Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Broken timing chains - 2011 Ecoboosts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2014, 01:34 PM
  #11  
International man of Myst
 
LastResort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 667
Received 166 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

That's some pretty damming numbers right there, do you have any sort of professional group that you could compare numbers with? I'm curious if other fleet managers are seeing the same things.
Old 01-12-2014, 02:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Honestly. This sounds about right. The ecoboost will turn out to be a giant turd but it will have nothing to do with the turbos making both sides of 3 years of internet bickering wrong!

Willl timiing chains be the next generation cam phasers?
Old 01-12-2014, 02:13 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Truckit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 201
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

My son works in the Toronto winters on snow removal for a landscape company. I don't know how many trucks they run but he told me that they have replaced all the Ecoboost F150s with 5.0s. One of my brothers works for a small equipment manufacturer here in Ontario that has started doing the same. I really don't have any hard facts on failures with either fleet.
Old 01-12-2014, 02:40 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

Neither engine is recommended for plowing....

Clutch packs are a known weakness in f150s for years. Same with diff leaks.
The following users liked this post:
B2E2RUN (01-13-2014)
Old 01-12-2014, 02:46 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Truck owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,346
Received 240 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Most EB owners don't treat there truck like a fleet owner who uses the truck at a different work load daily. I think if he is posting the true info then it does show some issues as these truck are put to the test every day and how they hold up as the miles rack up. 80k is a lot of hard miles on a 2011 truck but according to Ford should be holding up better. But I think the EB was more designed for the ave joe who tows w/in spec and uses as DD. This is what I wanted to see was how does this engine/parts hold up as it nears the 100k mark and above,,Would it be up to the task and remain reliable/durable..As more owners start getting to the 100k mark we will see what issues they might uncover..
The following 2 users liked this post by Truck owner:
11BLKFX4EB (01-12-2014), dlbb (05-11-2014)
Old 01-12-2014, 02:54 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I am starting to become very disappointed with Ford......especially their attitude. It's starting to appear like they are only interested in bragging about how many trucks they sell and not focused on quality/reliability.

I have had 3 turbos go (which actually aren't that expensive to replace) but I am not certain I will add anymore eco's to the fleet......not this year anyway.

One thing for sure is.......F-150 ecoboosts are generally not a good choice in a large fleet application. Mainly because driver's like and enjoy the power and typically will rod the **** out of them. They don't care about the company's trucks and they will spin the tires frequently and you will be repairing the re-diff on a regular basis. Because of the way they drive them you really don't see fuel economy any better than the old 4.6 or 5.4 either (although they are capable of really good economy).

You're better off with less power in a fleet truck!

Last edited by Chris74; 01-12-2014 at 02:56 PM.
The following users liked this post:
XLTOffRoad (01-16-2014)
Old 01-12-2014, 03:01 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Truckit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 201
Received 32 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
Neither engine is recommended for plowing....

Clutch packs are a known weakness in f150s for years. Same with diff leaks.
Sorry, I should have made it clearer. They use the F150s towing trailers for landscaping and use farm tractors with loaders for snow.
Old 01-12-2014, 03:05 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

........all of our trucks carry between 500-1000lbs on a daily basis and I generated my own fleet maintenance schedule for drivers to follow.

Here is a sample of some of our service intervals.....
Oil change intervals are every 6000-8000km's
Transmission service intervals - every 70,000km's
Rear diff inspection and service (if required) - every 50,000km
Air filters - every 25,000km
tune-up (plugs) every 100,000km

.........I don't know what I can do to prevent these timing chains from breaking though????? And like I said - The replacement timing chain is thicker/stronger looking than the original. Not sure what the 2012's and 13's will have???
Old 01-12-2014, 03:10 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Truck owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,346
Received 240 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris74
I am starting to become very disappointed with Ford......especially their attitude. It's starting to appear like they are only interested in bragging about how many trucks they sell and not focused on quality/reliability.

I have had 3 turbos go (which actually aren't that expensive to replace) but I am not certain I will add anymore eco's to the fleet......not this year anyway.

One thing for sure is.......F-150 ecoboosts are generally not a good choice in a large fleet application. Mainly because driver's like and enjoy the power and typically will rod the **** out of them. They don't care about the company's trucks and they will spin the tires frequently and you will be repairing the re-diff on a regular basis. Because of the way they drive them you really don't see fuel economy any better than the old 4.6 or 5.4 either (although they are capable of really good economy).

You're better off with less power in a fleet truck!


your right chris, you might be better off with the 3.7L engine to get job done..i can tell you if you drive the EB hard it sucks gas big time and you got no better gas mileage than a SD. Sorry to hear of mech issues with your fleet. I hope Ford stands behind its product and helps you with at least the parts. Makes you wish Ford offered a 150k warranty but at your failures they would be belly up..hope your able to get resolution..
Old 01-12-2014, 03:22 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Chris74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Truck owner
your right chris, you might be better off with the 3.7L engine to get job done.

....I have 4 trucks with 3.7. They all have been excellent so far.......but the 4 guys driving them are guys who definitely aren't hard on a truck.


Quick Reply: Broken timing chains - 2011 Ecoboosts



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.