5.0 architecture
#11
Bar Stool Racer
Thread Starter
Thanks for all your answers. I am new to this engine and just wondered what external parts could cross to the truck. Once again, thanks for the feedback.
Frank
Frank
#12
Truck
360 hp @5500 rpm
380 Tq @4250 rpm
Mustang
412 hp @6500 rpm
390 Tq @4250 rpm
#13
Member
Well then maybe you can explain why the engines are different. Must be some reason Ford built them differently.
.
#14
Towing durability from what Ford has stated and what is done...Lower compression, Lower ignition timing, Different intake cam (truck doesn't need to have power to 6500 rpm), same exhaust cam (ford uses the exhaust cams for torque values mainly), Different TIVCT cam timing (even less power output for the truck), Oil cooler on the truck for towing (not on the mustang), Cast manifolds on the truck for towing durability(thin manifolds on the mustang) Same heads, with same size intake valves for both car and truck, Different pistons (Higher compression for the car, lower compression for the truck)...Those are the main differences off the top of my head.
#15
Member
So it's basically exactly what I said to begin with, the Mustang was made to build speed fast and the truck down low for towing etc....
Imagine that.
.
Imagine that.
.
#16
#17
Member
2 identical trucks side by side pulling the same trailer with the same load.
1 has it's intended engine the other has a car engine.
The truck with the intended engine will out perform the other, do you disagree?
Which engine will also last longer?
.
#18
Yes, I disagree that the truck engine will out perform the car engine in the truck body. Now on the durability, I believe the truck engine has the car engine beat in the truck body.
#19
Senior Member
Also, the oils pumps are different, the truck has a weaker pump.h
The following users liked this post:
MoreauFord (06-23-2014)
#20
Member
Maybe I should stop trying to apply 20-30 y/o technology with current.
.
.