Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Another EcoBoost Race Truck Kicks Ass!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2012, 07:30 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MadocHandyman

Thanks pfbz!
Would love to see the highlights for that!
Figures the arguments would start right off the bat. :-(
Maybe that guy that argued with me, in the last Raptor/Ecoboost thread, that there are no turbocharged desert machines, will come and read up. I was going to pass on DanZio's website to prove him wrong but figured why bother.
For a long time there wasn't a class for them because of reliability issues. When the Eco ran Baja with no engine issues it opened the possibility - this new class is the result.

I'm not arguing with anything in the article, just the statement that since the engine does well in a 4000lb vehicle it would be good in a 6000lb vehicle.

Last edited by WarSurfer; 04-19-2012 at 07:32 AM.
Old 04-19-2012, 09:56 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pfbz
450HP should be easily achievable without any internal mods... Just intake, exhaust, and ECU tuning.
totally agree. the Livernois tune with a very small increase in boost puts the Eco close to those numbers already.

Now, if ^^^that^^^ eco came from the factory with a warranty, then yes - it would be a good engine in the Raptor 450hp/500tq... Even I can't deny that goodness.

Last edited by WarSurfer; 04-19-2012 at 10:05 AM.
Old 04-19-2012, 10:09 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
kds083's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: St. Joseph, Mi
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Bet that intake from the intercooler doesn't come from the bottom sucking in moisture with it like the rest of ours.
Old 04-19-2012, 10:24 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WarSurfer

For a long time there wasn't a class for them because of reliability issues. When the Eco ran Baja with no engine issues it opened the possibility - this new class is the result.
I was just sort of pointing out that people will argue before they even gather all the facts.
I may have even been guilty of that a time or two ;-)
Old 04-19-2012, 10:25 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kds083
Bet that intake from the intercooler doesn't come from the bottom sucking in moisture with it like the rest of ours.
I don't think they'll have to worry. They'll have it floored the whole time they're running it! Won't have a chance to collect moisture :-)
Old 04-19-2012, 11:37 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
11screw50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,577
Received 482 Likes on 304 Posts

Default

If I had to guess, the comment about 450hp 'bone stock' is probably right on...'bone stock' meaning the form they receive the engine in from their supplier, not stock as it comes in any mass produced vehicle that Ford sells.

And really, if it's good for 600hp on stock internals, that's still pretty impressive, besides, torque gets you moving, hp determines how much work you can do (ie top end) and we know it makes darn close to the 6.2 when both are in the form installed in the F150, who knows how the torque compares when each is bumped up to 600hp.
Old 04-19-2012, 11:47 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
DieselDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Posts: 1,270
Received 117 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

In stock form...yes there is an advantage in fuel mileage...BUT...in full out racing I doubt it will make a HUGE DIFF like the authors "blog" states. Of course we are all couch racing right now. I just like the fact that they are working with the engine (3.5L)!
Old 04-19-2012, 12:02 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
kds083's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: St. Joseph, Mi
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MadocHandyman

I don't think they'll have to worry. They'll have it floored the whole time they're running it! Won't have a chance to collect moisture :-)
Ha ha good idea, I'll just have to floor it everywhere I go.
Old 04-19-2012, 12:09 PM
  #19  
Boost :)
 
TJPlatinumEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,329
Received 440 Likes on 328 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WarSurfer

You Eco guys are funny. You always bring up the 2jz, RB26det(t) and the GTR knowing full well those are factory forged engines.
I can't speak for the RB or VQ in the GTR, but the 2JZ is NOT a factory forged engine. I have built them and been tuning them for 10 years. USDM 2JZ-GTE (twin turbo) motors have Hyper pistons just like the EB. It does have forged rods and crank though. It has made over 1000rwhp in stock form, although it doesn't last too terribly long that way
Old 04-19-2012, 01:38 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
pfbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,225
Received 167 Likes on 103 Posts

Default

Topic = EcoBoost in desert racing applications.

Topic ≠ Comparative speculation and comparison to import sports cars, forged pistons, etc., and 'why the EcoBoost is not as good as my Raptor 6.2 engine'.


Quick Reply: Another EcoBoost Race Truck Kicks Ass!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.