Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2014, 08:16 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,838
Received 373 Likes on 227 Posts

Default 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test

I’ve had a UPR catch can on my 5.0 since last summer. It catches a lot, especially in the cold months. But I’ll get right to my test. I added an RX can inline after my UPR can to see if the UPR was missing anything. And if it was allowing some to pass through, was it enough for the RX to catch anything? I don’t drive a lot of miles regularly since my F150 is not a daily driver, so my results will take some time. This thread is to document how I set it up and what I catch over time.
I installed the RX can just as the directions explained, but I routed the hoses differently. I left my UPR can right where it’s been for months, but rerouted one hose. I left the hose from the passenger side of the engine to the inlet of the UPR can. Then a new hose from UPR can outlet, routed to the inlet of the RX can. The RX outlet hose goes back to the engine. The PCV exhaust now flows from the engine, through the UPR, then through the RX, and finally back up to the engine intake.
Before installing everything for the test, I cleaned the UPR can thoroughly. The bottom of the can (inside) was covered with a thin layer of stiff sludge that I could only clean out using gas. I’m glad that was caught, along with the ounces of oil, water, etc, over the months I’ve been emptying it. But I was surprised at the outlet hose from the UPR can. It was wet with oil. Obviously some was getting through the can and back to my intake. I’ve never let the can get close to half full before emptying it. Nearly every time I’ve emptied it, there was 1/4“ or less in the bottom. I’m noting this in case someone thinks I left the UPR get overfilled and it flowed through. Nevertheless, I started this test after cleaning everything for a fresh start.
I plan to leave this setup on for a thousand miles or so, and report my findings from each can.
1st picture: UPR can as it was originally installed.
2nd: CleanUPR can.
3rd: RX can installed. The hose in the top center of the can is the inlet. The outlet hose on the right has a check valve.
4th: Engine outlet to UPR inlet on left of can. UPR outlet on right side of can routed around (smaller hose) to the RX inlet. You can also see the other smaller hose coming back up from the RX can and ending at the intake on the engine.


Attached Thumbnails 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test-p1010484c.jpg   5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test-p1010485c.jpg   5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test-p1010487c.jpg   5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test-p1010488c.jpg  

Last edited by ymeski56; 06-01-2014 at 02:54 PM.
Ford850 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 08:28 AM
  #2  
CRJ
Member
 
CRJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 82
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

great idea! i was just looking at the UPR can to add to my 5L, so this is good to know.
CRJ is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:21 AM
  #3  
End of the Earth
 
Chris's FX4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,590
Received 377 Likes on 287 Posts

Default

Subbed.
Chris's FX4 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 10:02 AM
  #4  
Member
 
FullMetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 39
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

This should be good. Lots of answers to many catch can questions will be had from this.
FullMetal is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 11:06 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Rheller1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: White Bear Lake,MN
Posts: 132
Received 99 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

are you gonna try the upr can after the rx can to see if the rx can catches everything as well?
Rheller1 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 02:59 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
BRUTE448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,117
Received 158 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

sub'd
BRUTE448 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 04:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
snobdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 652
Received 189 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rheller1
are you gonna try the upr can after the rx can to see if the rx can catches everything as well?
Yes, both ways should be checked...
snobdds is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 04:31 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Z7What's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 6,130
Received 871 Likes on 695 Posts

Default

Can't wait to see the out come.

Link in the RX please.

Wayne
Z7What is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 04:44 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
snobdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 652
Received 189 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rheller1
are you gonna try the upr can after the rx can to see if the rx can catches everything as well?
Double post
snobdds is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 01:08 AM
  #10  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

Why not just hook up the RX can by itself and see it work. If you increase your volumn you have your answer. Why mess around the mumbo jumbo BS. You run the risk of not having a properly functioning PCV. The RX is designed to do the job properly Obviously you do not believe your other one works 100%. The traps work best when a filter/separator medium is added into them. You want the Vapor to condense in the trap and mostly air going to the intake. So get the empty one out of there for now. MHO
Not questioning your reasoning, just the design application. The sizes of your hoses seem way out of spec for the PCV system. Get them out of there and the right ones in place.

Last edited by papa tiger; 04-05-2014 at 02:34 AM.
papa tiger is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Raptor2014 (06-13-2014)


Quick Reply: 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 PM.