Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Any proven fix for improving gas mileage eco boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2012, 02:28 PM
  #11  
Member
 
95cobby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Razorback150
Just for fun, here's my mileage log up to 15,000 miles. When I parked her for my deployment she had just over 25,000 miles and was averaging the same overall.
I also have a 2011 FX4 Screw with 3.73s and keep track of all my gas records. To date at 21,867 miles from brand new I have an avg MPG of 15.9. Looking at your records is making me think something is wrong with mine lol. My best tank was 19.7mpg and the next 2 are at 19mpg even.
Old 11-05-2012, 02:38 PM
  #12  
Senior Member/Vietnam Vet
 
SkiSmuggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern Vermont
Posts: 2,603
Received 539 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

I know what doesn't fix the fuel mileage: cold weather and snow tires! Just swapped my 18s for 17" snows and the temps dropped to the 30s. First one hundred miles I am showing 18 mpg instead of my usual 20+. According to my GPS with 18s I was going 65 when the speedo read 66.5. Now I have to have the speedo at 68 for the GPS to read 65.
Old 11-05-2012, 02:56 PM
  #13  
rbs
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
rbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Razorback150


I have recorded my mpg on every tank of gas on every vehicle that I have owned since 1995. My 21-23 mpg claim is dead accurate.

It seems that most of the people that are disappointed in the EB have unrealistic expectations. I have been hand calculating my MPG's on all of my vehicles since 1995. This includes the following:

'82 Chevy Luv dually with a built Toyota R22 - 20 mpg average

'95 Chevy S-10 4-cyl 25mpg city, 29mpt hwy (no ***** whatsoever, and broke constantly)

'01 Toyota Tacoma RCSB 4x4 4-cyl, 19mpg avg, best = 21mpg (Fun to drive, and awesome off-road)

'03 VW Golf 1.8t, 22avg, 28 best (drove it like I stole it most of the time)

'03 VW Jetta TDI, 45mpg avg city, 55mpg avg hwy (diesel FTW)

'05 VW Jetta 2.5, 24mpg avg, 26mpg best (gutless POS)

'08 VW Tiguan 2.0T AWD, 24-26mpg avg (really fun to drive)

'09 Subaru Forester 2.5na, 26mpg city, 30-32mpg hwy (best AWD system in snow EVER, I used WA D.C. as my personal rally track during the '09-'10 blizzards never got stuck, even in powder up to the windows, pulled a lot of trucks out too)

'10 Toyota Tacoma SCSB TRD off-road V-6 6-spd auto, 18.6mpg avg over 20,000miles 21.1mpg best, towing a 4,000lb trailer for three full tanks resulted in 12mpg avg HWY (ok torque, gutless up top)

'11 F-150 Screw Ecoboost FX4 3.73, 18.5mpg avg over 25,000miles 23.3 best (food for thought; this thing weights over 1,000lbs more than the '10 Toyota)

If you were expecting miracles out of a 1/2 ton pickup then I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I would like to sell you. Until you calculate your mpg's by hand and keep a log, you don't have a leg to stand on when you bitch about your poor fuel economy. I use my android phone and a mileage app these days to track my mpg and it gives me all kinds of geeky info about my fuel usage. This allows me to make meaningful comparisons from one tank to the other and accurately assess what is affecting my mpg's.

I clearly have too much free time...

As I mentioned in my previous post...did you check the plugs?

https://www.f150forum.com/f70/eco-sp...ug-gap-169457/

I am convince that people with these ridiculously low mpg claims are either driving far more aggressively than they are willing to admit or there is something wrong with their truck.

Check every fillup by calculator, most of the time is close to truck's computer. I will have the plugs checked at next oil change, getting ready to leave on a 100 mile trip, all interstate, will report back. wait a minute, I see that you are from Arkansas, better check your math

Last edited by rbs; 11-05-2012 at 03:02 PM. Reason: arkansas factor
Old 11-05-2012, 03:10 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
b316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 119
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

EPA Highway driving is at 45 MPH, not interstate but highway. Food for thought.
Old 11-05-2012, 03:40 PM
  #15  
Member
 
John50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 45
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b316
EPA Highway driving is at 45 MPH, not interstate but highway. Food for thought.
It took some searching, but here is the actual test protocol. It's not how I drive for sure.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml
The following 2 users liked this post by John50:
BCMIF150 (11-05-2012), bubbabud (11-08-2012)
Old 11-05-2012, 04:52 PM
  #16  
G2G
Senior Member
 
G2G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 133
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

RBS where do you live? I live in the Piedmont and there are enough hills on the highway that I can never get 24mpg. Hills will destroy your mileage, just the way it is. Go out to Kansas and drive on a flat highway at 65 and you'll see 24mpg on day long.

I agree there are exaggerations on both sides of the case, but I think people for the most part beat on their trucks more than they think and still expect to obtain 24mpg every trip.

- Steiner
The following users liked this post:
brucesears (11-05-2012)
Old 11-05-2012, 09:10 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by b316
EPA Highway driving is at 45 MPH, not interstate but highway. Food for thought.
Er, not exactly.

But to the OP, some EB's with the "condensation" issue have damaged a cat. It's possible that a damaged cat can restrict exhaust and lead to poor fuel economy. I would recommend you gut the cats, but it's illegal and requires one specific programmer to prevent the SES light from coming on.
Old 11-05-2012, 09:28 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
bubbabud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tonopah. AZ.
Posts: 3,380
Received 502 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

Your 1st problem is the 3.73 gears If you need them for towing at max then fine but with the EB torque curve taller gears are more efficient for light towing or daily driveing even the much poo pooed 3.15 and the EB torque make a great MPG package. 2nd next time you get on the road bring up the economy display and drive by how far up you can keep the green bar with a little patiants and practice you should easaly pick up 2 mpg. For what its worth my2011 scab with 20k has a lifetime average of 20.9 this includes about 5% towing and I live in the country and seldom get into town.
Old 11-06-2012, 08:11 AM
  #19  
Member
 
mike_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 37
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I drive a 2012 FX4 with Ecoboost and 3.73 gears, I have 2,300 miles on it and have averaged 19.7 MPG. That is 75% hiway, 25% city driving.
Old 11-06-2012, 09:48 AM
  #20  
Member
 
artdevilish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2013 Lariat 4x4, HD Tow, 3.73,EB, elephant ear mirrors, 6.5' bed, and only 1800 miles. My average fuel mileage is 13.9. On i95 and i 26 I kept it at 77 mph and averaged 14.8 mpg. Very rarely hit brakes.

on hwy 521 running 60-65 mph, (resetting once I get to speed), I can average almost 16 mpg.

Love Ford trucks. This is #5 for me since 2004. By far worse gas mileage I have ever had and I have always had the 5.4 liter.


Quick Reply: Any proven fix for improving gas mileage eco boost?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.