Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

2012 eco or 5.0l ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2012, 08:18 PM
  #121  
Senior Member
 
speeddemon86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 4,654
Received 149 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marinemike0931

Yeah.. little slow, lol. Reread it caught the space between the a-jar and I don't have to refill every week so thought he really had a leak. Figure the sync was a joke but figured I'd address it all. What an idiot, sorry fellas. I was reading through everything fast trying to catch up. Now I'm just embarrassed, lol
If ya can't laugh at yourself right! Lol it's all good put a grin on my face
Old 12-31-2012, 08:19 PM
  #122  
Senior Member
 
marinemike0931's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Luling, LA
Posts: 784
Received 107 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speeddemon86

If ya can't laugh at yourself right! Lol it's all good put a grin on my face
Yeah mine too... I think I turned little red too lol
Old 12-31-2012, 08:21 PM
  #123  
Senior Member
 
speeddemon86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 4,654
Received 149 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Lol
Old 03-09-2013, 04:19 AM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
LRomeroIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 685
Received 53 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

http://youtu.be/X_Vh_P2qXv4

Beats a Cummins
Old 03-09-2013, 10:45 AM
  #125  
FX4 User
 
thundergrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 156
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I went into the dealership buying into the ford propaganda videos on YouTube knowing I wanted an Eco. I test drove a platinum and walked away considering not even wanting one at all. The platinum felt like a soccer moms SUV or car. Too spongy of a ride coming from a Modified Cummins. The next week had more issues with the cummins so went for another test drive. This time I took out a FX4 with the 20's and the ride was much more to my liking. Still very soft compared to the cummins but it felt like a good riding truck. Found exactly what I wanted and bought.

I didn't drive a 5.0 but the more I drive my Eco the more it reminds my why I loved my diesel and now the Eco. It's a little torque monster and nothing drives me batty like a truck that has to shift on every incline. The Eco just pulls. Sure it's not a diesel but its miles above the 5.4 I had before the cummins. 20mpg isn't bad either. I think ford is on the right track with this one.
Old 03-09-2013, 09:03 PM
  #126  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thundergrey
I went into the dealership buying into the ford propaganda videos on YouTube knowing I wanted an Eco. I test drove a platinum and walked away considering not even wanting one at all. The platinum felt like a soccer moms SUV or car. Too spongy of a ride coming from a Modified Cummins. The next week had more issues with the cummins so went for another test drive. This time I took out a FX4 with the 20's and the ride was much more to my liking. Still very soft compared to the cummins but it felt like a good riding truck. Found exactly what I wanted and bought.

I didn't drive a 5.0 but the more I drive my Eco the more it reminds my why I loved my diesel and now the Eco. It's a little torque monster and nothing drives me batty like a truck that has to shift on every incline. The Eco just pulls. Sure it's not a diesel but its miles above the 5.4 I had before the cummins. 20mpg isn't bad either. I think ford is on the right track with this one.
All you Eco owners always talk about hating a truck that shifts on inclines like the 5.0 shifts on every hill. Got news for you, it doesn't. With the cruise set on 80, driving from San Antonio, to Kerrville, there is only one very long, very steep hill my truck downshifts on, and almost everyone downshifts here. Have rode in a Duramax that shifted not much farther up the hill than mine. 18 wheelers are typically driving no faster than 35 mph.

Between Corpus and San Antonio, it doesn't shift at all.

Coming from a Dodge, I hate that downshifting too, ad my Dodge would drop from fourth to third all the time, and even to second on many hills.

I love this 5.0l & it's ability to hold sixth on hills. It may not have as flat a torque curve as the Eco, but the Coyote more than holds it's own.

Last edited by sullyman; 03-09-2013 at 09:11 PM.
Old 03-09-2013, 09:27 PM
  #127  
FX4 User
 
thundergrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 156
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sullyman

All you Eco owners always talk about hating a truck that shifts on inclines like the 5.0 shifts on every hill. Got news for you, it doesn't. With the cruise set on 80, driving from San Antonio, to Kerrville, there is only one very long, very steep hill my truck downshifts on, and almost everyone downshifts here. Have rode in a Duramax that shifted not much farther up the hill than mine. 18 wheelers are typically driving no faster than 35 mph.

Between Corpus and San Antonio, it doesn't shift at all.

Coming from a Dodge, I hate that downshifting too, ad my Dodge would drop from fourth to third all the time, and even to second on many hills.

I love this 5.0l & it's ability to hold sixth on hills. It may not have as flat a torque curve as the Eco, but the Coyote more than holds it's own.
Don't know about the 5.0 and never said I did. My 5.4 though sure did have to downshift a lot. Even on the smallest hills it was shifting. Doesn't surprise me though at 80mph it doesn't downshift much. You are well into the power there. Up here our government doesn't trust us to go over 60mph (100kmh) very often so unless I'm feeling lucky I don't see 80mph much.
Old 03-09-2013, 10:34 PM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
geno51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Prescott AZ
Posts: 3,150
Received 456 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thundergrey

Don't know about the 5.0 and never said I did. My 5.4 though sure did have to downshift a lot. Even on the smallest hills it was shifting. Doesn't surprise me though at 80mph it doesn't downshift much. You are well into the power there. Up here our government doesn't trust us to go over 60mph (100kmh) very often so unless I'm feeling lucky I don't see 80mph much.
Very true at 80 not many will have to downshift. Now at 60 that's a different story
Old 03-09-2013, 10:43 PM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sullyman

All you Eco owners always talk about hating a truck that shifts on inclines like the 5.0 shifts on every hill. Got news for you, it doesn't. With the cruise set on 80, driving from San Antonio, to Kerrville, there is only one very long, very steep hill my truck downshifts on, and almost everyone downshifts here. Have rode in a Duramax that shifted not much farther up the hill than mine. 18 wheelers are typically driving no faster than 35 mph.

Between Corpus and San Antonio, it doesn't shift at all.

Coming from a Dodge, I hate that downshifting too, ad my Dodge would drop from fourth to third all the time, and even to second on many hills.

I love this 5.0l & it's ability to hold sixth on hills. It may not have as flat a torque curve as the Eco, but the Coyote more than holds it's own.
Boohoo. You act like the guy called you out by first and last name. Holy cry baby.com. it was a simple personal observation with a detailed background.
The following 2 users liked this post by jcain:
geno51 (03-09-2013), TwinTurboFx4 (03-10-2013)



Quick Reply: 2012 eco or 5.0l ??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.