3.5L Ecoboost New Misfire Fix TSB Jan 2014
#41
Senior Member
Fair point I think but for a tuner noob like myself how would a 87oct tune here directly improve this issue? I know we've been talking about the PCM update possibly changing the tune to help, or assuming, but I've never hear folks say a sct tune or other is the way to go to have this issue fixed. Does the SCT tune by default adjust things to correct this issue?
Again this isn't challenging at all. I know very little about tunes and never done one and likely wouldn't. I can't pay to play.
Again this isn't challenging at all. I know very little about tunes and never done one and likely wouldn't. I can't pay to play.
As far as if the update takes power away, you can always get it back by getting an aftermarket tune. That's what I had to do on my '11...that or drive a truck with 30% less HP and TQ. Its just that after Ford did the update it was a struggle to even get an aftermarket tune to function correctly in my truck.
#42
The Ford Hotline engineers didn't even have the information on what exactly changed in the tune, oh well I tried. Someone is just going to have to be the guinea pig here and with the rainy season ahead I am sure I will see my share of customers coming into the dealer wanting the fix.
#43
Senior Member
I may have gained some low end response with it, but it was RICH----real rich. In 200 miles I looked like I was driving a diesel----my rear bumper was saturated by carbon build-up.
MPG dropped big time to like 16.2-16.5 HWY (Prior to the flash I had got about 19-21mpg) on trips up north. The turbos spool faster but it is CONSTANTLY in boost at like 62-65mph.
#44
I agree with you, all OEM IC's are pretty small and inefficient anyway.
This the 2013+ CAC have what appear to be foam pieces internally that prevent efficiency. It basically looks like they attempted to do everything possible to raise the temps in the CAC in a hope to vaporize the condensate, IMHO.
I pulled the top plate and mine and in about 200 miles had the limp mose issue in the rain. Threw that sucker right back on and have had no issues since.
All I know WBY5 box code that they flashed me to SUCKS royally.
I pulled the top plate and mine and in about 200 miles had the limp mose issue in the rain. Threw that sucker right back on and have had no issues since.
All I know WBY5 box code that they flashed me to SUCKS royally.
https://www.f150forum.com/f70/ecoboo...23824/index73/
Get a sct tuner and a tune for the truck I your concerned about it. IMO that's the best way to go. You can get a safe 87oct tune if you don't care about performance at all vs a performance tune. Sure it's a few hundred bucks but it's a better/long term fix vs Fords band-aid fix.
The Ford Hotline engineers didn't even have the information on what exactly changed in the tune, oh well I tried. Someone is just going to have to be the guinea pig here and with the rainy season ahead I am sure I will see my share of customers coming into the dealer wanting the fix.
I may have gained some low end response with it, but it was RICH----real rich. In 200 miles I looked like I was driving a diesel----my rear bumper was saturated by carbon build-up.
MPG dropped big time to like 16.2-16.5 HWY (Prior to the flash I had got about 19-21mpg) on trips up north. The turbos spool faster but it is CONSTANTLY in boost at like 62-65mph.
MPG dropped big time to like 16.2-16.5 HWY (Prior to the flash I had got about 19-21mpg) on trips up north. The turbos spool faster but it is CONSTANTLY in boost at like 62-65mph.
#45
Senior Member
Also curious if anyone has dyno'ed before and after the previous TSBs? Cause the butt meter can lie like a rug.
#46
Senior Member
I changed the plugs on my SHO (which does not have the condensation issue; the cars are not affected) at 71k and the idle smoothed out, she seemed a tad more responsive, had better fuel economy, etc. And it was the same Motorcraft Iridiums gaped at 0.032 from the factory. I think the old ones were .04 and opened up to around .05 or so (I forget exactly; it was a couple weeks ago)
Did the F150 too and the 4.5k RPM miss went away completely.
#47
Because the factory would want to keep the gap they determined was best (not always reality as we know).
Here is what we see in the cars.....not as much water in the IC/CAC as it is less effective than the F150's, but plenty of oil ingestion and unburnt fuel and water accumulating in the crankcase as they have the same PCV system that only evacuates at idle and part throttle when no boost is present:
Intake valve coking is more severe then on the F150 as well:
Here is what we see in the cars.....not as much water in the IC/CAC as it is less effective than the F150's, but plenty of oil ingestion and unburnt fuel and water accumulating in the crankcase as they have the same PCV system that only evacuates at idle and part throttle when no boost is present:
Intake valve coking is more severe then on the F150 as well:
#48
Senior Member
Because the factory would want to keep the gap they determined was best (not always reality as we know).
Here is what we see in the cars.....not as much water in the IC/CAC as it is less effective than the F150's, but plenty of oil ingestion and unburnt fuel and water accumulating in the crankcase as they have the same PCV system that only evacuates at idle and part throttle when no boost is present:
Here is what we see in the cars.....not as much water in the IC/CAC as it is less effective than the F150's, but plenty of oil ingestion and unburnt fuel and water accumulating in the crankcase as they have the same PCV system that only evacuates at idle and part throttle when no boost is present:
Any dyno runs before and after to show a real difference in performance? Cause the only ones I've seen were from BG where after 40 runs the best they could do is "gain" 2hp (~.75%) and 4 lb-ft (~1.5%). That's not directed as a slam but an invitation.
So unless you have OCD about a spotless intake or plan to modify it what is it hurting? By the time the car/truck has 150-200k I'm going to be looking at another one anyway as it will most likely be 10-15 years old and will have little other issues cropping up that will drive me nuts. And I'll feel like I got my money's worth.
Last edited by itguy08; 03-06-2014 at 02:40 PM.
#49
Senior Member
I had a 94 Mustang 5.0 and it looked way way worse than that when I removed the intake manifold, it was like a black tar.
#50
Senior Member
Bingo! I'd bet every engine has that goop. Except carburated engines or throttle body injected engines as those send fuel/air throughout the intake.