Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test

Old 04-06-2014, 04:45 PM
  #21  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

Believe fuel gets to crankcase on early spray of fuel then compression cycle sprays more much the same as diesel fuel gets in crankcase with blow by too. Fuel doesnt spray once like port injection and vapor with the air same way.

Last edited by papa tiger; 04-06-2014 at 04:48 PM.
papa tiger is offline  
Old 04-27-2014, 08:00 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,837
Received 373 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

I thought I'd add a post to keep this thread alive since it is taking me awhile to get enough miles on the truck for valid results. Now that spring weather is finally arriving, I haven't been putting as many miles on it since I'm busy. But I have around 600 miles on the test set up so far. I emptied the cans recently and recorded the volumes to date. I'd like to wait until I get to 1000 miles before posting the results from the test, but I'll give some preliminary feedback.

- Emptying process -
First the UPR. I'm used to emptying the UPR can regularly, so it's not a big deal to unscrew, guide the can out from between the hoses, pour it out, guide it back in between the hoses, get it lined up carefully (so I don't cross thread the soft aluminum) and screw it back up snug. All that takes less than a few minutes so it's rather easy.
Now the RX can. Raise the hood, hold an empty water bottle under the drain tube, open the valve, close the valve, close the hood. I kid you not, it takes no more time than it took to read those steps. I knew it would be easy to empty, but it is ridiculously easy.

_ The weather so far -
During the first week of the test we had winter weather, with some snow. Since then we have had mild weather. Temperatures are in the 50's and 60's most days.

- What they caught so far -
I won't share the amounts yet, but I'll give some info. The UPR can has caught a 'mostly oil with a bit of water' mixture so far. The RX can (in line after the UPR) has had just the opposite. It's collected mostly water or fuel, with some oil mixed in.
I emptied the UPR first, and I would estimate it has collected the normal amount compared to what it usually does I empty it. I was pleased that my set up with 2 cans didn't seem to change the normal flow and collection I was used to seeing with just the UPR can. When I was about the turn the valve to empty the RX, I paused to a few seconds wondering if anything would come out. After all it was a new can that would need to get some oil/water coated on the inside before there would be enough to drip to the bottom (The UPR can had been in use for many months and although I cleaned the can I did not rinse off the filter material). Plus I wondered if the valve of the RX can protruded up into the can, and if it required some liquid to collect before there was enough to spill over that valve nipple and exit the can. Then I opened the valve and I had to smile when I had some liquid drain out. I thought all along that if it caught more than 10% of what the UPR was collecting, I would be surprised. It's still early in the test, and I would like to redo the test after reversing the order of the cans later, but I am surprised so far. I'm hoping to get more miles on the truck soon so I can wrap up this phase of the test.

Last edited by Ford850; 04-27-2014 at 08:03 PM.
Ford850 is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by Ford850:
bluedsteel (04-28-2014), Chris's FX4 (04-27-2014)
Old 04-27-2014, 09:28 PM
  #23  
FX4 SCrew TT'd V6
 
mrpositraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,999
Received 125 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

Good stuff! Keep it coming.
mrpositraction is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 12:31 AM
  #24  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

So the RX is getting what the UPR isn't trapping and that is mostly H2O + fuel oil mix as advertised. Nice! Is it an equal amount of cc's in each.
papa tiger is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 12:19 PM
  #25  
Member
 
jgiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 533
Received 50 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Not sure if I missed this, but does your UPR can have the extension on it?
jgiddy is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 12:36 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
Jrudol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 25
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Subd
Jrudol1 is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 01:34 PM
  #27  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

The RX cans drain does protrude slightly into the bottom so there will be a small amount that will still be in it when drained.

And Yes, the extension does help the UPR & if you have one I strongly recommend adding it. It is an excellent option for increasing the capacity.

The entire goal with a separation system is to catch all the gunk from reaching the intake air charge, and there are hundreds of cans to choose from, but to date, (and we purchase and test and then dissect most every can on the market) the most effective ones come to a total of 4 (and even though the 3 others are direct competitors, our testing shows they also work very well, and they dont pay us to state the results...in fact the # 2 ranked has never to our knowledge acknowledged how well we rank them):

RX
SMC
Elite E2
Apex.

All other to date, even 2 costing over $500, were not effective enough to rank. We only rank those that catch at least 85-90% of the oil/water/fuel/sulfuric acid/etc. gunk that would normally be ingested directly into the intake air charge.

And that is why the ones listed above are excluded in the challenge as they work very well as far as efficiency and I would not hesitate to run any of them on my own vehicles either.

Nice to see independant testing done to confirm what we have shown for years. This test should really be done over several thousand miles, but by 1000 miles on average you will have a good idea.

Also a note, when we test we start with a brand new can so there is no saturation already resent in the media, but the results are dramatic enough usually that by 1000 miles it should be very clear.

Tuner Boost is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 02:08 PM
  #28  
Member
 
jgiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 533
Received 50 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

One thing I dislike about the UPR: the drain bolt. It's such a PITA that it's faster and easier to just remove the whole thing and pour it out of the can.
Also I had to put like 100ft/lbs of torque on that drain bolt to keep it from leaking. Thought I was going to rip the bolt head off just getting it tight enough. And the drain hole is incapable of removing the last few tablespoons of oil at the bottom of the can.

Last edited by jgiddy; 04-28-2014 at 02:20 PM.
jgiddy is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 02:14 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
boost74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 769
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jgiddy
One thing I dislike about the UPR: the drain bolt. It's such a PITA that it's faster and easier to just remove the whole thing and pour it out of the can.
Also I had to put like 100ft/lbs of toqrue on that drain bolt to keep it from leaking.
Same here, wouldnt mind and in depth instructions from someone who has this installed already.
boost74 is offline  
Old 04-28-2014, 02:46 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,837
Received 373 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jgiddy
Not sure if I missed this, but does your UPR can have the extension on it?
My UPR does not have the extension.
Ford850 is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.