switch will happen. My service manager said you can reprogram for the bigger tank. There is aftermarket tanks available.
Old 09-03-2011, 01:42 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gw1800
Not sure what you mean? ....
I said that if the EB had a 36 gallon tank, the user gets 22 mpg and drives 100 miles per week, the gas could absorb water or otherwise expire. Most people get less than 22 mpg and drive more than 100 miles per week, but Ford has to design for the worse case scenario. Note that this is just my theory as to why Ford may have held out on the big tank on the v6 trucks.

Even at 10 mpg, the 26 gallon tank is good for 260 miles. It might be pain for some to stop that often for gas, but I doubt there's that much distance between many stations.

Er, I'll say it this way: there are probably more paw paw's getting 22 mpg and driving 100 miles per week than there are people pulling 11,000 lbs 300 miles from one station to the nearest next.
Old 09-03-2011, 03:13 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
gw1800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: PA.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I said that if the EB had a 36 gallon tank, the user gets 22 mpg and drives 100 miles per week, the gas could absorb water or otherwise expire. Most people get less than 22 mpg and drive more than 100 miles per week, but Ford has to design for the worse case scenario. Note that this is just my theory as to why Ford may have held out on the big tank on the v6 trucks.

Even at 10 mpg, the 26 gallon tank is good for 260 miles. It might be pain for some to stop that often for gas, but I doubt there's that much distance between many stations.

Er, I'll say it this way: there are probably more paw paw's getting 22 mpg and driving 100 miles per week than there are people pulling 11,000 lbs 300 miles from one station to the nearest next.

Honestly, I think Ford didn’t go with the bigger tank on the EB because of the weight (even though it would have minimal effect on mpg's) and the fact that I don't think they had a TRUE idea of were the average MPG's where really at.
Old 09-03-2011, 08:35 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

That's entirely possible.


Quick Reply: Ecoboost 26gal tank



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.