Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 architecture

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2014, 10:13 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pittsburgh Pa
Posts: 2,121
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Does the Mustang and F150 engines share the same intake manifold part numbers? Generally truck intakes have longer runners to promote more low end torque.
Old 06-23-2014, 10:26 PM
  #22  
F150 Forum

iTrader: (4)
 
Bdukes55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scottsboro, AL
Posts: 918
Received 247 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wannafbody
Does the Mustang and F150 engines share the same intake manifold part numbers? Generally truck intakes have longer runners to promote more low end torque.
I believe that yes, the stock 5.0 in the GT Mustang and the F150 use the same intake manifold. Someone that knows for sure can probably come in and verify this for sure though.
Old 06-23-2014, 11:34 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bdukes55
I believe that yes, the stock 5.0 in the GT Mustang and the F150 use the same intake manifold. Someone that knows for sure can probably come in and verify this for sure though.
The part numbers are the same, but visually you can see that the mustang has a gray top. I believe someone actually compared the two and they were identical otherwise.
Old 06-24-2014, 11:20 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
gDMJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Timbuk3, MI
Posts: 11,854
Received 2,527 Likes on 1,951 Posts

Default

Wannafbody - Does the Mustang and F150 engines share the same intake manifold part numbers? ...
..." intake manifold (color change only, no difference in size or shape)"...
Excerpted from ... *.above
Old 06-24-2014, 12:01 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
iFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Posts: 1,545
Received 162 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

20-30 year old technology? Man, I'm talking good old flathead V8s! Now that boys, was an engine
Old 07-08-2014, 12:48 PM
  #26  
for fastening fabric
 
safetypin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: san joaquin valley
Posts: 934
Received 152 Likes on 117 Posts

Default

different intake cams, same exhaust cams, same heads (iirc), different intake, diff headers, compression, piston squirters, same valve springs

the truck, from the dynos i saw, made lower torque than the GT the whole way through, and the GT spanks on the top end. I think the truck was sandbagged so the EcoBoost would have the higher HP rating.

product segmentation, imo, had Ford trying to weaken the 5.0 so the light stays shining on the Ecoboost. If the Ecoboost made 380HP from the factory, I think the 5.0 would've made 370-375. The 5.0s rated HP is a result of the Ecoboost's rated HP, and Ford trying to keep its HP lower than the EB so the layman knows which engine is intended to be better.
Old 07-08-2014, 01:49 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
gDMJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Timbuk3, MI
Posts: 11,854
Received 2,527 Likes on 1,951 Posts

Default

safetypin ...
same heads (iirc)
No.

different intake
No.

...the 5.0 would've made 370-375 ...
Burning E85 fuel boosts 5.0 engine power to 375 hp and 390 pounds-feet of torque, said Mike Harrison, Ford's program manager for V-8 engines. - 2011 Ford F-150 5.0-liter V-8 Gains Power Burning E85 Ethanol
.
Old 07-08-2014, 03:05 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
t.mackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: alberta
Posts: 101
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

From everything I've read on the mustang boards is what was posted two posts above me, it's all in the headers and tuning but I read it was the exhaust cam that was a little different but the vvti is entirely different programming. It's funny all the stang guys want the truck motor for ease of strapping on forced induction.
Now that I have said what I read, what's this arguement about? And why are everyone's panties all wadded up. The motors are very close not like we're comparing a 302 to the 5.0 or an lq7 to an ls
Old 07-08-2014, 10:35 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
gDMJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Timbuk3, MI
Posts: 11,854
Received 2,527 Likes on 1,951 Posts

Default

t.mackenzie ... The motors are very close not like we're comparing a 302 to the 5.0 ...
Ummmm ... The 5.0L is a 302(CI), just not a Windsor series engine.

...lq7 to an ls
When did FoMoCo ever make these?
.
Old 07-09-2014, 01:10 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
t.mackenzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: alberta
Posts: 101
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I never said ford made chevy motors, just comparing their truck and car series with are only the same in displacement(lq9 and ls3) like the vvti 5.0 and old 5.0s and 302s only share displacement. Where both the gt motor and the 150 are almost the same motor minus headers, pistons and a slight bit of cam timing along with a small bit of sandbagging.

Sorry for referencing another companies engines to further illistrate a point


Quick Reply: 5.0 architecture



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.