Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Someone please shed some light on this it's driving me crazy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2014, 08:51 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
enveng427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 37
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, so the owner's manual gives 205 and 210 for the horsepowers. I read a different number every place I go so I'm gonna trust the OEM. Admittedly the 30 pound feet of torque is a fair difference. I'm wondering though, is the transmission actually different? If so, how? I've only seen internet banter about it maybe might be different. Seems like these people made it up.
Old 03-03-2014, 09:16 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

I've rebuilt them, they use different stall speeds for peak effiecency. You can not possible bolt a transmission from a 4.2 to a 4.6 or vice versa. I suspect the valve bodies being slight setup differently in a OE application.
Old 03-04-2014, 12:34 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,200
Received 5,545 Likes on 4,623 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by enveng427
Ok, so the owner's manual gives 205 and 210 for the horsepowers. I read a different number every place I go so I'm gonna trust the OEM. Admittedly the 30 pound feet of torque is a fair difference. I'm wondering though, is the transmission actually different? If so, how? I've only seen internet banter about it maybe might be different. Seems like these people made it up.
You must not have the 97 OEM manual. You should know YOUR engine so... -Here, I'll help you out once more,

The 97 V6 is 205 HP
255 @ 3700 RPM TRQ

The 98 V6 is 210 HP
255 @ 3000 RPM TRQ

Ford bumped compression ratios in 98. From 9.26 to 9.3. So, scratch everything you thought was correct and jot this down in your manual.
Old 03-04-2014, 01:00 AM
  #14  
Built Ford Tough
 
Ftruck150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,150
Received 165 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I had a 98 4.2, I would never dream of towing a car trailer + car, sorry. It worked hard enough with two 400lb quads and a 700-800lb trailer behind it Towing 4000-5000+ lbs (obviously just a rough estimate of a tandem car trailer + car) seems like it's just asking for trouble
Old 03-04-2014, 04:19 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,200
Received 5,545 Likes on 4,623 Posts

Default

True, I wouldn't pull anything heavy w/4.6L as well. They're closer to car engines IMO. You want a tall rear gear and plenty of torque. Light stuff they're fine, but nothing more than two Aunt Esters or they'll be huffin and a puffin.
Old 03-04-2014, 03:25 PM
  #16  
2015 F-150 3.5 ecoboost
 
OTG02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canton Ohio
Posts: 2,168
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

I've got an 02 2wd single cab longbed 4.2l 3:55 gearing and I had the bed so loaded with even heavy cement bird bath and cement dolphin and base. Took a forklift to put in truck. It big and heavy plus red landscape bricks at least 20 of and a lot of other stuff.

Was moving from Texas back to ohio so bed was full of stuff with just nuff room to close the tonneau. Anyway had it loaded where it was squatting real good. Like I was driving up a hill all the time. Wish I would of went over a scale to weigh it

BUT To the point. All the way from Texas to ohio it did great and was getting close to 22 mpg at 70mph on xway. Didn't give me a bit of trouble and no huff and puff. A bit sluggish goin up a grade. But nothing where I had to turn on flashers. Lol.

All in all I would tow a car and trailer behind mine any day. In fact I did in Texas had a car trailer with a 99 ranger loaded up and pulled it bout 200 miles and no prob. It's no 5.4 I know so I know there was power loss and such but a 4.2 can pull a load. Just wouldn't do it every day LOL.



Someone please shed some light on this it's driving me crazy!-image-1819416358.jpg

Here the only pic I have with the fully loaded down bed getting ready to leave Texas and head back home to ohio.
Old 03-04-2014, 10:47 PM
  #17  
Built Ford Tough
 
Ftruck150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,150
Received 165 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

There's a huge difference between 1000-1500 lbs in the bed and a 5000 pound trailer behind it.

Even with equal weights, say 1500 pounds in the bed, or a 1500 pound trailer, the trailer will always be harder to pull.
Old 03-04-2014, 11:01 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

[MENTION=74944]OTG02[/MENTION] You also have 3.55's. I wouldnt dare pull a car hauler with a honda civic on with a 4.2 with 3.08's like the OP has. When I had my 97 2wd with a 4.6 and 3:31's I used a car hauler to tow my mustang back from NC. Did great but that was a 4.6. Got around 16mpg doing 70 pulling 6500lbs.
Old 03-04-2014, 11:34 PM
  #19  
2015 F-150 3.5 ecoboost
 
OTG02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canton Ohio
Posts: 2,168
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts

Default

Yeah I kinda forgot I read that OP had 3:08. Ok disregard my post. Sorry. Lol. I blame old age on forgetfulness lol. Mine at least.



Quick Reply: Someone please shed some light on this it's driving me crazy!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.