Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 Turbocharger Kit!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 08:32 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

right at the end of a header (mid mount) is ideal! instant spool, if piping and a/r are sized accordingly, and no excess heat introduced to the engine bay. the only downfall, road clearance and oil scavenging.
Old 06-21-2012, 08:33 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by klumb15

Lag has more to do with turbo sizing than distance away from the cylinder. I've seen a rear mount system with a properly sized turbo (possibly on the small side) boost faster than a front mount system with an oversized turbo. You're disregarding the most important parameter of a turbo system, the A/R.
I'm not disregarding anything. I was simply stating location of the turbo doesn't necessarily impact spool time.
Old 06-21-2012, 09:50 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
klumb15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 674
Received 55 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WarSurfer
I'm not disregarding anything. I was simply stating location of the turbo doesn't necessarily impact spool time.
I must have misinterpreted what you said then. What you said above is absolutely correct. Like jcain said, right after the exhaust manifold is ideal. Hot exhaust gas has much more energy (velocity) than cooler exhaust gas. However, turbo technology isn't like it used to be and you can manipulate the system any way you want and adjust the A/R on the hotside accordingly. I'd love to see a twin turbo 5.0 F150 setup just like the ecoboost. Maybe Ford will build us one for the F250!
Old 06-22-2012, 01:51 PM
  #14  
F150 Forum
 
ajusa.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Mira Mesa, CA
Posts: 438
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

If you are mentioning turbo and MPG in the same thread, leave it stock.
Old 06-22-2012, 02:02 PM
  #15  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajusa.com
If you are mentioning turbo and MPG in the same thread, leave it stock.

More
Petrol
Gulped

More
Power
Guaranteed

Old 06-22-2012, 04:47 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
klumb15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 674
Received 55 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajusa.com
If you are mentioning turbo and MPG in the same thread, leave it stock.
Not necessarily true. A member on LS1GTO has a 700+ rwhp twin turbo GTO that still pulls high 20's in the MPG department (highway). When you stay out of boost, you can be rewarded with good fuel economy. However, when you want to utilize all of the boost, you can watch the gas gauge needle go down. Supercharged setups tend to get less MPG due to parasitic loss, but even that market has changed substantially. TVS blowers have free wheel capability and a integral bypass valve to reduce parasitic losses resulting in better fuel economy compared to yesterdays blowers in off boost situations.
Old 06-22-2012, 05:34 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by klumb15

Not necessarily true. A member on LS1GTO has a 700+ rwhp twin turbo GTO that still pulls high 20's in the MPG department (highway). When you stay out of boost, you can be rewarded with good fuel economy. However, when you want to utilize all of the boost, you can watch the gas gauge needle go down. Supercharged setups tend to get less MPG due to parasitic loss, but even that market has changed substantially. TVS blowers have free wheel capability and a integral bypass valve to reduce parasitic losses resulting in better fuel economy compared to yesterdays blowers in off boost situations.
At 700+ on my procharger setup I could dip into high 20s with the 6spd no problem. Motor was way more effecient at that point.
Old 06-22-2012, 07:06 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
klumb15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 674
Received 55 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jcain
At 700+ on my procharger setup I could dip into high 20s with the 6spd no problem. Motor was way more effecient at that point.
Nice. I haven't played around too much with prochargers. SOFAKING was the member I was referring too. His setup still amazes me. I think he's in the upper 700's now with OEM intake, heads, crank, and cam. Forged pistons, rods, and upgraded valvetrain is about the extent of his engine build. Most people simply don't understand that performance mods increase motor efficiency and will typically yield better fuel economy during easy driving.

How's the TT build going?
Old 06-22-2012, 08:25 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Shan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by klumb15
Not necessarily true. A member on LS1GTO has a 700+ rwhp twin turbo GTO that still pulls high 20's in the MPG department (highway). When you stay out of boost, you can be rewarded with good fuel economy. However, when you want to utilize all of the boost, you can watch the gas gauge needle go down. Supercharged setups tend to get less MPG due to parasitic loss, but even that market has changed substantially. TVS blowers have free wheel capability and a integral bypass valve to reduce parasitic losses resulting in better fuel economy compared to yesterdays blowers in off boost situations.
I would think staying out of the throttle would be a better way to put it as boost simply makes an engine more efficient... not having to suck air in and all. :o
Old 02-27-2015, 01:41 PM
  #20  
The pug life chose me.
 
5.Ohno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Camrose Alberta
Posts: 182
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Anyone done the remote mount with an oil-less turbo? I feel that would be the way to go.


Quick Reply: 5.0 Turbocharger Kit!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.