Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

data log questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2015, 11:09 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EFFEXFO
Your values are also 0 so nothing was multiplied to fit on the same scale.

If he sent this to his tuner reading a knock high of 600+ and nearly 8k rpms and they said it looks good no knock. He should be more worried about finding a different tuner lol
What is multiplied? Here is a wot run. You will see the max and min did not go to the full range like his did. There was either a glitch, or during his startup or shutdown it tested the sensors. It is impossible to hit -300 rpm. That's my point. The tuner would look at those values and see something screwed up. But if you look at the values during his run they would be all reasonable numbers. The tuner looked past the false data and read his file.
And didn't you say yours did the same also where you said yours shows the max readout?

The value says zero because I don't have the graph selected, but that wouldn't change the max and min.
Attached Thumbnails data log questions-image.jpg  
Old 06-21-2015, 11:16 AM
  #22  
Member
 
EFFEXFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vozaday
What is multiplied? Here is a wot run. You will see the max and min did not go to the full range like his did. There was either a glitch, or during his startup or shutdown it tested the sensors. It is impossible to hit -300 rpm. That's my point. The tuner would look at those values and see something screwed up. But if you look at the values during his run they would be all reasonable numbers. The tuner looked past the false data and read his file.
And didn't you say yours did the same also where you said yours shows the max readout?
The value says zero because I don't have the graph selected, but that wouldn't change the max and min.

When you have multiple pids selected it can change the value so everything fits closely when you graph. Mine reads min max possible inputs but the graphs are spot on. Could be a difference in tuning that part I don't know.


Op what do your graphs look like?
Old 06-21-2015, 11:19 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EFFEXFO
When you have multiple pids selected it can change the value so everything fits closely when you graph. Mine reads min max possible inputs but the graphs are spot on. Could be a difference in tuning that part I don't know.


Op what do your graphs look like?
That was going to be my next question, OP can you please take a screen shot of where the 7600 rpm or 600 knock is on the graph?
Old 06-21-2015, 11:25 AM
  #24  
Member
 
EFFEXFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I could be wrong on that being absolute min/max I've only looked at the chart like 1 time lol I always use the graph. But the wacky readings are from his values being all jumbled.
Old 06-21-2015, 11:28 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EFFEXFO
I could be wrong on that being absolute min/max I've only looked at the chart like 1 time lol I always use the graph. But the wacky readings are from his values being all jumbled.
Agreed, the graph is the way a tuner would look at it. Not the max or min.
Old 06-21-2015, 02:52 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
raceredf150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 271
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts

Default



Here it is. If anyone wants the log PM me your email address and ill email the whole log to you to view
Old 06-21-2015, 03:19 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
raceredf150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 271
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Old 06-21-2015, 04:28 PM
  #28  
Member
 
EFFEXFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The second picture is showing your knock sensor pulling time. If you look your spark is right in line with it.

As for the first picture, I'm having a hard time reading it on my phone lol I'll look at the log tomorrow.

Last edited by EFFEXFO; 06-21-2015 at 04:56 PM.
Old 06-21-2015, 05:23 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
vozaday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,209
Received 146 Likes on 130 Posts

Default

The knock looks like it was at atmospheric pressure which would be at part throttle. It came down nicely.

The rpm one looks like a glitch, it is strange though. Wonder why it blipped like that.
Old 06-21-2015, 06:16 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
raceredf150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 271
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

So a postive knock count is a good thing? Also just did a stock tune log and same thing is happening...Showed battery voltage 220+volts cat temps upper 7000f. I only selected a few different pdi 's to log this time too. So i dono if im just dumb and doing something wrong or i need money for a new laptop or tuner lol


Quick Reply: data log questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.