Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2014, 09:23 PM
  #231  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,839
Received 374 Likes on 228 Posts

Default

I will have phase 3 wrapped up later in the week. I'll check back in then with some results!
Ford850 is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 08:35 AM
  #232  
F150 Forum
 
Joe@UPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 88
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Wayne,

I have been rigorously testing different media to maximize the Coalescing effect. Latest update reflects that the Coalescing effect of the SS media is mediocre at best. A company has been supply us with different samples of oil absorbent material that will eliminate the oil pull through because the new media has a much better coalescing effect.

I have been testing this on the smallest highest flow catch can application to exaggerate the effect and truly see how good the new media is working. I can say that it has been eye opening to see how much airspeed and media containment improved the efficiency.

I have a samples here if you would like to test it and see for yourself the overall improvement. I am driven to develop the best performance and results for all of us to be able to rely on. PM me so I can get you setup with the new media.
Joe@UPR is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Joe@UPR:
Eco Tuner (06-23-2014), JDsFiddy (06-23-2014)
Old 06-23-2014, 11:03 AM
  #233  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks Joe. I PM'd you.


Wayne
70monte is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 12:37 PM
  #234  
Senior Member
 
nix150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 894
Received 115 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Tracy, can you share some of the results (if any) of the dealer testing that was being done? I'm not an EB owner but I'm curious as to the results - you'd mentioned that there were about 23 or so that we're "subjects"...
nix150 is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 12:39 PM
  #235  
Senior Member
 
nix150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 894
Received 115 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

I'm going in for an oil change in a few weeks and can't wait to empty the can in front of SM that claims nothing is caught! HAHAHA!
nix150 is offline  
Old 06-23-2014, 05:11 PM
  #236  
F150 Forum
 
Eco Tuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 241
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Name:  RhinelandreccomendationonRXcan_zps5d40da1d.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  110.2 KB

This is really all that can be released in public.

As far as the price they are quoting be aware that this is exchange rate to Canada, and is the Monster system (the only one they wanted to use in the cold climate) and this is installed at a well known dealer.

Eco Tuner is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 09:53 AM
  #237  
Senior Member
 
nix150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 894
Received 115 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Eco Tuner


This is really all that can be released in public.

As far as the price they are quoting be aware that this is exchange rate to Canada, and is the Monster system (the only one they wanted to use in the cold climate) and this is installed at a well known dealer.

Nice! I look forward to hearing more! Good work!
nix150 is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 02:12 PM
  #238  
Senior Member
 
Shaggy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 754
Received 126 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Joe@UPR
Wayne,

I have been rigorously testing different media to maximize the Coalescing effect. Latest update reflects that the Coalescing effect of the SS media is mediocre at best. A company has been supply us with different samples of oil absorbent material that will eliminate the oil pull through because the new media has a much better coalescing effect.

I have been testing this on the smallest highest flow catch can application to exaggerate the effect and truly see how good the new media is working. I can say that it has been eye opening to see how much airspeed and media containment improved the efficiency.

I have a samples here if you would like to test it and see for yourself the overall improvement. I am driven to develop the best performance and results for all of us to be able to rely on. PM me so I can get you setup with the new media.
While I applaud your quest to make your product better, it doesn't help those of us that have spent hundreds of dollars already on what we thought was a fix to this issue. Seems to me like you should not market your product until it is the 100% solution or offer free upgrades cause in this constant quest I would not expect my customers to keep paying for this interim fixes your coming up with!
Shaggy1970 is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 02:46 PM
  #239  
Senior Member
 
gDMJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Timbuk3, MI
Posts: 11,854
Received 2,527 Likes on 1,951 Posts

Default

Shaggy1970 - While I applaud your quest to make your product better, it doesn't help those of us that have spent hundreds of dollars already on what we thought was a fix to this issue. Seems to me like you should not market your product until it is the 100% solution or offer free upgrades cause in this constant quest I would not expect my customers to keep paying for this interim fixes your coming up with!
I too was one of very early buyers, however, I don't fault UPR for getting a product to market that was less $$$$$ and (at the time IMO) was comparable to others that had been out there even longer. If makers would wait to sell only 100% solutions, NOTHING would ever come to market.

And while discouraged that the upgrades were not compatible with the previous offering, I was satisfied with the fact that the *new* release with the diffuser, extension, etc. was made available to me at a considerably reduced co$t (thanks to Bryan).

As for any future upgrades, I would expect them to be compatible with the current can spec's and offered at an upgrade discount. ATTENTION UPR: Hint. Hint. Hint.

As for the -old- can ... It's made it's way to another of my vehicles.
.
gDMJoe is offline  
Old 06-24-2014, 03:05 PM
  #240  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I think that most people focus on the amount of oil that is captured in a catch can and not on whether or not any oil is still getting through to the intake. Most people have no reason to check the output line for oil so they don't think to do so.


When I first put on my UPR catch can last August and ran it for awhile, I was very impressed on how much oil it was catching. It wasn't until I had to replace the hoses that I was using because they were seeping oil, that I discovered that there seemed to be a lot of oil still making it's way to the intake. I was not happy about that since the main reason I bought one of these things was to prevent oil from getting to the intake.


I'm glad that UPR is still trying to improve their product since everyone benefits. I know that in my case, UPR has given me some great CS and has stepped up and made some things right.


Wayne
70monte is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.