Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Custom Tune just as quick as a Canned tune?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2014, 01:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hopelessbrand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 112
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Custom Tune just as quick as a Canned tune?

So I've taking my truck out to the strip the last few weeks...adding some mods as I go! Last week I took it out and ran 13.993 @ 97.0 MPH with an SCT 93 Pre-Programmed tune, then this week I ran 14.109 @ 97.8 MPH with a tune from MPT! The conditions were the same (weather-wise), spark plugs gapped at 028. and 18 Psi tire pressure launching at about 1500 rpm.

I dont have anything negative to say about the MPT tune....it uped the boost from 16psi to 21psi, the shifts were nice and firm and the throttle response was crazy!

Why would I run slower? I was hoping for a couple tenths quicker ofcourse, so it is a bummer...but yea!

any thoughts?
Old 06-21-2014, 01:27 PM
  #2  
Member
 
SlowFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Boutte, LA
Posts: 76
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

More tire slip? That could account for the higher mph but lower et

Need whole slip....what was the 60fts on both runs
Old 06-21-2014, 01:31 PM
  #3  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Ambient air and track temps different each day? That'll make a big difference.

.
Old 06-21-2014, 01:38 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hopelessbrand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 112
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlowFX4
More tire slip? That could account for the higher mph but lower et

Need whole slip....what was the 60fts on both runs
SCT 93 Pre-Program:
R/T: .450
60': 1.958
330': 5.749
1/8: 8.938 @ 77.31 mph
1000': 11.675
1/4: 13.993 @ 97.00 mph
Density Altitude: 3646 FT
Relative Density: 89.76%

MPT Tune:
R/T: .151
60': 2.147
330': 5.935
1/8: 9.101 @ 77.94 mph
1000': 11.813
1/4: 14.109 @ 97.80 mph
Density Altitude: 3912 FT
Relative Density: 89.05%
Old 06-21-2014, 01:41 PM
  #5  
Member
 
SlowFX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Boutte, LA
Posts: 76
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

You def had a worse launch that's where your et went
Old 06-21-2014, 02:15 PM
  #6  
Member

 
RLXXI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Big Easy
Posts: 26,680
Received 6,199 Likes on 4,672 Posts

Default

Same fuel station? Same track? The elevation air density is near 300' higher slip to slip. Maybe you had more head or cross winds. Things like that can all make a difference.

You also need to compare tunes on the same day not a week later if you want accurate comparisons.

.
Old 06-21-2014, 02:40 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
phantomblackgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Parkville, MO
Posts: 556
Received 90 Likes on 68 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Rnlcomp
Same fuel station? Same track? The elevation air density is near 300' higher slip to slip. Maybe you had more head or cross winds. Things like that can all make a difference.

You also need to compare tunes on the same day not a week later if you want accurate comparisons.

.
Fuel amount in tank also (1/4 tank vs full tank). Looks like you spun more on second pass. Could mean more hp/tq on second pass with more wheel spin and higher trap speeds. Still pretty quick for a full sized pickup.
Old 06-21-2014, 03:54 PM
  #8  
Texas Aggie
 
KMAC0694's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 2,344
Received 76 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

You 100% had a worse start. By the time you hit 1/8, you were already faster than your last pass. Reaction time was even 3/10 faster with the MPT pass, so you absolutely had to have spun or something.

Last edited by KMAC0694; 06-21-2014 at 04:00 PM.
Old 06-21-2014, 04:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hopelessbrand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 112
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I understand the 60' is where I lost the majority of the time.
but even two tenths? I understand there are a lot of variables but I was expecting maybe 13.5/13.6 passes....expectaions were maybe a lil high
Old 06-21-2014, 05:05 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
phantomblackgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Parkville, MO
Posts: 556
Received 90 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Reaction time means nothing unless running head to head. 60' is where you get the low et's.

At your trap speeds, I'd say .2 in the 60' would be at least .4-.5 in the quarter.

Last edited by phantomblackgto; 06-21-2014 at 05:17 PM.


Quick Reply: Custom Tune just as quick as a Canned tune?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.