Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Engine Builders talk.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2016, 01:30 AM
  #9211  
Senior Member
 
ZebraFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,217
Received 45 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Anyone have any advice for me regarding CR with boost? The goal for the truck is to be quick and torquey. The kind of power that pins you back in your seat and makes you grin. I've already got a lightning blower that has been ported for it and all the stuff to do the swap. I'm going to do a built bottom end to handle the power. Curious if I should
1. Go stock lightning compression ratio at 8.4:1 and run 16 pounds of boost (8 lb lower)
2. Bump CR to 9:1 and run less boost
3. Bump CR to 9:1 and still run 16 pounds of boost while hoping that my tune is spot on and probably lower timing as well.

Only constraints are that I still need to be able to tow and haul stuff with the truck. Also, pump gas only so 93 octane is the best I can get here. Thanks for any input
Old 09-29-2016, 07:47 AM
  #9212  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jprevat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,789
Received 1,370 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZebraFord
Anyone have any advice for me regarding CR with boost? The goal for the truck is to be quick and torquey. The kind of power that pins you back in your seat and makes you grin. I've already got a lightning blower that has been ported for it and all the stuff to do the swap. I'm going to do a built bottom end to handle the power. Curious if I should
1. Go stock lightning compression ratio at 8.4:1 and run 16 pounds of boost (8 lb lower)
2. Bump CR to 9:1 and run less boost
3. Bump CR to 9:1 and still run 16 pounds of boost while hoping that my tune is spot on and probably lower timing as well.

Only constraints are that I still need to be able to tow and haul stuff with the truck. Also, pump gas only so 93 octane is the best I can get here. Thanks for any input
I would go with option 2 and then you have the option of swapping the lower out if doesn't have enough juice for you.
Old 09-29-2016, 08:08 AM
  #9213  
Senior Member
 
2thousand5.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,354
Received 104 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZebraFord
Anyone have any advice for me regarding CR with boost? The goal for the truck is to be quick and torquey. The kind of power that pins you back in your seat and makes you grin. I've already got a lightning blower that has been ported for it and all the stuff to do the swap. I'm going to do a built bottom end to handle the power. Curious if I should
1. Go stock lightning compression ratio at 8.4:1 and run 16 pounds of boost (8 lb lower)
2. Bump CR to 9:1 and run less boost
3. Bump CR to 9:1 and still run 16 pounds of boost while hoping that my tune is spot on and probably lower timing as well.

Only constraints are that I still need to be able to tow and haul stuff with the truck. Also, pump gas only so 93 octane is the best I can get here. Thanks for any input
8.4:1 and 16 pounds will make the most power out of the 3 if the tune is right. Lower compression "increases" combustion chamber size so you can cram more air and fuel in there. 16 pounds on an 8.4 is physically more air then 16 pounds at a 9:1. But, at the same time I think you will have to spin the blower faster at an 8.4 than a 9.1 to achieve 16pounds of boost. I could be wrong tho. Cam profile is going to have a big impact on your towing and hauling preformace as well
Old 09-29-2016, 08:37 AM
  #9214  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jprevat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,789
Received 1,370 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2thousand5.4

8.4:1 and 16 pounds will make the most power out of the 3 if the tune is right. Lower compression "increases" combustion chamber size so you can cram more air and fuel in there. 16 pounds on an 8.4 is physically more air then 16 pounds at a 9:1. But, at the same time I think you will have to spin the blower faster at an 8.4 than a 9.1 to achieve 16pounds of boost. I could be wrong tho. Cam profile is going to have a big impact on your towing and hauling preformace as well
If you are correct will the m112 be able to spool up that high?
Old 09-29-2016, 09:02 AM
  #9215  
Senior Member
 
2thousand5.4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,354
Received 104 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jprevat
If you are correct will the m112 be able to spool up that high?
I'm honestly not sure. I want to say yes tho. It will probably be close to maxing it out
Old 09-29-2016, 10:02 AM
  #9216  
Senior Member
 
ZebraFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,217
Received 45 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Thanks for the advice guys. I think I'll start with 9:1 CR and then go from there with pulleys. Yes the M112 is capable of that. It's not rare for lightning guys to run 8 pound pulleys and make 16-17 pounds of boost. It gets hot pretty quick if you're on it a lot, but for just cruising around it really picks up a lot of torque. I'm gonna talk to my tuner about it before I start just to confirm. My understanding is that 8.4:1 will be a little slower "out of boost" and 9:1 will be a little better "out of boost" but probably will restrict how much boost I can actually run
Old 09-29-2016, 10:33 AM
  #9217  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jprevat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 13,789
Received 1,370 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZebraFord
Thanks for the advice guys. I think I'll start with 9:1 CR and then go from there with pulleys. Yes the M112 is capable of that. It's not rare for lightning guys to run 8 pound pulleys and make 16-17 pounds of boost. It gets hot pretty quick if you're on it a lot, but for just cruising around it really picks up a lot of torque. I'm gonna talk to my tuner about it before I start just to confirm. My understanding is that 8.4:1 will be a little slower "out of boost" and 9:1 will be a little better "out of boost" but probably will restrict how much boost I can actually run
That would probably be the direction I would go in. You do a pretty fair amount of towing so I would think that may heat things up a bit but I could be way off.
Old 09-29-2016, 11:22 AM
  #9218  
Senior Member
 
Cmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 14,978
Received 141 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

From my understanding lower boost generally can make it more reliable too anyways, so having the higher CR couldn't hurt if you're running lowery boost with it. So that meaning you really can't go wrong.

But maybe I'm looking at this wrong, maybe someone else will chip in on whether I am or not lol.
Old 09-29-2016, 11:47 AM
  #9219  
Senior Member
 
DrillRig52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,310
Received 200 Likes on 170 Posts

Default

I've currently been thinking very hard about a budget minded single turbo setup. Either buying the complete hot side from CGfab, or flipping the factory manifolds and having someone do all the plumbing work. Thinking about 6 psi, so that I have some extra power without having to rebuild everything around it.

Everything else would stay factory, only needing to upgrade injectors, MAF, fuel pump, egr delete, and exhaust.
Old 09-29-2016, 12:03 PM
  #9220  
Senior Member
 
ZebraFord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,217
Received 45 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrillRig52
I've currently been thinking very hard about a budget minded single turbo setup. Either buying the complete hot side from CGfab, or flipping the factory manifolds and having someone do all the plumbing work. Thinking about 6 psi, so that I have some extra power without having to rebuild everything around it.

Everything else would stay factory, only needing to upgrade injectors, MAF, fuel pump, egr delete, and exhaust.
You're gonna spend more money on it than a lightning supercharger swap. There's a full swap for sale right now for only $1500. That's a steal


Quick Reply: Engine Builders talk.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM.